| Literature DB >> 21738793 |
Yuan Zhang1, Xiaoping Lin, Martin Desrosiers, Wei Zhang, Na Meng, Liping Zhao, Demin Han, Luo Zhang.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-4 (IRAK-4) encodes a kinase that is essential for NF-kB activation in Toll-like receptor and T-cell receptor signaling pathways, indicating a possible crosstalk between innate and acquired immunities. We attempted to determine whether the polymorphisms in the Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-4 (IRAK-4) gene are associated with allergic rhinitis (AR) in the Han Chinese population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21738793 PMCID: PMC3128076 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic characteristics of the study population.
| Characteristic | AR cases (n = 379) | Controls (n = 333) |
| Age Mean (Range) (years) | 26.9±14.8 (2–71) | 36.3±15.3 (3–78) |
| Sex, M/F, No. (%) | 227 (59.9)/152 (40.1) | 179 (53.8)/154 (46.2) |
| Total IgE, kU/l | 283.1±512.7 | 68.3±119.2 |
| Perennial/seasonal, No.(%) | 280 (73.9)/99(26.1) | - |
| Allergen category, No. (%) | ||
|
| 216 (57.0) | - |
|
| 64 (16.9) | - |
|
| 99 (26.1) | - |
-: no results.
Figure 1Linkage Dysequilibrium (LD) plot for IRAK-4.
The LD plots were generated by Haploview 4.1. The upper part of the graph illustrates the HapMap info track including the location of the gene on the chromosome. The white horizontal bar below the info track illustrates the location of SNPs on a physical scale. The value within each diamond represents the pairwise correlation between tagging SNPs defined by the upper left and the upper right sides of the diamond. Shading represents the magnitude and significance of pairwise LD, with a red-to-white gradient reflecting higher to lower LD values.
Allele and genotype frequencies and AR susceptibility.
| SNP | Minor allele | Case, Control Frequencies | Allele | OR(95%CI) | Genotype | ORHet (95%CI) | ORHom (95%CI) |
| rs1870765 | C | 0.0179, 0.0231 | 0.4924 | 1.2997 (0.6137–2.7525) | 0.7861 | 0.7651(0.3584–1.6333) | - |
| s4251431 | T | 0.0666, 0.1019 | 0.0216 | 1.5917 (1.0678–2.3726) | 0.0805 | 0.6300(0.4034–0.9840) | 0.5445 (0.1290–2.2976) |
| rs4251569 | T | 0.1556, 0.1528 | 0.8831 | 0.9782 (0.7295–1.3118) | 0.7573 | 0.9602(0.6870–1.3419) | 1.5730 (0.4562–5.4235) |
| rs1461567 | T | 0.5124, 0.4623 | 0.0649 | 1.2226 (0.9876–1.5134) | 0.144 | 1.0997(0.8134–1.4869) | 1.2448 (0.8671–1.7868) |
| rs3794262 | T | 0.1171, 0.1729 | 0.0033 | 1.5764 (1.1620–2.1386) | 0.0115 | 0.6195(0.4369–0.8785) | 0.5464 (0.1769–1.6876) |
| rs4251481 | G | 0.0442, 0.0746 | 0.019 | 1.7427 (1.0903–2.7854) | 0.049 | 0.5841(0.3585–0.9518) | - |
| rs4251513 | G | 0.3705, 0.3638 | 0.7959 | 0.9714(0.7796–1.2104) | 0.8605 | 1.0870(0.8050–1.4679) | 0.9685 (0.6214–1.5095) |
| rs4251540 | T | 0.0732, 0.0950 | 0.1458 | 1.3292 (0.9050–1.9524) | 0.359 | 0.7545(0.4932–1.1542) | 0.6623 (0.1471–2.9816) |
| rs4251559 | G | 0.5627, 0.5017 | 0.023 | 0.7719(0.6175–0.9650) | 0.044 | 1.1810(0.8610–1.6200) | 1.2309(0.8731–1.7353) |
| rs6582484 | C | 0.0809, 0.4983 | 0.0264 | 1.5076(1.0474–2.1700) | 0.0688 | 0.6186(0.4058–0.9431) | 0.7891(0.2623–2.3734 |
ORHet :odds ratios for heterozygotes ORHom : odds ratios for homozygotes.
-: show no case of homzygotes.
Figure 2Significance of each tagging SNP.
The x axis shows the genomic position, and the y axis shows the negative base-2 logarithm of the P values for each allele and genotype of each SNP. Lines are drawn between points only for the sake of clarity, as the disease association between markers is not linear.
