Literature DB >> 21757982

Applicability of the BCLC staging system to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea: analysis at a single center with a liver transplant center.

Sung Eun Kim1, Han Chu Lee, Kang Mo Kim, Young-Suk Lim, Young-Hwa Chung, Yung Sang Lee, Dong Jin Suh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is logical for the staging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) because it was based on survival data. This study evaluated the applicability of the BCLC staging system and reasons for divergence from BCLC-recommended treatments in Korean HCC patients.
METHODS: One hundred and sixty consecutive HCC patients were prospectively enrolled. Treatments were generally recommended according to the guideline of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, but patients were also informed about alternative treatments. The final decision was made with patient agreement, and was based on the doctor's preferences when a patient was unable to reach a decision.
RESULTS: There were 2 (1%), 101 (64%), 20 (12.5%), 34 (21.5%), and 3 (1%) patients with very early-, early-, intermediate-, advanced-, and terminal-stage disease, respectively. Only 64 patients (40%) were treated according to BCLC recommendations. The treatment deviated from BCLC recommendations in 68% (69/101) and 79% (27/34) of patients with early and advanced stage, respectively. The main causes of deviation were refusal to undergo surgery, the presence of an indeterminate malignancy nodule, the absence of a suitable donor, or financial problems.
CONCLUSIONS: Donor shortage, financial problems, the relatively limited efficacy of molecular targeting agents, and the presence of an indeterminate nodule were the main causes of deviation from BCLC recommendations. Even after excluding cases in which decisions were made by patient preference, only 66% of the HCC patients were treated according to BCLC recommendations. Treatment guidelines that reflect the Korean situation are mandatory for HCC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21757982      PMCID: PMC3304632          DOI: 10.3350/kjhep.2011.17.2.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Hepatol        ISSN: 1738-222X


  17 in total

1.  Proposal of a new prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of 403 patients.

Authors:  R Tateishi; H Yoshida; S Shiina; H Imamura; K Hasegawa; T Teratani; S Obi; S Sato; Y Koike; T Fujishima; M Makuuchi; M Omata
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score): its value and limitations, and a proposal for a new staging system, the Japan Integrated Staging Score (JIS score).

Authors:  Masatoshi Kudo; Hobyung Chung; Yukio Osaki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  The safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and main portal vein obstruction. A prospective controlled study.

Authors:  H S Lee; J S Kim; I J Choi; J W Chung; J H Park; C Y Kim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Prospective validation of the CLIP score: a new prognostic system for patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of 7 staging systems in an American cohort.

Authors:  Jorge A Marrero; Robert J Fontana; Ashley Barrat; Frederick Askari; Hari S Conjeevaram; Grace L Su; Anna S Lok
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  A new prognostic classification for predicting survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hépatocellulaire.

Authors:  S Chevret; J C Trinchet; D Mathieu; A A Rached; M Beaugrand; C Chastang
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for portal vein thrombosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Dae Yong Kim; Won Park; Do Hoon Lim; Joon Hyoek Lee; Byung Chul Yoo; Seung Woon Paik; Kwang Cheol Kho; Tae Hyun Kim; Yong Chan Ahn; Seung Jae Huh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Prospective validation of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system.

Authors:  Umberto Cillo; Alessandro Vitale; Francesco Grigoletto; Fabio Farinati; Alberto Brolese; Giacomo Zanus; Daniele Neri; Patrizia Boccagni; Nela Srsen; Francesco D'Amico; Francesco Antonio Ciarleglio; Alessio Bridda; Davide Francesco D'Amico
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein invasion: results of treatment with transcatheter oily chemoembolization.

Authors:  J W Chung; J H Park; J K Han; B I Choi; M C Han
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma and prognosis in relation to treatment. Study of 850 patients.

Authors:  K Okuda; T Ohtsuki; H Obata; M Tomimatsu; N Okazaki; H Hasegawa; Y Nakajima; K Ohnishi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  6 in total

1.  Adherence to BCLC recommendations for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: impact on survival according to stage.

Authors:  Luciana Kikuchi; Aline Lopes Chagas; Regiane S S M Alencar; Claudia Tani; Marcio A Diniz; Luiz A C D'Albuquerque; Flair José Carrilho
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  Use of (18)F-FDG PET to predict tumor progression and survival in patients with intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Min Jin Kim; Young Seok Kim; Youn Hee Cho; Hee Yoon Jang; Jeong-Yeop Song; Sae Hwan Lee; Soung Won Jeong; Sang Gyune Kim; Jae Young Jang; Hong Su Kim; Boo Sung Kim; Won Hyung Lee; Jung Mi Park; Jae Myung Lee; Min Hee Lee; Deuk Lin Choi
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.884

3.  Systematic review of the outcomes of surgical resection for intermediate and advanced Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A critical appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  Ye Xin Koh; Hwee Leong Tan; Weng Kit Lye; Juinn Huar Kam; Adrian Kah Heng Chiow; Siong San Tan; Su Pin Choo; Alexander Yaw Fui Chung; Brian Kim Poh Goh
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2018-06-27

4.  Comparison of long-term survival of patients with BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection or transarterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Jian-Hong Zhong; Bang-De Xiang; Wen-Feng Gong; Yang Ke; Qin-Guo Mo; Liang Ma; Xing Liu; Le-Qun Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization versus transarterial chemoembolization alone for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Hao Hu; Zhenhua Duan; Xiaoran Long; Yancu Hertzanu; Haibin Shi; Sheng Liu; Zhengqiang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Hepatocellular carcinoma surgery outcomes in the developing world: A 20-year retrospective cohort study at the National Cancer Institute of Peru.

Authors:  Eloy Ruiz; Teresa Rojas Rojas; Francisco Berrospi; Ivan Chávez; Carlos Luque; Luis Cano; Franco Doimi; Pascal Pineau; Eric Deharo; Stéphane Bertani
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2016-01-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.