Literature DB >> 21748491

Using different schedules of Temozolomide to treat low grade gliomas: systematic review of their efficacy and toxicity.

Harsha Prasada Lashkari1, Srdjan Saso, Lucas Moreno, Thanos Athanasiou, Stergios Zacharoulis.   

Abstract

Low grade gliomas (LGG) contribute to 50% of all central nervous tumors in children and 15% of all gliomas in adults. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent with activity in high and LGG. Various regimens of TMZ are currently in use. We attempted to assess the impact of different TMZ regimens on the treatment of LGG. A systematic review of the literature identified all the studies published in Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases which met the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome measure was the impact of different TMZ regimens on the 12 month progression-free survival (PFS) rates of patients diagnosed with progressive LGG. Secondary outcome measures looked at the ability of the three regimens to elicit an objective response and the associated toxicity. Statistical pooling and calculation of weighted mean average of each proportion (WMAP) was conducted using a random-effects model. 18 studies (736 patients) were analyzed. PFS at 12 months revealed a WMAP of 0.61 (95% CI 0.44-0.78) for regimen A, 0.59 (0.28-0.89) for regimen B, and 0.91 (95% CI 0.83-0.99) for regimen C (Regimen A--200 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days, repeated every 4 weeks; B--75 mg/m(2)/day for 21 days repeated every 4 weeks; C--75 mg/m(2)/day for 7 weeks with 4 weeks of every 11 weeks). In terms of objective response, WMAP were 0.19 (95% 0.13-0.25), 0.27 (95% CI 0.15-0.39) and 0.21 (95% CI 0.10-0.32) for regimen A, B, C respectively. When analyzing hematological toxicity, WMAPs were 0.14 (95% 0.11-0.18), 0.35 (0.14-0.56) and 0.23 (95% CI 0.03-0.43). The bulk of evidence originates from the standard 5 day/month regimen A but with a lack of comparative studies. Analysis revealed significant heterogeneity. Although there is possibly an indication that metronomic regimens of TMZ result in better PFS and response rate when compared to the conventional standard 5 day regimen, insufficient available data and study heterogeneity preclude any safe conclusions. Well designed randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to establish the efficacy of metronomic regimens of TMZ in LGGs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21748491     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-011-0657-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  44 in total

Review 1.  Weighing the benefits and risks of radiation therapy for low-grade glioma.

Authors:  K Peterson; L M DeAngelis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  A phase II study of extended low-dose temozolomide in recurrent malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Raja B Khan; Jeffrey J Raizer; Mark G Malkin; Kimberley A Bazylewicz; Lauren E Abrey
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Carboplatin and vincristine chemotherapy for children with newly diagnosed progressive low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  R J Packer; J Ater; J Allen; P Phillips; R Geyer; H S Nicholson; R Jakacki; E Kurczynski; M Needle; J Finlay; G Reaman; J M Boyett
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Dose-dense regimen of temozolomide given every other week in patients with primary central nervous system tumors.

Authors:  K Vera; L Djafari; S Faivre; J-S Guillamo; K Djazouli; M Osorio; F Parker; C Cioloca; B Abdulkarim; J-P Armand; E Raymond
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Progressive low-grade oligodendrogliomas: response to temozolomide and correlation between genetic profile and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase protein expression.

Authors:  Netta Levin; Iris Lavon; Bracha Zelikovitsh; Dana Fuchs; Felix Bokstein; Yakov Fellig; Tali Siegal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Temozolomide chemotherapy for progressive low-grade glioma: clinical benefits and radiological response.

Authors:  A Pace; A Vidiri; E Galiè; M Carosi; S Telera; A M Cianciulli; P Canalini; D Giannarelli; B Jandolo; C M Carapella
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Temozolomide is active in childhood, progressive, unresectable, low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Dennis J Kuo; Howard L Weiner; Jeffrey Wisoff; Douglas C Miller; Edmond A Knopp; Jonathan L Finlay
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.289

8.  Temozolomide three weeks on and one week off as first line therapy for patients with recurrent or progressive low grade gliomas.

