Literature DB >> 16436405

Smokers' reactions to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes.

R J O'Connor1, G A Giovino, B V Fix, A Hyland, D Hammond, G T Fong, U Bauer, K M Cummings.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: On 28 June 2004, New York State (NY) became the first jurisdiction to require cigarettes to meet a reduced ignition propensity (RIP) standard. This law resulted in cigarette manufacturers modifying nearly all of their brands sold in NY. However, the same cigarette brands sold in other states were not modified to meet the RIP standard.
OBJECTIVES: This paper examines relationships between the RIP law and smokers' awareness of changes in the performance of their cigarettes (that is, going out more frequently, change in taste), and smoking behaviour.
METHODS: Data for this analysis come from a nationwide survey of 2088 adult smokers (> 18 years of age) conducted in the USA between July and December 2004. 143 of the smokers included in the survey were residents of NY while the remainder were from other states (n = 1945). Survey participants were asked whether their cigarettes "ever go out between puffs" and whether they had noticed any change in the taste of their cigarettes in the past 12 months.
RESULTS: NY smokers were three times more likely than smokers in other states to report that their cigarettes often went out between puffs (17.3% v 5.6%). However, NY smokers appeared no more likely to report noticing differences in cigarette taste, an intention to quit smoking, or to have made quit attempts.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant minority of smokers in NY reported noticing changes in the performance of their cigarettes following the RIP law, as would be expected. However, the RIP law appears to have had no impact on the smoking habits of New Yorkers, countering arguments made by cigarette manufacturers that the law would impact consumer acceptability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16436405      PMCID: PMC2563630          DOI: 10.1136/tc.2005.013532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  5 in total

1.  How the tobacco industry continues to keep the home fires burning.

Authors:  A McGuire
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  The case for fire safe cigarettes made through industry documents.

Authors:  M Gunja; G Ferris Wayne; A Landman; G Connolly; A McGuire
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Fire injuries, disasters, and costs from cigarettes and cigarette lights: a global overview.

Authors:  B N Leistikow; D C Martin; C E Milano
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Time to legislate for fire-safe cigarettes in Australia.

Authors:  Simon Chapman; Antony Balmain
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Effect of the New York State cigarette fire safety standard on ignition propensity, smoke constituents, and the consumer market.

Authors:  G N Connolly; H R Alpert; V Rees; C Carpenter; G F Wayne; D Vallone; H Koh
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.552

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Does switching to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes alter smoking behavior or exposure to tobacco smoke constituents?

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Vaughan W Rees; Kaila J Norton; K Michael Cummings; Gregory N Connolly; Hillel R Alpert; Andreas Sjödin; Lovisa Romanoff; Zheng Li; Kristie M June; Gary A Giovino
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 2.  Building the evidence base for effective tobacco control policies: the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (the ITC Project).

Authors:  G T Fong; K M Cummings; D R Shopland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project.

Authors:  G T Fong; K M Cummings; R Borland; G Hastings; A Hyland; G A Giovino; D Hammond; M E Thompson
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Smokers' self-reported responses to the introduction of reduced ignition propensity (RIP) cigarettes.

Authors:  Andrew B Seidenberg; Vaughan W Rees; Hillel R Alpert; Richard J O'Connor; Gary A Giovino; Andrew Hyland; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Prevalence of behaviors related to cigarette-caused fires: a survey of Ontario smokers.

Authors:  R J O'Connor; J E Bauer; G A Giovino; D Hammond; A Hyland; G T Fong; K M Cummings
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.399

6.  Impact of reduced ignition propensity cigarette regulation on consumer smoking behavior and quit intentions: evidence from 6 waves (2004-11) of the ITC Four Country Survey.

Authors:  Sarah E Adkison; Richard J O'Connor; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; K Michael Cummings; David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.