| Literature DB >> 21747699 |
Bin Gao1, Lijiang Yu, Yanhua Qu, Gang Song, Chuanyin Dai, Ruiying Zhang, Zuohua Yin, Kaifeng Wang, Xuebin Gao, Shou-Hsien Li, Fumin Lei.
Abstract
Recent phylogeographical studies indicated that glacial oscillations played a key role on the phylogeographic pattern of extant species. As most studies have previously been carried out on heavily ice-covered regions, such as in European and North American regions, potential effects of climatic oscillations on species that are distributed on ice-free regions are less known. To address this, we investigated the phylogeographic pattern of an avian species endemic to South China, which was not glaciated during the Pleistocene glaciations. By using 2142 bp mitochondrial DNA, we identified 89 haplotypes defined by 39 polymorphic sites. A combination of high haplotype diversity (0.786-1.00) and low nucleotide diversity (0.00132-0.00252) was detected among geographic populations. Explicit genetic divergence was observed between S. s. semitorques and S. s. cinereicapillus but not detected among geographic populations of S. s. semitorques. Divergence time of the two subspecies was dated back to 87 Kyr which is congruent with the interglacial MIS 5. A weak phylogeographic structure due to strong gene flow among geographic populations was identified in this species, suggesting complex topography of South China has not formed barriers for this species.Entities:
Keywords: Collared Finchbill; East Asia; phylogeography; unglaciated region
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21747699 PMCID: PMC3131583 DOI: 10.3390/ijms12063635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Haplotypes median-joining network for Collared Finchbill generated by NETWORK 4.6.
Neutrality test for geographic populations.
| Statistics | GSWX | SXFP | SCGY | SCYA | SNJ | JXJGS | HNYJ | GZGD | AHJX | FJ | TAIPEI |
| Tajima’s | −0.933 | −1.633 | −0.109 | −0.7064 | −0.996 | −0.694 | −0.591 | −0.691 | −0.986 | −1.199 | −0.894 |
| NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Fu’s | −4.843 | −12.75 | −1.283 | −3.336 | −2.752 | −1.908 | −5.719 | −6.401 | −2.764 | −1.554 | −1.633 |
| <0.01 | 0.00 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Fu and Li’s | −1.313 | −2.803 | −0.109 | −0.640 | −1.270 | −0.798 | −0.765 | −1.360 | −1.370 | −1.199 | −0.894 |
| NS | < 0.05 | NS | NS | NS | NS | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | NS | NS | NS | |
Note: Three neutrality test parameters and statistical p values were calculated by DnaSP 5.0.
AMOVA analyses of Collared Finchbill.
| Group | Among groups (AG) | Among populations within groups(AP) | Within populations (WP) | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCT | FSC | FST | ||
| 2 Groups | 0.5043 | 0.0098 | 0.5092 | Among groups:50.44 |
| 6 Groups East(AHJX, JSNJ): West(SCYA, SCGY): Southeast(FJ): Southwest(GZGD, GXJZS): Central (JXJGS, HNYJ, HNWG, SNJ): Northwest(GSWX, SXFP) | 0.0029 | 0.0067 | 0.0096 | Among groups: 0.29 |
Note: For two groups, S. s. semitorques includes populations on mainland and S. s. cinereicapillus includes the population in Taiwan.
Figure 2Data plot of the genetic distance (F) vs. geographical distance (Log geographical distance in km) of the Mainland Spizixos semitorques populations, showing the RMA regression line (R2 = 0.0167).
Figure 3Effective population size and gene flow among populations estimated by LAMARC.
Sampling information for Collared Finchbill.
| Subspecies | Localities | Latitude | Longitude | Sample size | Haplotype numbers | Nucleotide diversity (π) | Haplotype diversity (Hd) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSWX | 32°56′37.74″ | 104°41′0.16″ | 9 | 0.00236 | 1.000 | ||
| SXFP | 33°11′24.0″ | 108°12′0.0″ | 25 | 0.00231 | 0.980 | ||
| SCGY | 32°25′44.51″ | 105°54′4.61″ | 5 | 7/8/9/10/12 | 0.00243 | 1.000 | |
| SCYA | 29°35′24.0″ | 102°35′24.0″ | 10 | 0.00252 | 0.978 | ||
| SNJ | 31°24′35.6″ | 110°33′18.5″ | 11 | 2/3/4/ | 0.00236 | 0.964 | |
| HNYJ | 28°55′53.0″ | 112°17′39.7″ | 10 | 22/ | 0.00240 | 0.978 | |
| HNWG | 26°25′48.0″ | 110°22′12.0″ | 3 | 0.00187 | 1.000 | ||
| GZGD | 26°35′4.96″ | 107°14′3.46″ | 10 | 74 0.00245 | 1.000 | ||
| GXJZS | 24°39′59.36″ | 104°52′17.8″ | 2 | 0.00187 | 1.000 | ||
| JXJGS | 26°32′38.44″ | 114°8′50.45″ | 12 | 0.00195 | 0.985 | ||
| JSNJ | 32°1′48.00″ | 118°27′36.0″ | 4 | 53/54/ | 0.00210 | 1.000 | |
| AHJX | 30°4′15.12″ | 118°35′44.45″ | 9 | 0.00132 | 0.786 | ||
| FJ | 27°19′54.86″ | 118°7′13.85″ | 5 | 0.00205 | 1.000 | ||
| TAIPEI | 24°54′56.56″ | 121°40′26.17″ | 5 | 85/86/87/88/89 | 0.00196 | 1.000 |
Note: Haplotype numbers are also used in network analysis and underlines denote shared haplotype.
Figure 4Sampling sites of S. s. semitorques: GSWX SXNS SCGY SCYA SNJ GZGD HNYJ JSNJ AHJX GXJZS JXJGS HNWG FJ; S. s. cinereicapillus: TAIPEI. Circles’ size is proportional to amount of each sampling site.