Xuezhi Dong1, Abraham Noorbakhsh1, Brian R Hirshman1, Tianzan Zhou1, Jessica A Tang1, David C Chang1, Bob S Carter1, Clark C Chen1. 1. School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093 (X.D., A.N., B.R.H., T.Z., J.A.T.); Division of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive #8893, San Diego, California 92103 (B.S.C., C.C.C.); Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive #8220, San Diego, California 92103 (D.C.C.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The survival trends and the patterns of clinical practice pertaining to radiation therapy and surgical resection for WHO grade I, II, and III astrocytoma patients remain poorly characterized. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, we identified 2497 grade I, 4113 grade II, and 2755 grade III astrocytomas during the period of 1999-2010. Time-trend analyses were performed for overall survival, radiation treatment (RT), and the extent of surgical resection (EOR). RESULTS: While overall survival of grade I astrocytoma patients remained unchanged during the study period, we observed improved overall survival for grade II and III astrocytoma patients (Tarone-Ware P < .05). The median survival increased from 44 to 57 months and from 15 to 24 months for grade II and III astrocytoma patients, respectively. The differences in survival remained significant after adjusting for pertinent variables including age, ethnicity, marital status, sex, tumor size, tumor location, EOR, and RT status. The pattern of clinical practice in terms of EOR for grade II and III astrocytoma patients did not change significantly during this study period. However, there was decreased RT utilization as treatment for grade II astrocytoma patients after 2005. CONCLUSION: Results from the SEER database indicate that there were improvements in the overall survival of grade II and III astrocytoma patients over the past decade. Analysis of the clinical practice patterns identified potential opportunities for impacting the clinical course of these patients.
BACKGROUND: The survival trends and the patterns of clinical practice pertaining to radiation therapy and surgical resection for WHO grade I, II, and III astrocytoma patients remain poorly characterized. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, we identified 2497 grade I, 4113 grade II, and 2755 grade III astrocytomas during the period of 1999-2010. Time-trend analyses were performed for overall survival, radiation treatment (RT), and the extent of surgical resection (EOR). RESULTS: While overall survival of grade I astrocytoma patients remained unchanged during the study period, we observed improved overall survival for grade II and III astrocytoma patients (Tarone-Ware P < .05). The median survival increased from 44 to 57 months and from 15 to 24 months for grade II and III astrocytoma patients, respectively. The differences in survival remained significant after adjusting for pertinent variables including age, ethnicity, marital status, sex, tumor size, tumor location, EOR, and RT status. The pattern of clinical practice in terms of EOR for grade II and III astrocytoma patients did not change significantly during this study period. However, there was decreased RT utilization as treatment for grade II astrocytoma patients after 2005. CONCLUSION: Results from the SEER database indicate that there were improvements in the overall survival of grade II and III astrocytoma patients over the past decade. Analysis of the clinical practice patterns identified potential opportunities for impacting the clinical course of these patients.
Authors: Erwin G Van Meir; Costas G Hadjipanayis; Andrew D Norden; Hui-Kuo Shu; Patrick Y Wen; Jeffrey J Olson Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: M J van den Bent; D Afra; O de Witte; M Ben Hassel; S Schraub; K Hoang-Xuan; P-O Malmström; L Collette; M Piérart; R Mirimanoff; A B M F Karim Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Sep 17-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Elizabeth B Claus; Andres Horlacher; Liangge Hsu; Richard B Schwartz; Donna Dello-Iacono; Florian Talos; Ferenc A Jolesz; Peter M Black Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Matthew J McGirt; Kaisorn L Chaichana; Frank J Attenello; Jon D Weingart; Khoi Than; Peter C Burger; Alessandro Olivi; Henry Brem; Alfredo Quinoñes-Hinojosa Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: A Pace; A Vidiri; E Galiè; M Carosi; S Telera; A M Cianciulli; P Canalini; D Giannarelli; B Jandolo; C M Carapella Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: G Cairncross; D Macdonald; S Ludwin; D Lee; T Cascino; J Buckner; D Fulton; E Dropcho; D Stewart; C Schold Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M J van den Bent; J M Kros; J J Heimans; L C Pronk; C J van Groeningen; H G Krouwer; M J Taphoorn; B A Zonnenberg; C C Tijssen; A Twijnstra; C J Punt; W Boogerd Journal: Neurology Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Kris A Smith; Benjamin K Hendricks; Joseph D DiDomenico; Beth N Conway; Tracy L Smith; Amir Azadi; Ekokobe Fonkem Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-06-30