Literature DB >> 24930120

Electrical stimulation of lumbar spinal nerve roots in dogs.

Erkut Turan1, Cengiz Unsal, Mehmet Utkan Oren, Omer Gurkan Dilek, Ismail Gokce Yildirim, Murat Sarierler.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the applicability of electrical stimulation of lumbar spinal nerve roots and obtain normative electrical root stimulation (ERS) data for L7 nerve root and sciatic nerve in dogs. For that purpose ERS and sciatic nerve stimulations were performed consecutively, in totally 40 healthy dogs. ERS was applied in the L7/S1 intervertebral space via monopolar needle electrodes. Muscle responses were recorded from the gastrocnemius muscles on the left and right hind limbs. Sciatic nerve stimulation was performed at the greater trochanter level on the left hind limb, with records obtained from the left gastrocnemius muscle. Mean root latencies of the left and right side were 5.22 ± 0.49 ms and 5.29 ± 0.53 ms, respectively. There was no significant difference in root latency between the right and left sides. The mean terminal latency was 3.82 ± 0.46 ms. The proximal motor nerve conduction velocity of the sciatic nerve was 63.15 ± 3.43 m/s. The results of this study show that ERS provides objective data about the integrity of lumbar spinal nerve roots by evaluating the entire population of motor fibres and total length of the motor axon in dogs. ERS can be considered a useful diagnostic method for confirmation of diagnoses of lumbosacral diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24930120     DOI: 10.1007/s11259-014-9608-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res Commun        ISSN: 0165-7380            Impact factor:   2.459


  25 in total

1.  Proximal and distal motor nerve conduction in obturator and femoral nerves.

Authors:  B Uludag; C Ertekin; A B Turman; D Demir; N Kiylioglu
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Lumbosacral nerve root stimulation comparing electrical with surface magnetic coil techniques.

Authors:  R A Macdonell; D Cros; B T Shahani
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  The elecrophysiological bulbocavernosus reflex test in female dogs: Its technique and applicability.

Authors:  E Turan; C Unsal; I G Yildirim
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 2.534

Review 4.  AAEM minimonograph #47: normative data in electrodiagnostic medicine. ff.

Authors:  L J Dorfman; L R Robinson
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 5.  Trauma with neurologic sequelae.

Authors:  Brett S Tennent-Brown
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.792

Review 6.  Electrophysiology of radiculopathies.

Authors:  Morris A Fisher
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Proximal femoral conductions in patients with lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy.

Authors:  Cengiz Tataroglu; Banu Bicerol; Nefati Kiylioglu; Ayca Ozkul; Ali Akyol
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 1.876

8.  Electrodiagnostic and histologic changes of graded caudal compression on cauda equina in dog.

Authors:  N H Kim; I H Yang; I K Song
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Comparison of magnetic coil stimulation and needle electrical stimulation in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Authors:  C Ertekin; R S Nejat; H Sirin; D Selçuki; N Arac; M Ertaş; Z Colakoğlu
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.876

10.  Motor nerve conduction velocity and latency in the dog.

Authors:  T L Walker; R W Redding; K G Braund
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.