Literature DB >> 21753048

Not all songbirds calibrate their magnetic compass from twilight cues: a telemetry study.

Nikita Chernetsov1, Dmitry Kishkinev, Vladislav Kosarev, Casimir V Bolshakov.   

Abstract

Migratory birds are able to use the sun and associated polarised light patterns, stellar cues and the geomagnetic field for orientation. No general agreement has been reached regarding the hierarchy of orientation cues. Recent data from naturally migrating North American Catharus thrushes suggests that they calibrate geomagnetic information daily from twilight cues. Similar results have been shown in caged birds in a few studies but not confirmed in others. We report that free-flying European migrants, song thrushes Turdus philomelos, released after pre-exposure to a horizontally rotated magnetic field, do not recalibrate their magnetic compass from solar cues, but rather show a simple domination of either the magnetic or the stellar compass. We suggest that different songbird species possess different hierarchies of orientation cues, depending on the geographic and ecological challenges met by the migrants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21753048     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.057729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  13 in total

1.  Polarized skylight does not calibrate the compass system of a migratory bat.

Authors:  Oliver Lindecke; Christian C Voigt; Gunārs Pētersons; Richard A Holland
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Compass systems.

Authors:  Nikita Chernetsov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Anthropogenic electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird.

Authors:  Svenja Engels; Nils-Lasse Schneider; Nele Lefeldt; Christine Maira Hein; Manuela Zapka; Andreas Michalik; Dana Elbers; Achim Kittel; P J Hore; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Wind selectivity and partial compensation for wind drift among nocturnally migrating passerines.

Authors:  James D McLaren; Judy Shamoun-Baranes; Willem Bouten
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Testing avian compass calibration: comparative experiments with diurnal and nocturnal passerine migrants in South Sweden.

Authors:  Susanne Åkesson; Catharina Odin; Ramón Hegedüs; Mihaela Ilieva; Christoffer Sjöholm; Alexandra Farkas; Gábor Horváth
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.422

6.  Stopover optimization in a long-distance migrant: the role of fuel load and nocturnal take-off time in Alaskan northern wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe).

Authors:  Heiko Schmaljohann; Fränzi Korner-Nievergelt; Beat Naef-Daenzer; Rolf Nagel; Ivan Maggini; Marc Bulte; Franz Bairlein
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  Migratory Reed Warblers Need Intact Trigeminal Nerves to Correct for a 1,000 km Eastward Displacement.

Authors:  Dmitry Kishkinev; Nikita Chernetsov; Dominik Heyers; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Re-calibration of the magnetic compass in hand-raised European robins (Erithacus rubecula).

Authors:  Bianca Alert; Andreas Michalik; Nadine Thiele; Michael Bottesch; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Migratory blackcaps can use their magnetic compass at 5 degrees inclination, but are completely random at 0 degrees inclination.

Authors:  Susanne Schwarze; Friederike Steenken; Nadine Thiele; Dmitry Kobylkov; Nele Lefeldt; David Dreyer; Nils-Lasse Schneider; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A New View on an Old Debate: Type of Cue-Conflict Manipulation and Availability of Stars Can Explain the Discrepancies between Cue-Calibration Experiments with Migratory Songbirds.

Authors:  Sissel Sjöberg; Rachel Muheim
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.