Literature DB >> 21749194

Ethnic variation in body composition assessment in a sample of adolescent girls.

Katie A Meyer1, Sarah Friend, Peter J Hannan, John H Himes, Ellen W Demerath, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare body composition assessment by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a multiethnic sample of adolescent girls.
METHOD: Data were from a physical activity intervention study among 254 14-20-year-old sedentary American girls, including 69 whites, 74 blacks, 42 Hispanics, and 69 Asians. Height and weight were objectively measured. Body composition was assessed using a foot-to-foot BIA and a fan-beam DXA. We calculated ethnic-specific estimates of percentage body fat (BF%), fat mass (FM), fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass (FFM), and fat-free mass index (FFMI) from BIA and DXA. We used Bland-Altman plots to examine ethnic-specific agreement between BIA and DXA, and used linear regression to test whether the BIA-DXA difference varied across the mean.
RESULTS: Compared to DXA, BIA estimates of fat measures (BF%, FM, and FMI) were lower and lean tissue measures (FFM and FFMI) higher. For example, the BIA-estimated BF% was lower than the DXA estimate by between 4.9% (95% CI: -5.9, -3.9) in blacks and 8.7% (-7.0, -5.0) in Asians, with large limits of agreement (-15.4 to -5.4 in blacks and -16.8 to -0.4 in Asians). Regression analysis showed that BIA-DXA differences were not constant across means for any body composition measure among Asians or for any measure except BF% among whites.
CONCLUSION: Compared to DXA, BIA yielded lower estimates of adiposity in a multiethnic adolescent sample. BIA-DXA differences varied by ethnicity, and across mean body composition values for some ethnicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21749194      PMCID: PMC3174327          DOI: 10.3109/17477166.2011.596841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Obes        ISSN: 1747-7166


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in children.

Authors:  K Okasora; R Takaya; M Tokuda; Y Fukunaga; T Oguni; H Tanaka; K Konishi; H Tamai
Journal:  Pediatr Int       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.524

2.  The fatness-specific bioelectrical impedance analysis equations of Segal et al: are they generalizable and practical?

Authors:  L M Stolarczyk; V H Heyward; M D Van Loan; V L Hicks; W L Wilson; L M Reano
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Comparison of the validity of anthropometric and bioelectric impedance equations to assess body composition in adolescent girls.

Authors:  M Loftin; J Nichols; S Going; M Sothern; K H Schmitz; K Ring; G Tuuri; J Stevens
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2007

Review 4.  Body composition determination by bioimpedance: an update.

Authors:  Michel Y Jaffrin
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.294

5.  Validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis in adolescents across different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Dalia Haroun; Stephanie J C Taylor; Russell M Viner; Rachel S Hayward; Tegan S Darch; Simon Eaton; Tim J Cole; Jonathan C K Wells
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  QDR 4500A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer underestimates fat mass in comparison with criterion methods in adults.

Authors:  Dale A Schoeller; Frances A Tylavsky; David J Baer; William C Chumlea; Carrie P Earthman; Thomas Fuerst; Tamara B Harris; Steven B Heymsfield; Mary Horlick; Timothy G Lohman; Henry C Lukaski; John Shepherd; Roger M Siervogel; Lori G Borrud
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Prediction of fatness by standing 8-electrode bioimpedance: a multiethnic adolescent population.

Authors:  John D Sluyter; David Schaaf; Robert K R Scragg; Lindsay D Plank
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Measurement of percentage of body fat in 411 children and adolescents: a comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with a four-compartment model.

Authors:  Aviva B Sopher; John C Thornton; Jack Wang; Richard N Pierson; Steven B Heymsfield; Mary Horlick
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Memphis Girls health Enrichment Multi-site Studies (GEMS): Phase 2: design and baseline.

Authors:  Robert C Klesges; Eva Obarzanek; Lisa M Klesges; Michelle B Stockton; Bettina M Beech; David M Murray; Jennifer Q Lanctot; Deborah A Sherrill-Mittleman
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry body composition reference values from NHANES.

Authors:  Thomas L Kelly; Kevin E Wilson; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Regional analysis of soft tissue thickness on korean buttocks and application to fasciocutaneous flap design.

Authors:  Do Yup Kim; Hyun Nam Choi; Jin Hyung Park; Sin Rak Kim; Hyun Kim; Yea Sik Han
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-03-12

2.  Body fat assessment in youth with overweight or obesity by an automated bioelectrical impedance analysis device, in comparison with the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Hanen Samouda; Jérémie Langlet
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  Racial/ethnic differences in clinical and biochemical type 2 diabetes mellitus risk factors in children.

Authors:  Michael Rosenbaum; Ilene Fennoy; Siham Accacha; Lisa Altshuler; Dennis E Carey; Stephen Holleran; Robert Rapaport; Steven P Shelov; Phyllis W Speiser; S Ten; Amrit Bhangoo; Claudia Boucher-Berry; Yomery Espinal; Rishi Gupta; Abeer A Hassoun; Loretta Iazetti; Fabienne Jean-Jacques; Amy M Jean; Michelle L Klein; Robet Levine; Barbara Lowell; Lesley Michel; Warren Rosenfeld
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 5.002

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.