Literature DB >> 21745333

Alveolar bone regeneration around immediate implants using an injectable nHAC/CSH loaded with autogenic blood-acquired mesenchymal progenitor cells: an experimental study in the dog mandible.

Xue Han1, Hongchen Liu, Dongsheng Wang, Fang Su, Yong Zhang, Wei Zhou, Shujun Li, Rui Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lack of osseointegration between a dental implant and the walls of the alveolar bone is a common problem in immediate implantation. Injectable tissue-engineered bone (ITB) may be an effective and minimally invasive solution to the problem. In this study, an injectable bone cement, nHAC/CSH, which consists of nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen (nHAC) and calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO4 .½H2 O; CSH) was investigated as a tissue-engineered scaffold material with blood-acquired mesenchymal progenitor cells (BMPC) as seeding cells.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the new bone formation around immediate dental implants using nHAC/CSH loaded with dog blood-acquired mesenchymal progenitor cells (dBMPC) in a canine model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: dBMPC were first isolated from peripheral blood of healthy adult dogs. Alizarin red and oil red O staining were then used to evaluate the potential of dBMPC to differentiate into bi-lineage mesenchymal tissues in vitro. Four healthy mongrel dogs were used in this study. The alveolar bone defects around immediate implants of dogs were created. Each defect was randomly assigned to one of the following three groups: (1) the ITB group (dBMPC+nHAC/CSH); (2) injectable bone cement nHAC/CSH; or (3) no materials (controls). Methylene blue staining was used to examine the bone formation after 3 months.
RESULTS: Studies in vitro revealed that dBMPC could be induced to osteoblasts and adipocytes. The ITB group (dBMPC+nHAC/CSH) showed significantly more bone-implant contact and bone density than either nHAC/CSH or control groups in the areas with peri-implant defects 3 months after implantation.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the ITB composed of nHAC/CSH and dBMPC may represent a useful strategy for the clinical reconstruction of bone defects around immediate implantation. However, further investigation is needed involving the use of human BMPC as well as possible use of stem cells.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21745333     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00373.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  9 in total

1.  Ectopic osteogenesis of an injectable nHAC/CSH loaded with blood-acquired mesenchymal progenitor cells in a nude mice model.

Authors:  Xue Han; Xia Wu; Hongchen Liu; Dongsheng Wang; Lingling E; Wei Zhou
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Titanium-enriched hydroxyapatite-gelatin scaffolds with osteogenically differentiated progenitor cell aggregates for calvaria bone regeneration.

Authors:  João R Ferreira; Ricardo Padilla; Ganokon Urkasemsin; Kun Yoon; Kelly Goeckner; Wei-Shou Hu; Ching-Chang Ko
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  The combination of nano-calcium sulfate/platelet rich plasma gel scaffold with BMP2 gene-modified mesenchymal stem cells promotes bone regeneration in rat critical-sized calvarial defects.

Authors:  Zunpeng Liu; Xue Yuan; Gabriela Fernandes; Rosemary Dziak; Ciprian N Ionita; Chunyi Li; Changdong Wang; Shuying Yang
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 6.832

4.  Effect of GARP on osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via the regulation of TGFβ1 in vitro.

Authors:  Ruixue Li; Jian Sun; Fei Yang; Yang Sun; Xingwen Wu; Qianrong Zhou; Youcheng Yu; Wei Bi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  Nanotechnology Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Goker Funda; Silvio Taschieri; Giannì Aldo Bruno; Emma Grecchi; Savadori Paolo; Donati Girolamo; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 6.  Synthetic Injectable Biomaterials for Alveolar Bone Regeneration in Animal and Human Studies.

Authors:  Matej Tomas; Marija Čandrlić; Martina Juzbašić; Zrinka Ivanišević; Nikola Matijević; Aleksandar Včev; Olga Cvijanović Peloza; Marko Matijević; Željka Perić Kačarević
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  Efficacy of stem cells on the healing of peri-implant defects: systematic review of preclinical studies.

Authors:  Mônica Yuri Orita Misawa; Guy Huynh-Ba; Gustavo Machado Villar; Cristina Cunha Villar
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2016-02-04

8.  New Application of Osteogenic Differentiation from HiPS Stem Cells for Evaluating the Osteogenic Potential of Nanomaterials in Dentistry.

Authors:  Giulia Tetè; Paolo Capparè; Enrico Gherlone
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Biomaterials for bone regeneration: an orthopedic and dentistry overview.

Authors:  J Girón; E Kerstner; T Medeiros; L Oliveira; G M Machado; C F Malfatti; P Pranke
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.590

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.