| Literature DB >> 23606836 |
Ying Wu1, Jianghua Liu, Hui Guo, Qiong Luo, Ziying Yu, Eryuan Liao, Xuyu Zu.
Abstract
Osteoprotegerin (OPG) plays a determinant role in regulating bone metabolism, but the effect of OPG on bone microarchitecture needs to be further elucidated. We attempted to construct pCI-hOPGp-mOPG vector containing human OPG promoter and FLAG tag and to microinject vector into fertilized zygotes from C57BL/6J × CBA mice to prepare transgenic mice. The OPG transgenic positive mice were identified by PCR and western blotting. Twelve-week-old OPG transgenic mice (OPG-Tg mice) and wild-type mice (WT mice) were utilized in the study of bone microarchitecture. Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) data showed that compared with WT mice, the tibia of OPG-Tg mice showed an increased volumetric BMD (vBMD), tissue BMD (tBMD), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and trabecular number (Tb.N), and a decreased trabecular separation (Th.Sp) (P < 0.05) . The cortical bone microarchitecture parameters, such as cortical area (Ct.Ar), cortical thickness (Ct.Th), cortical BMD (Ct.BMD), cortical BMC (Ct.BMC), BMD, and BMC of femur, were increased, and the inner perimeter (In.Pm) was decreased, in OPG-Tg mice, compared to those in WT mice (P < 0.05). The established OPG transgenic mouse model could be valuable for further studying the biological significance and gene regulation of OPG in vivo.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23606836 PMCID: PMC3623394 DOI: 10.1155/2013/125932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 3.257
Figure 1Structure scheme of plasmids. (a) PCI-NEO-OPG-LacZ plasmid profile. (b) PCI-hOPGp-mOPG plasmid profile.
Figure 2Recombinant PCI-hOPGp-mOPG plasmid construction and plasmid linearization. (a) mCPG DNA was digested by Not I and Sal I. (b) PCI-NEO-OPG-LacZ was digested by restriction enzymes Not I and Sal. (c) Identification of the digested pCI-hOPG-mOPG.M:Marker1Kb Ladder. 1: pCI-hOPG-mOPG was digested by NotI and SalI; 2: pCI-hOPG-mOPG was digested by EcoRI; 3: pCI-hOPG-mOPG plasmid. (d) linear pCI-hOPGp-mOPG plasmid DNA.M:1KbLadder; 1: pCI-hOPG-mOPG palsmid; 2: pCI-hOPG-mOPG digested by BglII/KpnI; 3: pCI-hOPG-mOPG digested by BglII/KpnI was recovered.
Figure 3Identification of genotypes of OPG-Tg mice. (a) Identification of OPG genotypes in OPG-Tg founder mice; 1: GenenRuler 100 bp DNA Ladder; 2–17: mice samples; 18: ddH2O; 19: positive control. (b) Identification of young mice genotypes. M: GenenRuler100 bp DNA Ladder; 1–3: young pup samples; 4: ddH2O; 5-6: positive control. (c) OPG-Tg mice liver's western blot examination. 1–4: OPG-Tg mouse; 5: WT mouse; 6: H2O.
Femur overall bone mineral density and bone mineral content of two types of mice.
| BMD (mg/cm2) | BMC (mg) | |
|---|---|---|
| OPG-Tg | 32.3 ± 1.2a | 7.3 ± 1.1a |
| WT | 22.7 ± 0.9 | 2.9 ± 0.7 |
Values are means ± SD of 4 mice. a Compared with WT group, P < 0.05.
Figure 4Three-dimensional micro-CT images of the right tibia from two types of mice. (a) Image of the right tibia of OPG-Tg mice; (b) image of the right tibia of WT mice; (c) image of the cortex of OPG-Tg mice; (d) image of the cortex of WT mice; (e) image of the trabecular of OPG-Tg mice; (f) image of the trabecular of WT mice.
Comparison of trabecular bone structural parameter.
| WT | OPG-Tg | |
|---|---|---|
| vBMD (mg/mm3) | 207.9 ± 27.6 | 292.3 ± 30.1a |
| tBMD (mg/mm3) | 621.7 ± 26.9 | 694.5 ± 33.1a |
| Tb.Th (mm) | 0.015 ± 0.001 | 0.024 ± 0.002b |
| Tb.N (mm−1) | 3.11 ± 0.63 | 5.04 ± 0.82a |
| Tb.SP (mm) | 0.175 ± 0.021 | 0.092 ± 0.010b |
Values are means ± SD of 6 mice. a Compared with WT group, P < 0.05.
b Compared with WT group, P < 0.01.
Comparison of cortical bone structural parameter.
| WT | OPG-Tg | |
|---|---|---|
| In.Pm (mm) | 2.317 ± 0.098 | 1.961 ± 0.082a |
| Ot.Pm (mm) | 3.677 ± 0.271 | 3.881 ± 0.541 |
| Ct.Ar (mm2) | 0.263 ± 0.014 | 0.476 ± 0.032b |
| Ct.Th (mm) | 0.082 ± 0.001 | 0.191 ± 0.004b |
| Ct.BMD (mg/mm3) | 1017.3 ± 9.3 | 1176.8 ± 10.9b |
| Ct.BMC (g) | 0.0022 ± 0.0001 | 0.0048 ± 0.0006b |
Values are means ± SD of 6 mice. a Compared with WT group, P < 0.05.
b Compared with WT group, P < 0.01.