OBJECTIVE: Peer support is much valued by cancer patients. Previous research has focused on support groups, typically for women with breast cancer; little has addressed one-to-one support. This qualitative study examined a telephone-delivered one-to-one peer support intervention for women with gynaecological cancer, focusing on recipients' experiences of process and outcome. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 women recently treated for gynaecological cancer who had received peer support for up to a 3-month period. Transcripts were analysed thematically using the 'Framework' approach. RESULTS: Six key components of the peer support process were identified: an emotional bond, empathy, talking openly, reciprocity, information and guidance, and humour. Their importance was highlighted by cases in which they were absent or problematic. Participants described several benefits, for example hope and confidence, making sense of the illness experience and rebuilding one's life. However, one-third reported limited or no benefits, although there was no evidence of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: One-to-one telephone peer support shares common features with support groups but is uniquely dependent on an effective working relationship between the support provider and recipient. Peer support can address the disease- and treatment-specific concerns of women with gynaecological cancer, as well as the adaptive tasks of recovery faced by cancer survivors. Further research needs to examine who is more or less likely to benefit from one-to-one peer support and which parameters of the intervention, such as duration and matching, influence its effectiveness. Patient-relevant outcomes should be included in future controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE: Peer support is much valued by cancerpatients. Previous research has focused on support groups, typically for women with breast cancer; little has addressed one-to-one support. This qualitative study examined a telephone-delivered one-to-one peer support intervention for women with gynaecological cancer, focusing on recipients' experiences of process and outcome. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 women recently treated for gynaecological cancer who had received peer support for up to a 3-month period. Transcripts were analysed thematically using the 'Framework' approach. RESULTS: Six key components of the peer support process were identified: an emotional bond, empathy, talking openly, reciprocity, information and guidance, and humour. Their importance was highlighted by cases in which they were absent or problematic. Participants described several benefits, for example hope and confidence, making sense of the illness experience and rebuilding one's life. However, one-third reported limited or no benefits, although there was no evidence of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: One-to-one telephone peer support shares common features with support groups but is uniquely dependent on an effective working relationship between the support provider and recipient. Peer support can address the disease- and treatment-specific concerns of women with gynaecological cancer, as well as the adaptive tasks of recovery faced by cancer survivors. Further research needs to examine who is more or less likely to benefit from one-to-one peer support and which parameters of the intervention, such as duration and matching, influence its effectiveness. Patient-relevant outcomes should be included in future controlled trials.
Authors: Ben Huntingdon; Penelope Schofield; Zahava Wolfowicz; Rebecca Bergin; Donna Kabel; Jennifer Edmunds; Sylvia Penberthy; Ilona Juraskova Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Qian Lu; Lingjun Chen; Lilian J Shin; Carol Wang; Lenna Dawkins-Moultin; Qiao Chu; Alice Loh; Lucy Young; Carol Wang Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Elisabet Mattsson; Lisa Ljungman; Kim Einhorn; Inger Sundström Poromaa; Karin Stålberg; Anna Wikman Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Christine Rini; Margaret Waltz; Katrin Bovbjerg; David Farrell; Betina Yanez; Anthony Chicaiza; Madison L Hartstein; Rahma Omar; Rebecca Thompson; Scott D Rowley; Annette L Stanton; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Jane Austin; Alyssa N Van Denburg; Kristi D Graves Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 3.955
Authors: Anu Susanna Toija; Tarja Helena Kettunen; Marjut Hannele Kristiina Leidenius; Tarja Hellin Kaarina Vainiola; Risto Paavo Antero Roine Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 3.603