Literature DB >> 21752794

Smokers' self-reported responses to the introduction of reduced ignition propensity (RIP) cigarettes.

Andrew B Seidenberg1, Vaughan W Rees, Hillel R Alpert, Richard J O'Connor, Gary A Giovino, Andrew Hyland, Gregory N Connolly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Changes in cigarette design to meet mandated fire safety standards may have unintended effects on smoker responses by diminishing the consumer's perceptions of product acceptability, smoking and increasing fire-risk behaviours. To address these concerns, population-level data are needed from a jurisdiction where reduced ignition propensity (RIP) cigarettes have been introduced.
METHODS: A cohort of adult smokers was recruited in Massachusetts, U.S.A. using a random-digit-dialed telephone survey. The cohort was contacted prior to, and 8 months following, the state-mandated introduction of RIP cigarettes on 1 January 2008. Changes in self-reported subjective cigarette characteristics, smoking topography, fire-risk behaviours, fire events and quitting intentions were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 620 Massachusetts smokers completed the baseline survey conducted prior to implementation of the law, and 353 (57%) completed the follow-up survey conducted after implementation. No significant changes were found in self-reported fire-risk behaviour or quitting intentions. In addition, smokers were less likely to report smoking greater than 20 cigarettes per day and inhaling deeply into the chest after the law.
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of RIP cigarettes in Massachusetts yielded little change, and no adverse effect, on self-reported smoker response, among a sample of mostly Caucasian smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21752794      PMCID: PMC4528372          DOI: 10.1136/tc.2011.043257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  13 in total

1.  Does switching to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes alter smoking behavior or exposure to tobacco smoke constituents?

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Vaughan W Rees; Kaila J Norton; K Michael Cummings; Gregory N Connolly; Hillel R Alpert; Andreas Sjödin; Lovisa Romanoff; Zheng Li; Kristie M June; Gary A Giovino
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Ignition strength of 25 international cigarette brands.

Authors:  Andrew B Seidenberg; Vaughan W Rees; Hillel R Alpert; Richard J O'Connor; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  The impact of reduced ignition propensity cigarette regulation on smoking behaviour in a cohort of Ontario smokers.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Brian V Fix; David Hammond; Gary A Giovino; Andrew Hyland; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 4.  Assessing internal tobacco industry knowledge of the neurobiology of tobacco dependence.

Authors:  Geoffrey Ferris Wayne; Gregory N Connolly; Jack E Henningfield
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Smokers' reactions to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes.

Authors:  R J O'Connor; G A Giovino; B V Fix; A Hyland; D Hammond; G T Fong; U Bauer; K M Cummings
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  The role of sensory perception in the development and targeting of tobacco products.

Authors:  Carrie M Carpenter; Geoffrey Ferris Wayne; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 7.  Nicotine and nonnicotine factors in cigarette addiction.

Authors:  Jed E Rose
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  The reliability and validity of self-reported puffing behavior: evidence from a cross-national study.

Authors:  Lion Shahab; David Hammond; Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Ron Borland; Bill King; Ann McNeill
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 9.  Nicotine addiction.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Recent Advances in Cigarette Ignition Propensity Research and Development.

Authors:  Hillel R Alpert; Richard J O'Connor; Ron Spalletta; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Fire Technol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.239

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the cigarette ignition propensity standard in preventing unintentional residential fires in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Hillel R Alpert; David C Christiani; E John Orav; Douglas W Dockery; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Impact of reduced ignition propensity cigarette regulation on consumer smoking behavior and quit intentions: evidence from 6 waves (2004-11) of the ITC Four Country Survey.

Authors:  Sarah E Adkison; Richard J O'Connor; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; K Michael Cummings; David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.600

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.