Literature DB >> 21754779

4,4'-Dibromo-2,2'-{ethane-1,2-diylbis[(methyl-imino)-methyl-ene]}diphenol.

Augusto Rivera, Jicli José Rojas, Jaime Ríos-Motta, Michal Dušek, Karla Fejfarová.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C(18)H(22)Br(2)N(2)O(2), contains one half-mol-ecule that is related to the other half by a center of inversion located at the mid-point of the central C-C bond. The hy-droxy (phenolic) groups are linked to the N atoms by O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds, which generate S(6) rings.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21754779      PMCID: PMC3120315          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the synthesis, see: Rivera et al. (2010 ▶). For the uses of tetra­hydro­salens in coordination chemistry, see: Atwood (1997 ▶). For a related structure, see: Naza­renko et al. (2000 ▶). For reference bond lenghts, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C18H22Br2N2O2 M = 458.2 Orthorhombic, a = 15.9282 (3) Å b = 6.1123 (2) Å c = 18.3315 (4) Å V = 1784.72 (8) Å3 Z = 4 Cu Kα radiation μ = 5.87 mm−1 T = 120 K 0.36 × 0.06 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with an Atlas (Gemini ultra Cu) detector Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.611, T max = 1 24526 measured reflections 1591 independent reflections 1482 reflections with I > 3σ(I) R int = 0.028

