| Literature DB >> 21760789 |
Asad Raza1, Muhammad Zia-Ul-Haq.
Abstract
Two simple, fast, and accurate spectrophotometric methods for the determination of alendronate sodium are described. The methods are based on charge-transfer complex formation of the drug with two π-electron acceptors 7,7,7,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) and 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) in acetonitrile and methanol medium. The methods are followed spectrophotometrically by measuring the maximum absorbance at 840 nm and 465 nm, respectively. Under the optimized experimental conditions, the calibration curves showed a linear relationship over the concentration ranges of 2-10 μg mL(-1) and 2-12 μg mL(-1), respectively. The optimal reactions conditions values such as the reagent concentration, heating time, and stability of reaction product were determined. No significant difference was obtained between the results of newly proposed methods and the B.P. Titrimetric procedures. The charge transfer approach using TCNQ and DDQ procedures described in this paper is simple, fast, accurate, precise, and extraction-free.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21760789 PMCID: PMC3132526 DOI: 10.1155/2011/680902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.885
Figure 1Absorbance spectra of the colored products produced from the reaction of alendronate sodium (5 μg mL−1) with DDQ (⋯) and TCNQ (—).
Figure 2Continuous variation plot for the reaction of alendronate sodium and color producing regents.
Scheme 1Reaction involved in analysis of alendronate sodium.
Selected spectral data for the determination of alendronate sodium by proposed spectrophotometric methods.
| Parameter | Values for | Values for |
|---|---|---|
|
| 840 | 465 |
| Beer's law verification range ( | 2–10 | 2–12 |
| Molar absorptivity (L mole−1 cm−1) | 7.9 × 104 | 4.6 × 104 |
| Sandell's sensitivity ( | 4.0 × 10−3 | 4.9 × 10−3 |
| Regression equation (Y*) | ||
| Slope (b) | 0.0254 | 0.0351 |
| Intercept (a) | 0.0238 | 0.0241 |
| Correlation coefficient ( | 0.9989 | 0.9997 |
| Limit of detection ( | 0.19 | 0.30 |
| Limit of quantification ( | 0.62 | 0.99 |
Y*: a + bC, where C is the concentration of analyte (μg/mL) and Y is absorbance unit.
Determination of alendronate sodium in the presence of possible excipients (5 μg mL−1 of alendronate sodium was taken for interferences studies).
| Excipient | Amount taken | % Recovery ± RSD ( | % Recovery ± RSD ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microcrystalline cellulose | 300 | 99.6 + 0.25 | 99.6 + 0.25 |
| Anhydrous lactose | 300 | 99.5 + 0.25 | 99.5 + 0.25 |
| Magnesium stearate | 200 | 100.1 + 0.30 | 100.1 + 0.30 |
| Croscarmellose sodium | 100 | 99.8 + 0.40 | 99.8 + 0.40 |
| Calcium phosphate | 50 | 99.4 + 0.45 | 99.4 + 0.45 |
Determination of alendronate sodium in pharmaceutical formulations by the proposed and reference [23] methods.
| Sample | Recovery ± S.D. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Official method | Method A | Method B | |
| Fosamax tablets | 99.60 ± 0.83 | 99.75 ± 0.78 | 99.87 ± 0.69 |
|
| 0.24 | 0.60 | |
|
| 1.15 | 1.14 | |
| Ostepor tablets | 100.02 ± 0.46 | 99.56 ± 0.53 | 99.92 ± 0.53 |
|
| 1.24 | 0.54 | |
|
| 1.58 | 1.28 | |
| Bongard tablets | 99.75 ± 0.63 | 99.90 ± 0.41 | 100.05 ± 0.61 |
|
| 1.42 | 0.52 | |
|
| 0.75 | 1.13 | |
| Bonate tablets | 100.12 ± 0.52 | 100.01 ± 0.57 | 99.89 ± 0.68 |
|
| 1.28 | 0.34 | |
|
| 1.22 | 1.12 | |
*Average of 3 independent analyses.