OBJECTIVE: To analyze the mechanism of overjet correction and space closure when treating Class II Division 1 patients by extracting the maxillary first molars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 prospective, consecutively treated Class II Division 1 patients (45 female, 55 male; 10.5-17.2 years old). Standardized lateral cephalograms prior to and after treatment were evaluated via a modified sagittal occlusion analysis (SO analysis). RESULTS: The mean degree of overjet correction was 5.2 mm (95% CI = 4.8-5.6 mm) and was on average achieved by means of 1.7 mm skeletal and 3.5 mm dental changes. The relationship between the premolars improved by 4.8 mm toward a Class I relationship, facilitated by 1.7 mm skeletal and 3.1 mm dental changes. The 11.3 mm space closure in the maxillary first-molar extraction area resulted from distalization of the second premolars (1.4 mm) and a mesialization of the second molars (9.9 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Overjet correction was essentially achieved by a retrusion of the upper incisors, as well as by ventral growth of the lower jaw and protrusion of the lower incisors. Space closure was only partly achieved by distalization of the premolars.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the mechanism of overjet correction and space closure when treating Class II Division 1 patients by extracting the maxillary first molars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 prospective, consecutively treated Class II Division 1 patients (45 female, 55 male; 10.5-17.2 years old). Standardized lateral cephalograms prior to and after treatment were evaluated via a modified sagittal occlusion analysis (SO analysis). RESULTS: The mean degree of overjet correction was 5.2 mm (95% CI = 4.8-5.6 mm) and was on average achieved by means of 1.7 mm skeletal and 3.5 mm dental changes. The relationship between the premolars improved by 4.8 mm toward a Class I relationship, facilitated by 1.7 mm skeletal and 3.1 mm dental changes. The 11.3 mm space closure in the maxillary first-molar extraction area resulted from distalization of the second premolars (1.4 mm) and a mesialization of the second molars (9.9 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Overjet correction was essentially achieved by a retrusion of the upper incisors, as well as by ventral growth of the lower jaw and protrusion of the lower incisors. Space closure was only partly achieved by distalization of the premolars.
Authors: Mattijs J P Stalpers; Johan W Booij; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Christos Katsaros Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Kevin O'Brien; Jean Wright; Frances Conboy; YeWeng Sanjie; Nicky Mandall; Stephen Chadwick; Ivan Connolly; Paul Cook; David Birnie; Mark Hammond; Nigel Harradine; David Lewis; Cathy McDade; Laura Mitchell; Alison Murray; Julian O'Neill; Mike Read; Stephen Robinson; Dai Roberts-Harry; Jonathan Sandler; Ian Shaw Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Johan Willem Booij; Marco Serafin; Rosamaria Fastuca; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Alberto Caprioglio Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 4.964