Literature DB >> 21743012

Chronic implantation of newly developed suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation prosthesis in dogs.

Takeshi Morimoto1, Motohiro Kamei, Kentaro Nishida, Hirokazu Sakaguchi, Hiroyuki Kanda, Yasushi Ikuno, Haruhiko Kishima, Tomoyuki Maruo, Kunihiko Konoma, Motoki Ozawa, Kohji Nishida, Takashi Fujikado.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of implanting a newly developed suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation (STS) prosthesis in dogs and to determine its biocompatibility and stability over a 3-month period.
METHODS: The STS prosthesis system consisted of an array of 49 electrodes (nine were active), an intravitreal return electrode, and an extraocular microstimulator. The 49-electrode array was implanted into a scleral pocket of each of three healthy beagle dogs. Color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, electroretinography, and functional testing of the STS system were performed postoperatively. The dogs were euthanatized 3 months after the implantation, and the retinas were evaluated histologically.
RESULTS: All the prostheses were successfully implanted without complications, and no serious complications occurred during the 3-month postoperative period. The fixation of the implant was stable throughout the experimental period. Fluorescein angiography showed that the entire retina, including the area on the electrode array, remained well perfused without intraocular inflammation. Electroretinograms recorded from the eyes with the prosthesis did not differ significantly from those recorded from control eyes. Functional testing of the STS system showed that this system performed well for the 3-month experimental period. Histologic evaluations showed good preservation of the retina over the electrode array.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of a newly developed STS retinal prosthesis into a scleral pocket of beagle dogs is surgically feasible and can be performed without significant damage to the retina or the animal. The biocompatibility and stability of the system were good for the 3-month observation period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21743012     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  12 in total

1.  Surgical feasibility and biocompatibility of wide-field dual-array suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation prosthesis in middle-sized animals.

Authors:  Tibor Karl Lohmann; Hiroyuki Kanda; Takeshi Morimoto; Takao Endo; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Kentaro Nishida; Motohiro Kamei; Peter Walter; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Retinal implants: emergence of a multidisciplinary field.

Authors:  Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.710

3.  Implantation of a newly developed direct optic nerve electrode device for artificial vision in rabbits.

Authors:  Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Motohiro Kamei; Kentaro Nishida; Yasuo Terasawa; Takashi Fujikado; Motoki Ozawa; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Spatial characteristics of evoked potentials elicited by a MEMS microelectrode array for suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation in a rabbit.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Xiaohong Sui; Wenjia Liu; Yiliang Lu; Pengjia Cao; Zengguang Ma; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Electronic approaches to restoration of sight.

Authors:  G A Goetz; D V Palanker
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2016-08-09

6.  Inner retinal preservation in rat models of retinal degeneration implanted with subretinal photovoltaic arrays.

Authors:  Jacob G Light; James W Fransen; Adewumi N Adekunle; Alice Adkins; Gobinda Pangeni; James Loudin; Keith Mathieson; Daniel V Palanker; Maureen A McCall; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Chronic electrical stimulation with a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: a preclinical safety and efficacy study.

Authors:  David A X Nayagam; Richard A Williams; Penelope J Allen; Mohit N Shivdasani; Chi D Luu; Cesar M Salinas-LaRosa; Sue Finch; Lauren N Ayton; Alexia L Saunders; Michelle McPhedran; Ceara McGowan; Joel Villalobos; James B Fallon; Andrew K Wise; Jonathan Yeoh; Jin Xu; Helen Feng; Rodney Millard; Melanie McWade; Patrick C Thien; Chris E Williams; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Implantation of multiple suprachoroidal electrode arrays in rabbits.

Authors:  Walid Abdallah; Wen Li; James Weiland; Mark Humayun; Hossein Ameri
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-09

Review 9.  Glaucomatous optic neuropathy treatment options: the promise of novel therapeutics, techniques and tools to help preserve vision.

Authors:  Najam A Sharif
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  Techniques for processing eyes implanted with a retinal prosthesis for localized histopathological analysis.

Authors:  David A X Nayagam; Ceara McGowan; Joel Villalobos; Richard A Williams; Cesar Salinas-LaRosa; Penny McKelvie; Irene Lo; Meri Basa; Justin Tan; Chris E Williams
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.