OBJECTIVES: Blood pressure variability (BPV) and its reduction in response to antihypertensive treatment are predictors of clinical outcomes; however, little is known about its heritability. In this study, we examined the relative influence of genetic and environmental sources of variance of BPV and the extent to which it may depend on race or sex in young twins. METHODS: Twins were enrolled from two studies. One study included 703 white twins (308 pairs and 87 singletons) aged 18-34 years, whereas another study included 242 white twins (108 pairs and 26 singletons) and 188 black twins (79 pairs and 30 singletons) aged 12-30 years. BPV was calculated from 24-h ambulatory blood pressure recording. RESULTS: Twin modeling showed similar results in the separate analysis in both twin studies and in the meta-analysis. Familial aggregation was identified for SBP variability (SBPV) and DBP variability (DBPV) with genetic factors and common environmental factors together accounting for 18-40% and 23-31% of the total variance of SBPV and DBPV, respectively. Unique environmental factors were the largest contributor explaining up to 82-77% of the total variance of SBPV and DBPV. No sex or race difference in BPV variance components was observed. The results remained the same after adjustment for 24-h blood pressure levels. CONCLUSIONS: The variance in BPV is predominantly determined by unique environment in youth and young adults, although familial aggregation due to additive genetic and/or common environment influences was also identified explaining about 25% of the variance in BPV.
OBJECTIVES: Blood pressure variability (BPV) and its reduction in response to antihypertensive treatment are predictors of clinical outcomes; however, little is known about its heritability. In this study, we examined the relative influence of genetic and environmental sources of variance of BPV and the extent to which it may depend on race or sex in young twins. METHODS: Twins were enrolled from two studies. One study included 703 white twins (308 pairs and 87 singletons) aged 18-34 years, whereas another study included 242 white twins (108 pairs and 26 singletons) and 188 black twins (79 pairs and 30 singletons) aged 12-30 years. BPV was calculated from 24-h ambulatory blood pressure recording. RESULTS: Twin modeling showed similar results in the separate analysis in both twin studies and in the meta-analysis. Familial aggregation was identified for SBP variability (SBPV) and DBP variability (DBPV) with genetic factors and common environmental factors together accounting for 18-40% and 23-31% of the total variance of SBPV and DBPV, respectively. Unique environmental factors were the largest contributor explaining up to 82-77% of the total variance of SBPV and DBPV. No sex or race difference in BPV variance components was observed. The results remained the same after adjustment for 24-h blood pressure levels. CONCLUSIONS: The variance in BPV is predominantly determined by unique environment in youth and young adults, although familial aggregation due to additive genetic and/or common environment influences was also identified explaining about 25% of the variance in BPV.
Authors: Steven Boker; Michael Neale; Hermine Maes; Michael Wilde; Michael Spiegel; Timothy Brick; Jeffrey Spies; Ryne Estabrook; Sarah Kenny; Timothy Bates; Paras Mehta; John Fox Journal: Psychometrika Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Xiaojing Xu; Shaoyong Su; Frank A Treiber; Robert Vlietinck; Robert Fagard; Catherine Derom; Marij Gielen; Ruth J F Loos; Harold Snieder; Xiaoling Wang Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Chike C Nwabuo; Yuichiro Yano; Henrique T Moreira; Duke Appiah; Henrique D Vasconcellos; Queen N Aghaji; Anthony Viera; Jamal S Rana; Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy; Norrina B Allen; Pamela J Schreiner; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; João A C Lima Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Marina Sirota; Gonneke Willemsen; Purnima Sundar; Steven J Pitts; Shobha Potluri; Edi Prifti; Sean Kennedy; S Dusko Ehrlich; Jacoline Neuteboom; Cornelis Kluft; Karen E Malone; David R Cox; Eco J C de Geus; Dorret I Boomsma Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joyce M Evans; Siqi Wang; Christopher Greb; Vladimir Kostas; Charles F Knapp; Qingguang Zhang; Eric S Roemmele; Michael B Stenger; David C Randall Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 4.566