Literature DB >> 21745012

Copy-number changes in prenatal diagnosis.

Melissa Strassberg1, Gary Fruhman, Ignatia B Van den Veyver.   

Abstract

Until recently, the prenatal detection of genetic disease was available to only a subset of the pregnant population deemed to be at an increased risk for chromosomal abnormalities or, more rarely, other genetic disorders, based on family history, multiple-marker screening or ultrasound findings. Guided by recent data that indicate that screening for Down syndrome has improved and that risks of invasive procedures are smaller than previously ascertained, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has recommended that all women have access to invasive prenatal diagnosis. The parallel development of newer genetic diagnostic technologies, such as chromosomal microarray analysis, has made it feasible to simultaneously test for more conditions than was possible with standard karyotype analysis complemented by targeted fluorescence in situ hybridization or mutation detection for specific conditions. In the pediatric and adult population, chromosomal microarray analysis has already been thoroughly evaluated and is now recommended as a first-line diagnostic test for clinically suspected genetic disorders. In this article, we review the current status of array-based comparative genomic hybridization use for prenatal diagnosis and predict that, in the future, it will replace karyotyping as a first-line test for detecting chromosomal abnormalities in the prenatal setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21745012     DOI: 10.1586/erm.11.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1473-7159            Impact factor:   5.225


  3 in total

1.  Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy; Grier P Page; George R Saade; Robert M Silver; Vanessa R Thorsten; Corette B Parker; Halit Pinar; Marian Willinger; Barbara J Stoll; Josefine Heim-Hall; Michael W Varner; Robert L Goldenberg; Radek Bukowski; Ronald J Wapner; Carolyn D Drews-Botsch; Barbara M O'Brien; Donald J Dudley; Brynn Levy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-line test in pregnancies with a priori low risk for the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorentino; Stefania Napoletano; Fiorina Caiazzo; Mariateresa Sessa; Sara Bono; Letizia Spizzichino; Anthony Gordon; Andrea Nuccitelli; Giuseppe Rizzo; Marina Baldi
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Optimizing the Diagnostic Strategy to Identify Genetic Abnormalities in Miscarriage.

Authors:  Myungshin Kim; In Yang Park; Jong-Mi Lee; So Young Shin; Guk Won Kim; Woo Jeng Kim; Jeong Ha Wie; Subeen Hong; Dain Kang; Hayoung Choi; Jisook Yim; Yonggoo Kim
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.074

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.