OBJECTIVE: Patients with persistent/recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer/primary peritoneal cancer (EOC/PPC) have limited treatment options. AKT and PI3K pathway activation is common in EOC/PPC, resulting in constitutive activation of downstream mTOR. The GOG conducted a phase II evaluation of efficacy and safety for the mTOR inhibitor, temsirolimus in EOC/PPC and explored circulating tumor cells (CTC) and AKT/mTOR/downstream tumor markers. METHODS: Eligible women with measurable, persistent/recurrent EOC/PPC who had received 1-3 prior regimens were treated with 25mg weekly IV temsirolimus until progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) ≥6-months, tumor response, and toxicity. CellSearch® system was used to examine CTC, and AKT/mTOR/downstream markers were evaluated by archival tumor immunohistochemistry. Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficient (r) and Cox regression modeling were used to explore marker associations with baseline characteristics and outcome. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled in a two-stage sequential design. Of 54 eligible and evaluable patients, 24.1% (90% CI 14.9%-38.6%) had PFS ≥6 months (median 3.1 months), 9.3% (90% CI 3.7%-23.4%) experienced a partial response. Grade 3/4 adverse events included metabolic (8), gastrointestinal (8), pain (6), constitutional (5) and pulmonary (4). Suggested associations were between cyclin D1 and PFS ≥6 months, PFS or survival; positive CTC pre-treatment and lack of response; and high CTC expression of M30 and PFS ≥6 months/longer PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Temsirolimus appears to have modest activity in persistent/recurrent EOC/PPC; however, PFS is just below that required to warrant inclusion in phase III studies in unselected patients. Cyclin D1 as a selection marker and CTC measures merit further study. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE:Patients with persistent/recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer/primary peritoneal cancer (EOC/PPC) have limited treatment options. AKT and PI3K pathway activation is common in EOC/PPC, resulting in constitutive activation of downstream mTOR. The GOG conducted a phase II evaluation of efficacy and safety for the mTOR inhibitor, temsirolimus in EOC/PPC and explored circulating tumor cells (CTC) and AKT/mTOR/downstream tumor markers. METHODS: Eligible women with measurable, persistent/recurrent EOC/PPC who had received 1-3 prior regimens were treated with 25mg weekly IV temsirolimus until progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) ≥6-months, tumor response, and toxicity. CellSearch® system was used to examine CTC, and AKT/mTOR/downstream markers were evaluated by archival tumor immunohistochemistry. Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficient (r) and Cox regression modeling were used to explore marker associations with baseline characteristics and outcome. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled in a two-stage sequential design. Of 54 eligible and evaluable patients, 24.1% (90% CI 14.9%-38.6%) had PFS ≥6 months (median 3.1 months), 9.3% (90% CI 3.7%-23.4%) experienced a partial response. Grade 3/4 adverse events included metabolic (8), gastrointestinal (8), pain (6), constitutional (5) and pulmonary (4). Suggested associations were between cyclin D1 and PFS ≥6 months, PFS or survival; positive CTC pre-treatment and lack of response; and high CTC expression of M30 and PFS ≥6 months/longer PFS. CONCLUSIONS:Temsirolimus appears to have modest activity in persistent/recurrent EOC/PPC; however, PFS is just below that required to warrant inclusion in phase III studies in unselected patients. Cyclin D1 as a selection marker and CTC measures merit further study. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Lydia Usha; Michael W Sill; Kathleen M Darcy; Doris M Benbrook; Jean A Hurteau; David P Michelin; Robert S Mannel; Parviz Hanjani; Koen De Geest; Andrew K Godwin Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: M Sun; G Wang; J E Paciga; R I Feldman; Z Q Yuan; X L Ma; S A Shelley; R Jove; P N Tsichlis; S V Nicosia; J Q Cheng Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Wei He; Sumith A Kularatne; Kimberly R Kalli; Franklyn G Prendergast; Robert J Amato; George G Klee; Lynn C Hartmann; Philip S Low Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Robert A Burger; Michael W Sill; Bradley J Monk; Benjamin E Greer; Joel I Sorosky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Russell J Schilder; Michael W Sill; Roger B Lee; Tanya J Shaw; Mary K Senterman; Andres J Klein-Szanto; Zoe Miner; Barbara C Vanderhyden Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rohann J M Correa; Yudith Ramos Valdes; Teresa M Peart; Elena N Fazio; Monique Bertrand; Jacob McGee; Michel Préfontaine; Akira Sugimoto; Gabriel E DiMattia; Trevor G Shepherd Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2014-02-22 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Elizabeth E Hopp; Stephanie M Cossette; Suresh N Kumar; Daniel Eastwood; Ramani Ramchandran; Erin Bishop Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Jeffrey B Smerage; G Thomas Budd; Gerald V Doyle; Marty Brown; Costanza Paoletti; Maria Muniz; M Craig Miller; Madeline I Repollet; David A Chianese; Mark C Connelly; Leon W W M Terstappen; Daniel F Hayes Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Marye J Boers-Sonderen; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Ingrid M E Desar; Winette T A van der Graaf; Wim J G Oyen; Petronella B Ottevanger; Carla M L van Herpen Journal: Target Oncol Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 4.493