| Literature DB >> 21752290 |
Yan Wang1, Peng Huang, Pei-Fu Tang, Kai-Ming Chan, Gang Li.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alendronate (ALN) is the most common form of bisphosphonates used for the treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) has also been shown to reduce osteoporotic changes in both humans and experimental animals after systemic administration. The aim of this current study was to test if the anti-resorption effects of ALN may be enhanced when used in combination with OPG.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21752290 PMCID: PMC3143091 DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-34
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Figure 1Diagram shows the experimental details of treatment in each animal group.
Figure 2Western blot analysis showed the RANKL protein expression in the vertebral bones at 12 weeks after receiving different treatments (24 weeks post-OVX). RANKL protein expression in the vertebrae was significantly increased in the OVX group compared to all other groups. If we use the RANKL protein expression in the OVX group as baseline level of 100%, the OPG-Fc treatment reduced the RANKL protein expression to 60% of baseline level; ALN treatment further reduced the RANKL protein expression to 40% of the baseline level; the RANKL protein expression in the OPG-Fc+ALN treated group and the sham control group was similar and was lowest among the groups, only 20% of the OVX group baseline level. *p < 0.05 when compared to the OVX group and there was no statistical difference among the tree treatment groups.
Urinary calcium excretion (mmol/L) in different treatment groups over time
| Treatment Groups | 12 wks after OVX (before treatment) | 24 wks after OVX (12 wks after treatment) |
|---|---|---|
| Sham | 1.61 ± 0.30 | 1.81 ± 0.45 |
| OVX | 1.69 ± 0.25 | 2.11 ± 0.39 a |
| OVX+ALN | 1.67 ± 0.30 | 1.89 ± 0.33 |
| OVX+OPG-Fc | 1.56 ± 0.31 | 1.43 ± 0.35 b |
| OVX+ALN+OPG-Fc | 1.51 ± 0.40 | 1.48 ± 0.45 b |
(a): Group had higher value than that of all other groups at the given time, p < 0.05.
(b): Group had significantly lower value than that of Sham, OVX and OVX+ALN groups, p < 0.05
Figure 3At 24 weeks post OVX (12 weeks following treatment), serum osteocalcin level decreased by 23% to the baseline level (sham group) in the ALN-treated group; 35% to the baseline level in the OPG-Fc-treated group; and 58% to the baseline level in the OPG+ALN-treated group, which was significantly reduced (#p < 0.05, Student's t-test) comparing to the sham group. There was no statistical difference among the three treatment groups.
Changes of BMD in L4-L6 vertebrae in different treatment groups over time
| Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Before OVX | 12 weeks post-OVX | 24 weeks post-OVX | |
| Sham | 0.21 ± 0.046 | 0.34 ± 0.023 | 0.37 ± 0.017 |
| OVX | 0.22 ± 0.039 | 0.27 ± 0.039 | 0.27 ± 0.022 |
| OVX+ALN | 0.21 ± 0.043 | 0.27 ± 0.039 | 0.37 ± 0.029 |
| OVX+OPG-Fc | 0.19 ± 0.038 | 0.23 ± 0.025 | 0.38 ± 0.026 |
| OVX+ALN+OPG-Fc | 0.19 ± 0.034 | 0.27 ± 0.020 | 0.36 ± 0.027 |
(a): Group had significantly lower value than that of all the other groups at the given time, p < 0.05.
Mechanical properties of L3 vertebra and femoral shaft at 24 weeks post-OVX
| Groups (L3 vertebra) | Ultimate load (N) | Ultimate stress (N/mm2) |
|---|---|---|
| Sham | 314.89 ± 22.87 | 46.30 ± 2.65 |
| OVX | 217.46 ± 33.04a | 27.88 ± 4.23 a |
| OVX+ALN | 294.75 ± 25.58 | 37.79 ± 2.78 |
| OVX+OPG-Fc | 275.30 ± 28.77 | 35.29 ± 1.35 |
| OVX+ALN+OPG-Fc | 312.91 ± 41.76 b | 40.12 ± 2.53 b |
| Sham | 125.79 ± 11.19 | 187.14 ± 33.01 |
| OVX | 104.88 ± 6.21 a | 146.57 ± 12.75 a |
| OVX+ALN | 130.83 ± 9.11 | 179.91 ± 13.01 |
| OVX+OPG-Fc | 124.72 ± 6.78 | 174.65 ± 12.15 |
| OVX+ALN+OPG-Fc | 127.55 ± 7.49 b | 176.89 ± 17.44 b |
Data were presented as mean ± SEM.
(a): Group had significantly lower value than that of the sham group at the given time, p < 0.01.
(b): Group had significantly higher value than that of the OVX group at the given time, p < 0.01.
Histomorphometric data at 24 weeks post-OVX in metaphyseal regions of the tibiae
| Treatment Group | Tb.Ar (%) | Trabecular thickness (μm) | Min. surface (%) | Mineral apposition rate (μm/day) | BFR/BS (μm/day) | Osteoclast number (no/mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 49.0 ± 9.23 a | 74.2 ± 11.34 a | 21.4 ± 3.3 a | 0.7 ± 0.13 a | 16.2 ± 1.45 a | 0.36 ± 0.03 a |
| OVX | 11.6 ± 5.81 | 45.2 ± 10.61 | 33.2 ± 4.6 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 35.7 ± 2.30 | 1.12 ± 10.61 |
| OVX+ALN | 59.7 ± 8.29 a | 90.0 ± 17.65 a,b | 28.1 ± 1.44 a | 0.9 ± 0.0 a | 24.6 ± 1.11 a | 0.24 ± 0.04 a,b |
| OVX+OPG-Fc | 44.5 ± 6.72 a | 71.1 ± 27.19 a | 27.8 ± 2.17 a | 0.7 ± 0.0 a | 23.1 ± 2.11 a | 0.15 ± 0.04 a,b |
| OVX+ALN+OPG-Fc | 62.3 ± 9.34 a, b | 93.7 ± 13.97 a,b | 22.1 ± 3.71 a | 0.6 ± 0.09 a | 17.7 ± 1.94 a | 0.05 ± 0.00 a,b |
Data were presented as mean ± SEM.
(a): Group had significantly higher or lower value than that of the OVX group, p < 0.05.
(b): Group had significantly higher or lower value than that of the sham group, p < 0.05.
Figure 4Representatives of the distal tibiae macroscopic and histological appearances of different groups at 24 weeks post-OVX. Top panel represents digital photographs of 200-μm thick sections (bar = 1 mm); bottom panel are representatives H&E histological sections from the boxed metaphyseal regions of the top panel (bar = 100 μm). The trabecular bone volume at the metaphyseal region of the tibiae in the OVX group had reduced markedly; both OPG-Fc and ALN-treated groups had greater bone volumes than that in the OVX group; and the OPG-Fc+ALN-treated group had the greatest bone volumes, which appeared to be even greater than that in the sham group.