Male and female cohort homogeneity test and allele model association analysis.
| SNP | Breslow-Day Test | Males | Females | ||
|
|
| OR (95%CI) |
| OR (95%CI) | |
| rs1870765 | 0.908 | 0.6547 | 1.1123 (0.6785–1.8230) | 0.5919 | 1.1876 (0.6050–2.3313) |
| rs4251431 | 0.068 | 0.0030 | 1.5196 (1.0982–2.1028) | 0.9312 | 1.0140 (0.7379–1.3935) |
| rs4251569 | 0.866 | 0.7734 | 0.9742 (0.8169–1.1617) | 0.9682 | 0.9956 (0.8018–1.2362) |
| rs1461567 | 0.259 | 0.5180 | 0.9595 (0.8465–1.0876) | 0.0390 | 1.1868 (1.0082–1.3969) |
| rs3794262 | 0.602 | 0.0073 | 1.2981 (1.0513–1.6028) | 0.1354 | 1.2195 (0.9233–1.6108) |
| rs4251481 | 0.187 | 0.3107 | 1.1504 (0.8587–1.5411) | 0.0124 | 1.7957 (1.0295–3.1321) |
| rs4251513 | 0.082 | 0.1667 | 0.9130 (0.8040–1.0367) | 0.2716 | 1.1003 (0.9259–1.3076) |
| rs4251540 | 0.057 | 0.0170 | 1.3495 (1.0206–1.7845) | 0.5862 | 0.9194 (0.6870–1.2305) |
| rs4251559 | 0.462 | 0.2392 | 1.0828 (0.9477–1.2372) | 0.0443 | 1.1978 (1.0032–1.4301) |
| rs6582484 | 0.044 | 0.0024 | 1.4692 (1.1011–1.9604) | 0.9253 | 0.9832 (0.7393–1.3157) |
Allele and genotype frequencies and house dust mites AR susceptibility.
| SNP | Minor allele | Case, Control Frequencies | Allele | OR(95%CI) | Genotype | ORHet(95%CI) | ORHom(95%CI) |
| rs1870765 | C | 0.0195, 0.0231 | 0.6928 | 1.1908(0.5003–2.8341) | 0.9233 | 0.8365(0.3482–2.0098) | - |
| rs4251431 | T | 0.0741, 0.1019 | 0.1386 | 1.4189(0.8914–2.2586) | 0.3181 | 0.7705(0.4632–1.2814) | 0.3234(0.0375–2.7896) |
| rs4251569 | T | 0.1585, 0.1528 | 0.8009 | 0.9571(0.6808–1.3456) | 0.5648 | 0.9388(0.6340–1.3903) | 2.0000 (0.5307–7.5366) |
| rs1461567 | T | 0.5417, 0.4623 | 0.0123 | 1.3748(1.0713–1.7643) | 0.0289 | 1.1493 (0.8079–1.6351) | 1.4094 (0.9342–2.1262) |
| rs3794262 | T | 0.1073, 0.1729 | 0.0034 | 1.7388(1.1966–2.5267) | 0.0124 | 0.5767 (0.3788–0.8781) | 0.3855(0.0810–1.8335) |
| rs4251481 | G | 0.0294, 0.0746 | 0.0023 | 2.6593(1.3865–5.1007) | 0.0087 | 0.3765 (0.1930–0.7346) | - |
| rs4251513 | G | 0.3537, 0.3638 | 0.7385 | 1.0450(0.8072–1.3529) | 0.7541 | 1.0907 (0.7681–1.5486) | 0.8229 (0.4797–1.4116) |
| rs4251540 | T | 0.0780, 0.0950 | 0.3445 | 1.2402(0.7932–1.9392) | 0.5655 | 0.8668 (0.5328–1.4102) | 0.3885 (0.0431–3.5004) |
| rs4251559 | G | 0.5870, 0.4983 | 0.0075 | 1.4307(1.1001–1.8605) | 0.0203 | 1.1867 (0.8202–1.7170) | 1.3687 (0.9217–2.0325) |
| rs6582484 | C | 0.0821, 0.1172 | 0.0731 | 1.4851(0.9617–2.2933) | 0.1996 | 0.6532 (0.3969–1.0751) | 0.6987 (0.1785–2.7341) |
Association between IRAK-4 SNPs and IgE levels.
| SNP |
| F |
|
| rs1870765 | 0.512 | 0.053 | 0.818 |
| rs4251431 | 0.236 | 0.862 | 0.423 |
| rs4251569 | 0.216 | 0.745 | 0.475 |
| rs1461567 | 0.025 | 0.543 | 0.762 |
| rs3794262 | 0.164 | 0.909 | 0.404 |
| rs4251481 | 0.396 | 0.278 | 0.598 |
| rs4251513 | 0.002 | 1.784 | 0.41 |
| rs4251540 | 0.268 | 0.86 | 0.424 |
| rs4251559 | 0.014 | 0.737 | 0.692 |
| rs6582484 | 0.257 | 0.596 | 0.551 |
*: results using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA.
Haplotype frequencies and AR susceptibility.
| Haplotype | Case Frequencies | Control Frequencies | df | Chi Square |
|
|
| 0.510 | 0.462 | 1 | 3.036 | 0.0814 |
|
| 0.171 | 0.178 | 1 | 0.116 | 0.7329 |
|
| 0.152 | 0.153 | 1 | 0.008 | 0.9297 |
|
| 0.073 | 0.097 | 1 | 2.473 | 0.1159 |
|
| 0.044 | 0.069 | 1 | 3.899 | 0.0483 |
|
| 0.043 | 0.034 | 1 | 0.688 | 0.4069 |
df: degree of freedom.