Literature DB >> 21741482

Reliability of ERP and single-trial analyses.

Carl M Gaspar1, Guillaume A Rousselet, Cyril R Pernet.   

Abstract

A reliable measure is one we can trust in the long run. Thus, the reliability of measurements is as important as their validity. Here we investigated the reliability of brain electrical visual evoked responses to faces and noise textures. For the first time, we provide reliability measures for the full time course of event-related potentials (ERPs). Our analyses were also performed on a R(2)(t) metric that reflects results from single-trial analyses, therefore providing the first reliability analysis of ERP single-trial analyses. Results show that ERPs and R(2)(t) are highly reliable (cross-correlation ~0.9, lag ~4/6ms, intra-class correlation ~0.9) but also idiosyncratic: ERPs and R(2)(t) are highly reproducible within subjects, who differ reliably from each other and the grand average across subjects. Consequently, grand averages, although highly reliable, can be misleading because they might not reflect the actual brain dynamic of any subjects.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21741482     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  19 in total

1.  Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Chia-Lin Lee; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Anticipatory alpha oscillation predicts attentional selection and hemodynamic response.

Authors:  Chenguang Zhao; Jialiang Guo; Dongwei Li; Ye Tao; Yulong Ding; Hanli Liu; Yan Song
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Strategic down-regulation of attentional resources as a mechanism of proactive response inhibition.

Authors:  Zachary D Langford; Ruth M Krebs; Durk Talsma; Marty G Woldorff; C N Boehler
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Using trial-level data and multilevel modeling to investigate within-task change in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Hannah I Volpert-Esmond; Edgar C Merkle; Meredith P Levsen; Tiffany A Ito; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Brain-behavioral adaptability predicts response to cognitive behavioral therapy for emotional disorders: A person-centered event-related potential study.

Authors:  Jonathan P Stange; Annmarie MacNamara; Amy E Kennedy; Greg Hajcak; K Luan Phan; Heide Klumpp
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Using multilevel models for the analysis of event-related potentials.

Authors:  Hannah I Volpert-Esmond; Elizabeth Page-Gould; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Single-trial analyses: why bother?

Authors:  Cyril R Pernet; Paul Sajda; Guillaume A Rousselet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-08

8.  Low-level contrast statistics are diagnostic of invariance of natural textures.

Authors:  Iris I A Groen; Sennay Ghebreab; Victor A F Lamme; H Steven Scholte
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Nonlinear Effects of Linearly Increasing Perceptual Load on ERPs to Emotional Pictures.

Authors:  Sebastian Schindler; Laura Gutewort; Maximilian Bruchmann; Robert Moeck; Thomas Straube
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-07-29

10.  Spatially pooled contrast responses predict neural and perceptual similarity of naturalistic image categories.

Authors:  Iris I A Groen; Sennay Ghebreab; Victor A F Lamme; H Steven Scholte
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.