Literature DB >> 21751294

Telephone peer support for women with gynaecological cancer: recipients' perspectives.

Nancy Pistrang1, Zara Jay, Sue Gessler, Chris Barker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Peer support is much valued by cancer patients. Previous research has focused on support groups, typically for women with breast cancer; little has addressed one-to-one support. This qualitative study examined a telephone-delivered one-to-one peer support intervention for women with gynaecological cancer, focusing on recipients' experiences of process and outcome.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 women recently treated for gynaecological cancer who had received peer support for up to a 3-month period. Transcripts were analysed thematically using the 'Framework' approach.
RESULTS: Six key components of the peer support process were identified: an emotional bond, empathy, talking openly, reciprocity, information and guidance, and humour. Their importance was highlighted by cases in which they were absent or problematic. Participants described several benefits, for example hope and confidence, making sense of the illness experience and rebuilding one's life. However, one-third reported limited or no benefits, although there was no evidence of adverse outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: One-to-one telephone peer support shares common features with support groups but is uniquely dependent on an effective working relationship between the support provider and recipient. Peer support can address the disease- and treatment-specific concerns of women with gynaecological cancer, as well as the adaptive tasks of recovery faced by cancer survivors. Further research needs to examine who is more or less likely to benefit from one-to-one peer support and which parameters of the intervention, such as duration and matching, influence its effectiveness. Patient-relevant outcomes should be included in future controlled trials.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21751294     DOI: 10.1002/pon.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  8 in total

Review 1.  Involvement of patients with lung and gynecological cancer and their relatives in psychosocial cancer rehabilitation: a narrative review.

Authors:  Bente Hoeck; Loni Ledderer; Helle Ploug Hansen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Toward structured peer support interventions in oncology: a qualitative insight into the experiences of gynaecological cancer survivors providing peer support.

Authors:  Ben Huntingdon; Penelope Schofield; Zahava Wolfowicz; Rebecca Bergin; Donna Kabel; Jennifer Edmunds; Sylvia Penberthy; Ilona Juraskova
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Improvement in quality of life and psychological well-being associated with a culturally based psychosocial intervention for Chinese American breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Qian Lu; Lingjun Chen; Lilian J Shin; Carol Wang; Lenna Dawkins-Moultin; Qiao Chu; Alice Loh; Lucy Young; Carol Wang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  Perceptions of care after end-of-treatment among younger women with different gynecologic cancer diagnoses - a qualitative analysis of written responses submitted via a survey.

Authors:  Elisabet Mattsson; Lisa Ljungman; Kim Einhorn; Inger Sundström Poromaa; Karin Stålberg; Anna Wikman
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Optimizing use of written peer support as a supportive resource in cancer: Focus group insights.

Authors:  Christine Rini; Margaret Waltz; Katrin Bovbjerg; David Farrell; Betina Yanez; Anthony Chicaiza; Madison L Hartstein; Rahma Omar; Rebecca Thompson; Scott D Rowley; Annette L Stanton; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Jane Austin; Alyssa N Van Denburg; Kristi D Graves
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 6.  Effectiveness of peer support on health-related quality of life in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anu Susanna Toija; Tarja Helena Kettunen; Marjut Hannele Kristiina Leidenius; Tarja Hellin Kaarina Vainiola; Risto Paavo Antero Roine
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Sexuality post gynaecological cancer treatment: a qualitative study with South African women.

Authors:  Sorrel Pitcher; Nazia Fakie; Tracey Adams; Lynette Denny; Jennifer Moodley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  "There's somebody like me": perspectives of a peer-to-peer gynecologic cancer mentorship program.

Authors:  Hannah Kang Moran; Joanna Veazey Brooks; Lori Spoozak
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.603

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.