Literature DB >> 21754729

2-Amino-terephthalic acid-4,4'-bipyridine (1/1).

Wenzhi Xiao, Ruiting Xue, Yansheng Yin.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C(10)H(8)N(2C(8)H(7)NO(4), contains two half-mol-ecules, which constitute a 1:1 co-crystal. The 2-amino-terephthalic acid mol-ecule is situated on an inversion center being disordered between two orientations in a 1:1 ratio. In the 4,4'-bipyridine mol-ecule, which is situated on a twofold rotational axis, the two pyridine rings form a dihedral angle of 37.5 (1)°. In the crystal, mol-ecules are held together via inter-molecular N-H⋯O and O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds. The crystal packing exhibits π-π inter-actions between the aromatic rings with a centroid-centroid distance of 3.722 (3) Å.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21754729      PMCID: PMC3120464          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the crystal structures of polymeric coordination polymers with 2-amino­terephthalic acid linkers, see: Ma et al. (2005) ▶; Bauer et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H8N2·C8H7NO4 M = 337.33 Monoclinic, a = 16.9501 (18) Å b = 11.1959 (13) Å c = 9.251 (1) Å β = 116.986 (2)° V = 1564.4 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.10 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.33 × 0.19 × 0.11 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.967, T max = 0.989 3865 measured reflections 1370 independent reflections 894 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.075