Authors:  A Tosoni; E Franceschi; M Ermani; R Bertorelle; L Bonaldi; V Blatt; Alba A Brandes
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Temozolomide for low-grade gliomas: predictive impact of 1p/19q loss on response and outcome.

Authors:  G Kaloshi; A Benouaich-Amiel; F Diakite; S Taillibert; J Lejeune; F Laigle-Donadey; M-A Renard; W Iraqi; A Idbaih; S Paris; L Capelle; H Duffau; P Cornu; J-M Simon; K Mokhtari; M Polivka; A Omuro; A Carpentier; M Sanson; J-Y Delattre; K Hoang-Xuan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules.

Authors:  A W Tolcher; S L Gerson; L Denis; C Geyer; L A Hammond; A Patnaik; A D Goetz; G Schwartz; T Edwards; L Reyderman; P Statkevich; D L Cutler; E K Rowinsky
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Profound prevention of experimental brain metastases of breast cancer by temozolomide in an MGMT-dependent manner.

Authors:  Diane Palmieri; Renata Duchnowska; Stephan Woditschka; Emily Hua; Yongzhen Qian; Wojciech Biernat; Katarzyna Sosińska-Mielcarek; Brunilde Gril; Andreas M Stark; Stephen M Hewitt; David J Liewehr; Seth M Steinberg; Jacek Jassem; Patricia S Steeg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Is low and slow the way to go? Metronomic therapy in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  David S Wolf; Kenneth J Cohen
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2013-05

3.  Chemotherapy disrupts learning, neurogenesis and theta activity in the adult brain.

Authors:  Miriam S Nokia; Megan L Anderson; Tracey J Shors
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Amino acid positron emission tomography to monitor chemotherapy response and predict seizure control and progression-free survival in WHO grade II gliomas.

Authors:  Ulrich Roelcke; Matthias T Wyss; Martha Nowosielski; Roberta Rudà; Patrick Roth; Silvia Hofer; Norbert Galldiks; Flavio Crippa; Michael Weller; Riccardo Soffietti
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Gliomas in children.

Authors:  Jane E Minturn; Michael J Fisher
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 6.  Conventional chemotherapy and perspectives for molecular-based oncological treatment in pediatric hemispheric low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  María Baro Fernández; Vanesa Pérez Alonso
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Treatment of children with high grade glioma with nimotuzumab: a 5-year institutional experience.

Authors:  Ricardo Cabanas; Giselle Saurez; Martha Rios; Jose Alert; Adnolys Reyes; Jose Valdes; Maria C Gonzalez; Jorge L Pedrayes; Melba Avila; Raiza Herrera; Mariela Infante; Ernesto Echevarria; Myrna Moreno; Patricia Lorenzo Luaces; Tania Crombet Ramos
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.857

8.  Survival trends of grade I, II, and III astrocytoma patients and associated clinical practice patterns between 1999 and 2010: A SEER-based analysis.

Authors:  Xuezhi Dong; Abraham Noorbakhsh; Brian R Hirshman; Tianzan Zhou; Jessica A Tang; David C Chang; Bob S Carter; Clark C Chen
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2015-07-01

9.  A European randomised controlled trial of the addition of etoposide to standard vincristine and carboplatin induction as part of an 18-month treatment programme for childhood (≤16 years) low grade glioma - A final report.

Authors:  Astrid K Gnekow; David A Walker; Daniela Kandels; Susan Picton; Jacques Grill; Tore Stokland; Per Eric Sandstrom; Monika Warmuth-Metz; Torsten Pietsch; Felice Giangaspero; René Schmidt; Andreas Faldum; Denise Kilmartin; Angela De Paoli; Gian Luca De Salvo
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 9.162

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.