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.021 wR(F 2) = 0.075 S = 1.52 1591 reflections 112 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.32 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2003 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: JANA2006 (Petříček et al., 2006 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: JANA2006. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017193/hb5874sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811017193/hb5874Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C18H22Br2N2O2F(000) = 920
Mr = 458.2Dx = 1.705 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.5418 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 16599 reflections
a = 15.9282 (3) Åθ = 2.8–66.9°
b = 6.1123 (2) ŵ = 5.87 mm1
c = 18.3315 (4) ÅT = 120 K
V = 1784.72 (8) Å3Needle, colourless
Z = 40.36 × 0.06 × 0.05 mm
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with an Atlas (Gemini ultra Cu) detector1591 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance Ultra (Cu) X-ray Source1482 reflections with I > 3σ(I)
mirrorRint = 0.028
Detector resolution: 10.3784 pixels mm-1θmax = 67.1°, θmin = 4.8°
Rotation method data acquisition using ω scansh = −18→18
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)k = −7→7
Tmin = 0.611, Tmax = 1l = −21→21
24526 measured reflections
Refinement on F241 constraints
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.075Weighting scheme based on measured s.u.'s w = 1/[σ2(I) + 0.0016I2]
S = 1.52(Δ/σ)max = 0.008
1591 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.20 e Å3
112 parametersΔρmin = −0.32 e Å3
0 restraints
Experimental. CrysAlisPro, Oxford Diffraction (2009), Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm.
Refinement. The refinement was carried out against all reflections. The conventional R-factor is always based on F. The goodness of fit as well as the weighted R-factor are based on F and F2 for refinement carried out on F and F2, respectively. The threshold expression is used only for calculating R-factors etc. and it is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement.The program used for refinement, Jana2006, uses the weighting scheme based on the experimental expectations, see _refine_ls_weighting_details, that does not force S to be one. Therefore the values of S are usually larger than the ones from the SHELX program.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.640851 (13)0.05571 (4)0.580303 (11)0.03125 (11)
O40.61560 (9)0.4268 (2)0.88393 (7)0.0270 (4)
N20.58909 (9)0.0319 (2)0.93218 (8)0.0195 (4)
C10.59115 (9)0.1285 (3)0.80150 (9)0.0202 (4)
C20.62193 (10)0.3384 (3)0.81629 (9)0.0214 (5)
C30.66038 (12)0.4593 (3)0.76131 (11)0.0242 (5)
C40.66647 (10)0.3757 (3)0.69103 (9)0.0251 (5)
C50.63443 (9)0.1714 (3)0.67664 (10)0.0227 (5)
C60.59736 (10)0.0460 (3)0.73124 (10)0.0217 (5)
C70.54916 (10)−0.0057 (3)0.86063 (9)0.0216 (4)
C80.53980 (10)−0.0646 (3)0.99219 (9)0.0218 (5)
C90.67487 (11)−0.0584 (3)0.93342 (10)0.0241 (5)
H30.6828550.6014790.772030.0291*
H40.6926870.4595080.653040.0301*
H60.576136−0.097260.7202730.026*
H7a0.4907780.0324170.8633540.0259*
H7b0.552676−0.1581840.8484280.0259*
H8a0.573654−0.0707971.0354650.0262*
H8b0.525375−0.2127230.9801580.0262*
H9a0.701148−0.0231340.979050.0289*
H9b0.672436−0.2144960.9278670.0289*
H9c0.7068920.0034170.8941380.0289*
H4o0.6031 (15)0.326 (4)0.9104 (12)0.0323*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.03214 (19)0.0431 (2)0.01850 (19)0.00457 (7)−0.00120 (6)−0.00091 (7)
O40.0343 (7)0.0206 (6)0.0260 (7)−0.0033 (5)0.0042 (5)−0.0036 (5)
N20.0153 (7)0.0236 (8)0.0195 (7)−0.0017 (5)0.0009 (5)0.0002 (5)
C10.0144 (7)0.0228 (8)0.0235 (8)0.0010 (6)−0.0004 (6)0.0020 (7)
C20.0172 (7)0.0228 (8)0.0243 (8)0.0015 (6)−0.0011 (6)0.0006 (7)
C30.0210 (8)0.0226 (9)0.0291 (10)−0.0022 (6)−0.0008 (7)0.0037 (6)
C40.0180 (8)0.0298 (9)0.0276 (9)−0.0002 (7)−0.0002 (6)0.0075 (7)
C50.0181 (8)0.0314 (10)0.0185 (8)0.0044 (6)−0.0013 (5)0.0004 (7)
C60.0190 (8)0.0228 (9)0.0232 (9)0.0018 (6)−0.0032 (6)0.0008 (6)
C70.0194 (8)0.0244 (8)0.0210 (8)−0.0042 (7)−0.0012 (6)0.0005 (7)
C80.0189 (8)0.0251 (9)0.0214 (8)−0.0012 (6)0.0012 (6)0.0036 (6)
C90.0163 (9)0.0289 (10)0.0271 (8)0.0019 (6)0.0000 (7)0.0004 (6)
Br1—C51.9051 (18)C4—H40.96
O4—H4o0.81 (2)C5—C61.392 (2)
N2—C71.476 (2)C6—H60.96
N2—C81.475 (2)C7—H7a0.96
N2—C91.474 (2)C7—H7b0.96
C1—C21.400 (2)C8—C8i1.521 (2)
C1—C61.387 (2)C8—H8a0.96
C1—C71.515 (2)C8—H8b0.96
C2—C31.392 (3)C9—H9a0.96
C3—C41.389 (3)C9—H9b0.96
C3—H30.96C9—H9c0.96
C4—C51.375 (3)
C7—N2—C8111.79 (13)N2—C7—C1111.17 (13)
C7—N2—C9110.78 (13)N2—C7—H7a109.4713
C8—N2—C9109.40 (13)N2—C7—H7b109.4711
C2—C1—C6119.21 (15)C1—C7—H7a109.4712
C2—C1—C7120.83 (14)C1—C7—H7b109.4709
C6—C1—C7119.93 (15)H7a—C7—H7b107.7191
C1—C2—C3120.04 (16)N2—C8—C8i112.14 (13)
C2—C3—C4120.46 (16)N2—C8—H8a109.4713
C2—C3—H3119.771N2—C8—H8b109.4716
C4—C3—H3119.7725C8i—C8—H8a109.4716
C3—C4—C5119.09 (16)C8i—C8—H8b109.4707
C3—C4—H4120.4567H8a—C8—H8b106.6664
C5—C4—H4120.4562N2—C9—H9a109.4705
Br1—C5—C4119.68 (13)N2—C9—H9b109.471
Br1—C5—C6119.00 (14)N2—C9—H9c109.4718
C4—C5—C6121.31 (16)H9a—C9—H9b109.4713
C1—C6—C5119.85 (16)H9a—C9—H9c109.4714
C1—C6—H6120.0729H9b—C9—H9c109.4713
C5—C6—H6120.073
N2—C8—C8i—N2i180
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O4—H4o···N20.81 (2)1.86 (2)2.6051 (19)154 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O4—H4o⋯N20.81 (2)1.86 (2)2.6051 (19)154 (2)
  1 in total

1.  Synthesis of a new series of N,N'-dimethyltetrahydrosalen (H2[H2Me]salen) ligands by the reductive ring-opening of 3,3'-ethylene-bis(3,4-dihydro-6-substituted-2H-1,3-benzoxazines).

Authors:  Augusto Rivera; Jicli José Rojas; Jairo Salazar-Barrios; Mauricio Maldonado; Jaime Ríos-Motta
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 4.411

  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  rac-4-Chloro-2-[({2-[(3-chloro-6-hy-droxy-2,4-dimethyl-benz-yl)(meth-yl)amino]-prop-yl}(meth-yl)amino)-meth-yl]-3,5-dimethyl-phenol.

Authors:  Augusto Rivera; Dency José Pacheco; Jaime Ríos-Motta; Mauricio Maldonado; Michael Bolte
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-09-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.