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.067 wR(F 2) = 0.199 S = 1.00 1370 reflections 118 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.32 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.29 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016448/cv5085sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016448/cv5085Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016448/cv5085Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H8N2·C8H7NO4F(000) = 704
Mr = 337.33Dx = 1.432 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 16.9501 (18) ÅCell parameters from 1178 reflections
b = 11.1959 (13) Åθ = 2.3–26.0°
c = 9.251 (1) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
β = 116.986 (2)°T = 293 K
V = 1564.4 (3) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 40.33 × 0.19 × 0.11 mm
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer1370 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube894 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.075
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −20→12
Tmin = 0.967, Tmax = 0.989k = −11→13
3865 measured reflectionsl = −10→10
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.067Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.199H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1295P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1370 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
118 parametersΔρmax = 0.32 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.29 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
N10.8270 (3)0.9576 (4)−0.0096 (6)0.0607 (13)0.50
H1A0.83171.01340.05770.073*0.50
H1B0.84780.9678−0.07790.073*0.50
N20.39951 (15)0.8071 (2)1.0092 (3)0.0600 (7)
O10.67530 (15)0.82272 (19)0.2964 (3)0.0742 (8)
H10.65500.80970.36020.111*
O20.65519 (15)0.62839 (19)0.2565 (3)0.0711 (7)
C10.68006 (18)0.7229 (3)0.2283 (3)0.0520 (8)
C20.71594 (15)0.7367 (2)0.1106 (3)0.0436 (7)
C30.75521 (17)0.8419 (2)0.1014 (3)0.0459 (7)
H30.75950.90410.17130.055*
C40.78845 (17)0.8581 (2)−0.0081 (3)0.0462 (7)
H40.81340.9307−0.01400.055*0.50
C50.39774 (19)0.9000 (3)0.9217 (3)0.0594 (8)
H50.36890.96850.92950.071*
C60.43583 (18)0.9020 (2)0.8196 (3)0.0529 (8)
H60.43280.97070.76060.063*
C70.47874 (16)0.8020 (2)0.8042 (3)0.0451 (7)
C80.47940 (19)0.7037 (3)0.8939 (3)0.0564 (8)
H80.50620.63310.88610.068*
C90.4404 (2)0.7104 (3)0.9947 (4)0.0646 (9)
H90.44270.64361.05630.077*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.094 (4)0.048 (2)0.071 (3)−0.013 (2)0.064 (3)−0.013 (2)
N20.0592 (15)0.0888 (17)0.0500 (14)−0.0024 (13)0.0404 (13)0.0035 (12)
O10.1089 (18)0.0821 (14)0.0749 (15)0.0006 (12)0.0797 (15)−0.0074 (11)
O20.0983 (17)0.0765 (14)0.0719 (15)0.0073 (12)0.0679 (14)0.0144 (11)
C10.0551 (16)0.0688 (19)0.0402 (15)0.0119 (14)0.0287 (13)0.0078 (13)
C20.0456 (14)0.0573 (15)0.0366 (14)0.0069 (12)0.0264 (12)0.0046 (11)
C30.0504 (15)0.0575 (15)0.0381 (14)0.0071 (12)0.0273 (13)−0.0029 (11)
C40.0520 (16)0.0550 (15)0.0440 (15)0.0023 (12)0.0324 (13)0.0046 (11)
C50.0643 (18)0.0808 (19)0.0509 (18)0.0050 (15)0.0416 (16)−0.0027 (14)
C60.0640 (17)0.0658 (17)0.0448 (15)0.0036 (14)0.0385 (14)0.0031 (12)
C70.0429 (14)0.0644 (16)0.0342 (13)−0.0031 (12)0.0229 (12)−0.0010 (11)
C80.0624 (17)0.0661 (17)0.0552 (17)0.0057 (14)0.0394 (15)0.0089 (13)
C90.073 (2)0.0802 (19)0.0576 (18)−0.0005 (16)0.0443 (17)0.0180 (15)
N1—C41.295 (5)C3—H30.9300
N1—H1A0.8600C4—C2i1.403 (4)
N1—H1B0.8600C4—H40.9300
N2—C51.310 (3)C5—C61.365 (3)
N2—C91.325 (4)C5—H50.9300
O1—C11.304 (3)C6—C71.378 (3)
O1—H10.8200C6—H60.9300
O2—C11.210 (3)C7—C81.376 (3)
C1—C21.476 (4)C7—C7ii1.477 (5)
C2—C31.374 (4)C8—C91.368 (4)
C2—C4i1.403 (4)C8—H80.9300
C3—C41.376 (4)C9—H90.9300
C4—N1—H1A120.0C3—C4—H4120.5
C4—N1—H1B120.0C2i—C4—H4120.5
H1A—N1—H1B120.0N2—C5—C6123.8 (3)
C5—N2—C9116.9 (2)N2—C5—H5118.1
C1—O1—H1109.5C6—C5—H5118.1
O2—C1—O1122.8 (3)C5—C6—C7119.7 (3)
O2—C1—C2123.5 (3)C5—C6—H6120.1
O1—C1—C2113.7 (3)C7—C6—H6120.1
C3—C2—C4i119.0 (2)C8—C7—C6116.6 (2)
C3—C2—C1120.6 (2)C8—C7—C7ii122.47 (18)
C4i—C2—C1120.4 (2)C6—C7—C7ii120.88 (17)
C2—C3—C4122.0 (2)C9—C8—C7119.5 (3)
C2—C3—H3119.0C9—C8—H8120.2
C4—C3—H3119.0C7—C8—H8120.2
N1—C4—C3119.8 (3)N2—C9—C8123.4 (3)
N1—C4—C2i121.1 (3)N2—C9—H9118.3
C3—C4—C2i119.0 (2)C8—C9—H9118.3
N1—C4—H43.0
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O2iii0.862.082.931 (5)172
N1—H1B···O2i0.861.952.619 (5)133
O1—H1···N2ii0.821.822.635 (3)170
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O2i0.862.082.931 (5)172
N1—H1B⋯O2ii0.861.952.619 (5)133
O1—H1⋯N2iii0.821.822.635 (3)170

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  High-throughput assisted rationalization of the formation of metal organic frameworks in the Iron(III) aminoterephthalate solvothermal system.

Authors:  Sebastian Bauer; Christian Serre; Thomas Devic; Patricia Horcajada; Jérôme Marrot; Gérard Férey; Norbert Stock
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 5.165

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  N,N'-Bis(pyridin-3-yl)terephthalamide-terephthalic acid (1/1).

Authors:  Ji-Lin Lu; Xue-Wen Liu; Lin Li; Yuan-Dao Chen; Guang-Yu Shen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-10-29

2.  2-Amino-terephthalic acid N,N-dimethyl-formamide disolvate.

Authors:  Stefan Loos; Wilhelm Seichter; Edwin Weber; Florian Mertens
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-07-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.