Literature DB >> 21741793

Technical and clinical success after endovascular therapy for chronic type B aortic dissections.

Alexander Oberhuber1, Philipp Winkle, Hubert Schelzig, Karl-Heinz Orend, Bernd Manfred Muehling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze early technical success and late clinical success after endovascular entry sealing for chronic type B dissection with special emphasis on reintervention, false lumen thrombosis, and aortic remodeling.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database. From September 1999 to January 2011, 19 patients with chronic type B dissections were treated by endovascular entry sealing. Median age was 60 years. Median time between onset of acute dissection and surgical intervention was 36 (1 to 60) months. Median follow-up was 13 months (1 to 124).
RESULTS: The endografts used were: Medtronic Captivia (5), Medtronic Valiant (5), Gore TAG (6), Gore C-TAG (2), and Cook Zenith (1). In four patients, revascularization of the left subclavian artery was performed prior to entry sealing. Primary technical success rate (entry sealing, absence of type I leak) was 18/19 (94.7%). In-hospital mortality was 0%. Spinal cord injury with persistent paraplegia occurred in 1/19 (5.2%) patients. After a maximal follow-up of 124 months, reinterventions in 9/19 (47.3%) were necessary: distal/proximal extension of stent graft (8), replacement of the aortic arch due to retrograde dissection (1), and open infrarenal aneurysm repair (1). During follow-up, none of the patients died due to stent-related complications.
CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment (EVT) in chronic type B dissections has a high technical success rate and low mortality/morbidity. However reintervention rates are not negligible which might reduce the clinical success of EVT. Future investigations should aim at identifying patients who benefit from EVT at better defining the timing of EVT and at determining if entry sealing alone is sufficient.
Copyright © 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21741793     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  5 in total

1.  Best surgical option for arch extension of type B dissection: the endovascular approach.

Authors:  Toru Kuratani
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-05

2.  Thoracic endovascular repair of chronic type B aortic dissection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael L Williams; Madeleine de Boer; Bridget Hwang; Bruce Wilson; John Brookes; Nicholas McNamara; David H Tian; Timothy Shiraev; Ourania Preventza
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-01

3.  Changes in inflammatory response after endovascular treatment for type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Bernice L Y Cheuk; Y C Chan; Stephen W K Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yanqing Chen; Simeng Zhang; Lei Liu; Qingsheng Lu; Tianyi Zhang; Zaiping Jing
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Contemporary Management Strategies for Chronic Type B Aortic Dissections: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Arnoud V Kamman; Hector W L de Beaufort; Guido H W van Bogerijen; Foeke J H Nauta; Robin H Heijmen; Frans L Moll; Joost A van Herwaarden; Santi Trimarchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.