Literature DB >> 21751855

Effects of motion control footwear on running: a systematic review.

Roy T H Cheung1, Michael Y M Wong, Gabriel Y F Ng.   

Abstract

Excessive foot pronation is a risk factor of running injuries and motion control footwear is designed to control foot pronation. With the movement transfer between foot pronation and tibial rotation, motion control footwear may not only be confined to controlling foot pronation. In view of the controversies in the literature on effectiveness of motion control footwear, this paper reviewed the efficacy of motion control footwear functions as reported in the literature. Eligible studies were identified from seven electronic databases. Two independent authors extracted the data and assessed the methodological qualities using the Jadad Scale. A total of 14 quasi randomised controlled trials were included. Even though the included studies were rated as "low quality" according to the Jadad Scale, the data were pooled and analysed. Results revealed that motion control footwear was effective in reducing the amount of foot pronation and the peak vertical impact during landing. There is no evidence that suggests motion control footwear for controlling kinematics of the proximal segments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21751855     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2011.591420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  7 in total

1.  The Association Between Rearfoot Motion While Barefoot and Shod in Different Types of Running Shoes in Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Érica Q Silva; Andreia N Miana; Jane S S P Ferreira; Henry D Kiyomoto; Mauro C M E Dinato; Isabel C N Sacco
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Immediate effects of EVA midsole resilience and upper shoe structure on running biomechanics: a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Andrea N Onodera; Isabel Cn Sacco; Wilson P Gavião Neto; Maria Isabel Roveri; Wagner R Oliveira
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Differences and mechanisms underpinning a change in the knee flexion moment while running in stability and neutral footwear among young females.

Authors:  Timothy A Sayer; Rana S Hinman; Kade L Paterson; Kim L Bennell; Karine Fortin; J Kasza; Adam L Bryant
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 4.  Running Injury Paradigms and Their Influence on Footwear Design Features and Runner Assessment Methods: A Focused Review to Advance Evidence-Based Practice for Running Medicine Clinicians.

Authors:  Cristine Agresta; Christina Giacomazzi; Mark Harrast; Jessica Zendler
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-09

5.  Validation of the RunScribe inertial measurement unit for walking gait measurement.

Authors:  Max Lewin; Carina Price; Christopher Nester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Validity and Reliability of an Instrumented Treadmill with an Accelerometry System for Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Parameters and Impact Transmission.

Authors:  Alberto Encarnación-Martínez; Pedro Pérez-Soriano; Roberto Sanchis-Sanchis; Antonio García-Gallart; Rafael Berenguer-Vidal
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Effects of taping techniques on arch deformation in adults with pes planus: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meihua Tang; Lin Wang; Yanwei You; Jiajia Li; Xiaoyue Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.