Literature DB >> 21741328

Probing for DNA damage with β-hairpins: similarities in incision efficiencies of bulky DNA adducts by prokaryotic and human nucleotide excision repair systems in vitro.

Yang Liu1, Dara Reeves, Konstantin Kropachev, Yuqin Cai, Shuang Ding, Marina Kolbanovskiy, Alexander Kolbanovskiy, Judith L Bolton, Suse Broyde, Bennett Van Houten, Nicholas E Geacintov.   

Abstract

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is an important prokaryotic and eukaryotic defense mechanism that removes a large variety of structurally distinct lesions in cellular DNA. While the proteins involved are completely different, the mode of action of these two repair systems is similar, involving a cut-and-patch mechanism in which an oligonucleotide sequence containing the lesion is excised. The prokaryotic and eukaryotic NER damage-recognition factors have common structural features of β-hairpin intrusion between the two DNA strands at the site of the lesion. In the present study, we explored the hypothesis that this common β-hairpin intrusion motif is mirrored in parallel NER incision efficiencies in the two systems. We have utilized human HeLa cell extracts and the prokaryotic UvrABC proteins to determine their relative NER incision efficiencies. We report here comparisons of relative NER efficiencies with a set of stereoisomeric DNA lesions derived from metabolites of benzo[a]pyrene and equine estrogens in different sequence contexts, utilizing 21 samples. We found a general qualitative trend toward similar relative NER incision efficiencies for ∼65% of these substrates; the other cases deviate mostly by ∼30% or less from a perfect correlation, although several more distant outliers are also evident. This resemblance is consistent with the hypothesis that lesion recognition through β-hairpin insertion, a common feature of the two systems, is facilitated by local thermodynamic destabilization induced by the lesions in both cases. In the case of the UvrABC system, varying the nature of the UvrC endonuclease, while maintaining the same UvrA/B proteins, can markedly affect the relative incision efficiencies. These observations suggest that, in addition to recognition involving the initial modified duplexes, downstream events involving UvrC can also play a role in distinguishing and processing different lesions in prokaryotic NER.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21741328      PMCID: PMC3212938          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  71 in total

1.  The comings and goings of nucleotide excision repair factors on damaged DNA.

Authors:  Thilo Riedl; Fumio Hanaoka; Jean-Marc Egly
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Ordered conformational changes in damaged DNA induced by nucleotide excision repair factors.

Authors:  Angels Tapias; Jerome Auriol; Diane Forget; Jacqueline H Enzlin; Orlando D Schärer; Frederic Coin; Benoit Coulombe; Jean-Marc Egly
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-02-23       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Damage repertoire of the Escherichia coli UvrABC nuclease complex includes abasic sites, base-damage analogues, and lesions containing adjacent 5' or 3' nicks.

Authors:  A Snowden; Y W Kow; B Van Houten
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1990-08-07       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  UvrABC nuclease complex repairs thymine glycol, an oxidative DNA base damage.

Authors:  Y W Kow; S S Wallace; B Van Houten
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 5.  Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  B Van Houten
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-03

Review 6.  Mechanism of action of the Escherichia coli UvrABC nuclease: clues to the damage recognition problem.

Authors:  B Van Houten; A Snowden
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Sequence-dependence of the energetics of opening of at basepairs in DNA.

Authors:  Congju Chen; Irina M Russu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Solution conformation of the (+)-cis-anti-[BP]dG adduct in a DNA duplex: intercalation of the covalently attached benzo[a]pyrenyl ring into the helix and displacement of the modified deoxyguanosine.

Authors:  M Cosman; C de los Santos; R Fiala; B E Hingerty; V Ibanez; E Luna; R Harvey; N E Geacintov; S Broyde; D J Patel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1993-04-27       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Solution conformation of the major adduct between the carcinogen (+)-anti-benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide and DNA.

Authors:  M Cosman; C de los Santos; R Fiala; B E Hingerty; S B Singh; V Ibanez; L A Margulis; D Live; N E Geacintov; S Broyde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Effects of DNA adduct structure and sequence context on strand opening of repair intermediates and incision by UvrABC nuclease.

Authors:  Yue Zou; Steven M Shell; Christopher D Utzat; Charlie Luo; Zhengguan Yang; Nicholas E Geacintov; Ashis K Basu
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Nucleotide excision repair in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Orlando D Schärer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  The ATPase mechanism of UvrA2 reveals the distinct roles of proximal and distal ATPase sites in nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  Brandon C Case; Silas Hartley; Memie Osuga; David Jeruzalmi; Manju M Hingorani
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Conservation and Divergence in Nucleotide Excision Repair Lesion Recognition.

Authors:  Nicolas Wirth; Jonas Gross; Heide M Roth; Claudia N Buechner; Caroline Kisker; Ingrid Tessmer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Nucleotide excision repair efficiencies of bulky carcinogen-DNA adducts are governed by a balance between stabilizing and destabilizing interactions.

Authors:  Yuqin Cai; Nicholas E Geacintov; Suse Broyde
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C protein (XPC) serves as a general sensor of damaged DNA.

Authors:  Steven M Shell; Edward K Hawkins; Miaw-Sheue Tsai; Aye Su Hlaing; Carmelo J Rizzo; Walter J Chazin
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-09-17

6.  The relationships between XPC binding to conformationally diverse DNA adducts and their excision by the human NER system: is there a correlation?

Authors:  Yuan-Cho Lee; Yuqin Cai; Hong Mu; Suse Broyde; Shantu Amin; Xuejing Chen; Jung-Hyun Min; Nicholas E Geacintov
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-29

7.  A tale of two cities: A tribute to Aziz Sancar's Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his molecular characterization of NER.

Authors:  Bennett Van Houten
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-01

Review 8.  Prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  Caroline Kisker; Jochen Kuper; Bennett Van Houten
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  Repair efficiency of (5'S)-8,5'-cyclo-2'-deoxyguanosine and (5'S)-8,5'-cyclo-2'-deoxyadenosine depends on the complementary base.

Authors:  Paritosh Pande; Rajat S Das; Clayton Sheppard; Yoke W Kow; Ashis K Basu
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-10-10

10.  Ribonucleotides as nucleotide excision repair substrates.

Authors:  Yuqin Cai; Nicholas E Geacintov; Suse Broyde
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.