| Literature DB >> 21756308 |
Maria Bountouri1, Eirini Fragkiadaki, Vasileios Ntafis, Theo Kanellos, Eftychia Xylouri.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For first time in Greece equine influenza virus infection was confirmed, by isolation and molecular analysis, as the cause of clinical respiratory disease among unvaccinated horses during 2003 and 2007 outbreaks.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21756308 PMCID: PMC3158125 DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Figure 1CPE of equine influenza virus: MDCK cells incubated in the absence [control (a)] and presence of 100 μl swab extract for 24 h (b), 48 h(c) and 72 h (d). (Invertoscope, 10× magnification).
Figure 2Viability of MDCK cell cultures 72 h post infection at each passage expressed as a percentage of live cells in comparison to the control cell culture.
Results of Virus Isolation confirmed by RT-PCR assay for the M gene (at the 3rd passage), hemagglutination titer, and TCID50 of the isolates at the 3rd passage
| HA titer | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passage I | Passage II | Passage III | VI* | TCID 50/ml | |
| 0 | 4 | 4 | + | 10 1,25 | |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | + | 10 0,75 | |
| 2 | 4 | 32 | + | 10 1,75 | |
| 0 | 4 | 8 | + | 10 1,75 | |
| 2 | 4 | 8 | + | 10 0,5 | |
| 2 | 4 | 8 | + | 10 1,25 | |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | + | 10 2,25 | |
| 0 | 2 | 4 | + | 10 2,25 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 10 1,5 | |
| 0 | 8 | 32 | + | 10 2,75 | |
| 0 | 0 | 4 | + | 10 1,75 | |
| 2 | 4 | 8 | + | 10 1,5 | |
| 4 | 8 | 16? | + | 10 2 | |
| 0 | 4 | 32 | + | 10 2,25 | |
| 4 | 8 | 32 | + | 10 1,75 | |
| 4 | 16 | 32 | + | 10 2,5 | |
* Confirmed by RT-PCR for the M gene at the 3rd passage
Comparison of nucleotide sequences of Greek virus with published equine influenza virus sequences using BLAST web-based program
| Most similar strains | Similarity % | |
|---|---|---|
| HA gene | A/eq/Newmarket/2/93/(H3N8) | 100% |
| NA gene | A/equine/Gansu/7/2008(H3N8) | 99% |
Figure 3Evolutionary relationships of H3 protein: The evolutionary history was inferred using the NJ method. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted in MEGA4.
Figure 4Evolutionary relationships of N8 protein: The evolutionary history was inferred using the NJ method. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted in MEGA4.