Literature DB >> 21756883

Transmembrane molecular transport during versus after extremely large, nanosecond electric pulses.

Kyle C Smith1, James C Weaver.   

Abstract

Recently there has been intense and growing interest in the non-thermal biological effects of nanosecond electric pulses, particularly apoptosis induction. These effects have been hypothesized to result from the widespread creation of small, lipidic pores in the plasma and organelle membranes of cells (supra-electroporation) and, more specifically, ionic and molecular transport through these pores. Here we show that transport occurs overwhelmingly after pulsing. First, we show that the electrical drift distance for typical charged solutes during nanosecond pulses (up to 100 ns), even those with very large magnitudes (up to 10 MV/m), ranges from only a fraction of the membrane thickness (5 nm) to several membrane thicknesses. This is much smaller than the diameter of a typical cell (∼16 μm), which implies that molecular drift transport during nanosecond pulses is necessarily minimal. This implication is not dependent on assumptions about pore density or the molecular flux through pores. Second, we show that molecular transport resulting from post-pulse diffusion through minimum-size pores is orders of magnitude larger than electrical drift-driven transport during nanosecond pulses. While field-assisted charge entry and the magnitude of flux favor transport during nanosecond pulses, these effects are too small to overcome the orders of magnitude more time available for post-pulse transport. Therefore, the basic conclusion that essentially all transmembrane molecular transport occurs post-pulse holds across the plausible range of relevant parameters. Our analysis shows that a primary direct consequence of nanosecond electric pulses is the creation (or maintenance) of large populations of small pores in cell membranes that govern post-pulse transmembrane transport of small ions and molecules.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21756883      PMCID: PMC3463951          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.06.171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  24 in total

1.  Quantitative study of electroporation-mediated molecular uptake and cell viability.

Authors:  P J Canatella; J F Karr; J A Petros; M R Prausnitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Electrodiffusion of molecules in aqueous media: a robust, discretized description for electroporation and other transport phenomena.

Authors:  Kyle C Smith; James C Weaver
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Bioelectric effects of intense ultrashort pulses.

Authors:  R P Joshi; K H Schoenbach
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010

4.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell.

Authors:  Wanda Krassowska; Petar D Filev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Active mechanisms are needed to describe cell responses to submicrosecond, megavolt-per-meter pulses: cell models for ultrashort pulses.

Authors:  Kyle C Smith; James C Weaver
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Optimized nanosecond pulsed electric field therapy can cause murine malignant melanomas to self-destruct with a single treatment.

Authors:  Richard Nuccitelli; Kevin Tran; Saleh Sheikh; Brian Athos; Mark Kreis; Pamela Nuccitelli
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Towards solid tumor treatment by nanosecond pulsed electric fields.

Authors:  Alex T Esser; Kyle C Smith; T R Gowrishankar; James C Weaver
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-08

8.  Dose-dependent thresholds of 10-ns electric pulse induced plasma membrane disruption and cytotoxicity in multiple cell lines.

Authors:  Bennett L Ibey; Caleb C Roth; Andrei G Pakhomov; Joshua A Bernhard; Gerald J Wilmink; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An apoptosis targeted stimulus with nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) in E4 squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei Ren; Stephen J Beebe
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Nanoelectropulse-driven membrane perturbation and small molecule permeabilization.

Authors:  P Thomas Vernier; Yinghua Sun; Martin A Gundersen
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.241

View more
  13 in total

1.  Nanometer-Scale Permeabilization and Osmotic Swelling Induced by 5-ns Pulsed Electric Fields.

Authors:  Esin B Sözer; Yu-Hsuan Wu; Stefania Romeo; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Electropore Formation in Mechanically Constrained Phospholipid Bilayers.

Authors:  M Laura Fernández; Marcelo Raúl Risk; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Elena Gianulis; P Thomas Vernier; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-01-10

4.  Different Cell Viability Assays Reveal Inconsistent Results After Bleomycin Electrotransfer In Vitro.

Authors:  Baltramiejus Jakštys; Paulius Ruzgys; Mindaugas Tamošiūnas; Saulius Šatkauskas
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  Diffuse, non-polar electropermeabilization and reduced propidium uptake distinguish the effect of nanosecond electric pulses.

Authors:  Iurii Semenov; Christian Zemlin; Olga N Pakhomova; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-06-22

6.  Cancellation of cellular responses to nanoelectroporation by reversing the stimulus polarity.

Authors:  Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Betsy Gregory; Karl H Schoenbach; Jody C Ullery; Hope T Beier; Sambasiva R Rajulapati; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Ion transport into cells exposed to monopolar and bipolar nanosecond pulses.

Authors:  Karl H Schoenbach; Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.373

8.  Low-energy defibrillation with nanosecond electric shocks.

Authors:  Frency Varghese; Johanna U Neuber; Fei Xie; Jonathan M Philpott; Andrei G Pakhomov; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 10.787

9.  Thresholds for phosphatidylserine externalization in Chinese hamster ovarian cells following exposure to nanosecond pulsed electrical fields (nsPEF).

Authors:  Rebecca L Vincelette; Caleb C Roth; Maureen P McConnell; Jason A Payne; Hope T Beier; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Basic features of a cell electroporation model: illustrative behavior for two very different pulses.

Authors:  Reuben S Son; Kyle C Smith; Thiruvallur R Gowrishankar; P Thomas Vernier; James C Weaver
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 1.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.