Literature DB >> 21742104

Polymorphisms associated with in vitro aspirin resistance are not associated with clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease who report regular aspirin use.

Deepak Voora1, John Horton, Svati H Shah, Linda K Shaw, L Kristin Newby.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with heightened in vitro platelet function during aspirin exposure (which we define as "laboratory aspirin resistance") would be associated with greater risk for death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke among patients with coronary artery disease regularly using aspirin.
METHODS: Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease patients with (n = 3,449, CATHeterization GENetics cohort) or without (n = 11,754, nongenetic cohort) banked DNA with ≥1 coronary stenosis >75% were followed up at 6 months, then annually for death, MI, or stroke occurring during periods of reported aspirin use. We evaluated associations of candidate SNPs from GNB3, PEAR1, ITGB3, VAV3, ITGA2, GPVI, PTGS1, F2R, THBS1, A2AR, and GP1BA with events during follow-up using Cox proportional hazards modeling adjusted for clinical characteristics associated with outcomes in the nongenetic cohort.
RESULTS: Over a median of 3.5 years, 2,762 (24%) nongenetic cohort patients and 648 (19%) CATHeterization GENetics cohort patients had the composite outcome during reported aspirin use. No candidate SNPs were significantly associated with death, MI, or stroke in either univariable or multivariable analyses. A prospective analysis demonstrated 80% to 88% power to detect a hazard ratio of ≥1.3 for minor allele carriers.
CONCLUSION: Patients with angiographically significant coronary artery disease regularly using aspirin and carrying SNPs associated with laboratory aspirin resistance were not at higher risk for death, MI, or stroke. Using these SNPs to guide more aggressive antiplatelet therapy is not justified by these results. Direct extrapolation from in vitro findings to the clinical setting should be avoided.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21742104     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  14 in total

Review 1.  The pharmacogenetic control of antiplatelet response: candidate genes and CYP2C19.

Authors:  Yao Yang; Joshua P Lewis; Jean-Sébastien Hulot; Stuart A Scott
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 2.  Dual antiplatelet therapy in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Negar Asdaghi; Jose G Romano
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  G-Protein β3-Subunit Gene C825T Polymorphism and Cardiovascular Risk: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Andrea Semplicini; Tommaso Grandi; Chiara Sandonà; Arianna Cattelan; Giulio Ceolotto
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2015-04-23

4.  G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 gene polymorphisms are associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients receiving β-blockers.

Authors:  Mihai V Podgoreanu; Joseph P Mathew; Miklos D Kertai; Yen-Wei Li; Yi-Ju Li; Svati H Shah; William E Kraus; Manuel L Fontes; Mark Stafford-Smith; Mark F Newman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2014-07-21

5.  Pharmacogenomics Informs Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Mariana Babayeva; Brigitte Azzi; Zvi G Loewy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Targeted deep sequencing of the PEAR1 locus for platelet aggregation in European and African American families.

Authors:  Ali R Keramati; Lisa R Yanek; Kruthika Iyer; Margaret A Taub; Ingo Ruczinski; Diane M Becker; Lewis C Becker; Nauder Faraday; Rasika A Mathias
Journal:  Platelets       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.862

7.  Genome-wide association study of acute kidney injury after coronary bypass graft surgery identifies susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Mark Stafford-Smith; Yi-Ju Li; Joseph P Mathew; Yen-Wei Li; Yunqi Ji; Barbara G Phillips-Bute; Carmelo A Milano; Mark F Newman; William E Kraus; Miklos D Kertai; Svati H Shah; Mihai V Podgoreanu
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 8.  Personalized antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy: applications and significance of pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Amber L Beitelshees; Deepak Voora; Joshua P Lewis
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2015-02-09

9.  PEAR1 is not a major susceptibility gene for cardiovascular disease in a Flemish population.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Yang; Thibault Petit; Nicholas Cauwenberghs; Zhen-Yu Zhang; Chang-Sheng Sheng; Lutgarde Thijs; Erika Salvi; Benedetta Izzi; Christophe Vandenbriele; Fang-Fei Wei; Yu-Mei Gu; Lotte Jacobs; Lorena Citterio; Simona Delli Carpini; Cristina Barlassina; Daniele Cusi; Marc F Hoylaerts; Peter Verhamme; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.103

10.  Prospective Evaluation of Genetic Variation in Platelet Endothelial Aggregation Receptor 1 Reveals Aspirin-Dependent Effects on Platelet Aggregation Pathways.

Authors:  J D Backman; L M Yerges-Armstrong; R B Horenstein; S Newcomer; S Shaub; M Morrisey; P Donnelly; M Drolet; K Tanner; M A Pavlovich; J R O'Connell; B D Mitchell; J P Lewis
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.