Literature DB >> 21754721

rac-2,2'-Bipiperidine-1,1'-diium dibromide.

Marju Laars1, Kerti Ausmees, Marina Kudrjashova, Tõnis Kanger, Franz Werner.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(10)H(22)N(2) (2+)·2Br(-), a precursor in the synthesis of organocatalysts, the bipiperidinium ion is located on a twofold rotation axis which passes through the mid-point of the central C-C bond. The piperidinium ring adopts a chair conformation. In the crystal, the cations are linked together by Br(-) ions through N-H⋯Br hydrogen bonds, forming layers parallel to the ab plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21754721      PMCID: PMC3120339          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the synthesis, see: Krumholz (1953 ▶); Herrmann et al. (2006 ▶). For the application of N-substituted enanti­opure derivatives of the title compound in organocatalysis, see: Laars et al. (2008 ▶). For details of the CuII–catalysed Henry reaction, see: Noole et al. (2010 ▶). For related structures, see: Sato et al. (1982 ▶); Baran et al. (1992a ▶,b ▶); Intini et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H22N2 2+·2Br M = 330.12 Monoclinic, a = 11.789 (2) Å b = 10.6403 (18) Å c = 11.6632 (17) Å β = 107.687 (5)° V = 1393.9 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 5.79 mm−1 T = 300 K 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART X2S diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.151, T max = 0.391 4225 measured reflections 1225 independent reflections 1012 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.068

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.038 wR(F 2) = 0.093 S = 1.08 1224 reflections 70 parameters H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.47 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.94 e Å−3 Data collection: GIS (Bruker, 2010 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016084/is2700sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016084/is2700Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811016084/is2700Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H22N22+·2BrF(000) = 664
Mr = 330.12Dx = 1.573 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 1621 reflections
a = 11.789 (2) Åθ = 2.6–24.9°
b = 10.6403 (18) ŵ = 5.79 mm1
c = 11.6632 (17) ÅT = 300 K
β = 107.687 (5)°Prism, colourless
V = 1393.9 (4) Å30.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4
Bruker SMART X2S diffractometer1225 independent reflections
Radiation source: XOS X-beam microfocus source1012 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
doubly curved silicon crystalRint = 0.068
ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −13→14
Tmin = 0.151, Tmax = 0.391k = −12→12
4225 measured reflectionsl = −13→13
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.093H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.08w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.P)2 + 0.0285P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1224 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
70 parametersΔρmax = 0.47 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.94 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.19514 (3)0.07309 (4)0.77393 (4)0.0429 (2)
N10.1066 (3)0.1990 (3)0.1590 (3)0.0319 (7)
H1NA0.156 (3)0.271 (4)0.183 (3)0.038*
H1NB0.146 (3)0.132 (4)0.202 (4)0.038*
C1−0.0106 (3)0.2219 (3)0.1814 (3)0.0287 (8)
H1−0.06300.15100.14730.034*
C2−0.0661 (3)0.3394 (4)0.1136 (3)0.0385 (9)
H2A−0.14230.35530.12650.046*
H2B−0.01480.41110.14380.046*
C3−0.0836 (4)0.3232 (5)−0.0213 (4)0.0524 (11)
H3A−0.13930.2553−0.05260.063*
H3B−0.11690.3997−0.06350.063*
C40.0349 (4)0.2940 (4)−0.0433 (3)0.0489 (11)
H4A0.02130.2782−0.12840.059*
H4B0.08720.3662−0.02080.059*
C50.0944 (4)0.1811 (4)0.0280 (4)0.0442 (10)
H5A0.04740.1064−0.00170.053*
H5B0.17250.16940.01820.053*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0502 (3)0.0283 (3)0.0495 (4)−0.01100 (16)0.0142 (3)−0.00332 (18)
N10.0415 (17)0.0201 (16)0.0361 (19)0.0024 (14)0.0146 (16)0.0033 (15)
C10.0344 (18)0.0208 (18)0.031 (2)−0.0017 (15)0.0101 (16)−0.0031 (17)
C20.042 (2)0.034 (2)0.037 (2)0.0072 (18)0.0088 (19)0.0033 (19)
C30.069 (3)0.053 (3)0.029 (2)0.006 (2)0.005 (2)0.004 (2)
C40.075 (3)0.044 (3)0.031 (2)−0.004 (2)0.020 (2)0.000 (2)
C50.068 (3)0.033 (2)0.040 (2)−0.006 (2)0.030 (2)−0.012 (2)
N1—C11.501 (4)C2—H2A0.9700
N1—C51.503 (5)C3—C41.528 (5)
N1—H1NB0.92 (4)C3—H3A0.9700
N1—H1NA0.95 (4)C3—H3B0.9700
C1—C21.517 (5)C4—C51.508 (6)
C1—C1i1.542 (6)C4—H4A0.9700
C1—H10.9800C4—H4B0.9700
C2—C31.533 (5)C5—H5A0.9700
C2—H2B0.9700C5—H5B0.9700
C1—N1—C5112.9 (3)C4—C3—C2110.5 (3)
C1—N1—H1NB112 (2)C4—C3—H3A109.5
C5—N1—H1NB110 (2)C2—C3—H3A109.5
C1—N1—H1NA109 (2)C4—C3—H3B109.5
C5—N1—H1NA106 (2)C2—C3—H3B109.5
H1NB—N1—H1NA107 (3)H3A—C3—H3B108.1
N1—C1—C2108.5 (3)C5—C4—C3111.4 (3)
N1—C1—C1i108.3 (3)C5—C4—H4A109.3
C2—C1—C1i116.7 (2)C3—C4—H4A109.3
N1—C1—H1107.7C5—C4—H4B109.3
C2—C1—H1107.7C3—C4—H4B109.3
C1i—C1—H1107.7H4A—C4—H4B108.0
C1—C2—C3110.2 (3)N1—C5—C4110.2 (3)
C1—C2—H2B109.6N1—C5—H5A109.6
C3—C2—H2B109.6C4—C5—H5A109.6
C1—C2—H2A109.6N1—C5—H5B109.6
C3—C2—H2A109.6C4—C5—H5B109.6
H2B—C2—H2A108.1H5A—C5—H5B108.1
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1NA···Br1ii0.95 (4)2.36 (4)3.293 (3)168 (3)
N1—H1NB···Br1iii0.92 (4)2.34 (4)3.228 (3)162 (3)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1NA⋯Br1i0.95 (4)2.36 (4)3.293 (3)168 (3)
N1—H1NB⋯Br1ii0.92 (4)2.34 (4)3.228 (3)162 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  NMR and X-ray structural characterization of a cisplatin analogue able to slow down the Pt-N7 rotation of a coordinated guanine base by a billion-fold times: 2,2'-bipiperidine(dimethylmalonato)platinum(II) complex.

Authors:  Francesco P Intini; Renzo Cini; Gabriella Tamasi; Michael B Hursthouse; Giovanni Natile
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Enantioselective Henry reaction catalyzed by Cu(II) salt and bipiperidine.

Authors:  Artur Noole; Kristin Lippur; Andrus Metsala; Margus Lopp; Tõnis Kanger
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.354

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  (2R,2'S)-2,2'-Bi-piperidine-1,1'-diium dibromide.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Bruce C Noll; Elena V Rybak-Akimova
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-10-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.