Literature DB >> 21740175

Maternal perspectives: qualitative responses about perceived barriers to care among children with orofacial clefts in North Carolina.

Cynthia H Cassell1, Dara D Mendez, Ronald P Strauss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine maternal perceptions of barriers to care of children with orofacial clefts (OFC) in a population-based survey that solicited open-ended qualitative responses. DESIGN AND
SETTING: In 2006, a combination mail/phone survey was sent to all mothers of children with OFC. The questionnaire included 76 items. A final open-ended question was included for additional information about cleft-related care. The analysis included responses to the open-ended question and sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents. Qualitative responses were transcribed and entered into a qualitative software package for analysis, and common themes were elucidated. PARTICIPANTS/PATIENTS: The North Carolina Birth Defects Monitoring Program was used to identify all resident infants born with OFC from 2001 to 2004. Of 478 eligible mothers, 52.9% (n  =  248) responded to the survey, and 39.5% (n  =  98) responded to the final open-ended question. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage reporting problems accessing care, frequency of positive and negative comments, and indicators of financial, personal, and structural barriers to care.
RESULTS: Of the 98 respondents, the majority (n  =  95, 96.99%) were the biological mother. Almost 40% of mothers indicated that accessing primary craniofacial care was a problem. Of those citing perceived barriers to care, the major issues cited were financial, structural, and personal barriers.
CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative efforts between craniofacial centers and teams, health care systems, and birth defects registries are warranted to reduce perceived barriers to care among families of children with OFC. Further exploration of the themes and factors associated with barriers to care and services is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21740175     DOI: 10.1597/09-235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  8 in total

1.  Modeling travel impedance to medical care for children with birth defects using Geographic Information Systems.

Authors:  Eric M Delmelle; Cynthia H Cassell; Coline Dony; Elizabeth Radcliff; Jean Paul Tanner; Csaba Siffel; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2013-09-02

2.  Parental Perceptions of Family Centered Care in Medical Homes of Children with Neurodevelopmental Disabilities.

Authors:  Michaela L Zajicek-Farber; Gaetano R Lotrecchiano; Toby M Long; Jon Matthew Farber
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-08

3.  What we don't know can hurt us: Nonresponse bias assessment in birth defects research.

Authors:  Paula D Strassle; Cynthia H Cassell; Stuart K Shapira; Sarah C Tinker; Robert E Meyer; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-07-14

Review 4.  State-Mandated Coverage of Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate Treatment.

Authors:  Tanya Wanchek; George Wehby
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-03-16

5.  Academic outcomes of children with isolated orofacial clefts compared with children without a major birth defect.

Authors:  Jessica Knight; Cynthia H Cassell; Robert E Meyer; Ronald P Strauss
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2014-05-30

6.  Barriers to care for children with orofacial clefts in North Carolina.

Authors:  Cynthia H Cassell; Paula Strassle; Dara D Mendez; Kyung A Lee; Anne Krohmer; Robert E Meyer; Ronald P Strauss
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2014-09-08

7.  Factors associated with distance and time traveled to cleft and craniofacial care.

Authors:  Cynthia H Cassell; Anne Krohmer; Dara D Mendez; Kyung A Lee; Ronald P Strauss; Robert E Meyer
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2013-09-02

8.  Insights from parents about caring for a child with birth defects.

Authors:  Jodi Lemacks; Kristin Fowles; Amanda Mateus; Kayte Thomas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.