| Literature DB >> 21738402 |
Abstract
PURPOSE: In Uygur populations, exfoliation syndrome (XFS) and exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) occurred at a high frequency. In this study, we evaluate the association profiles of the lysyl oxidase-like 1 (LOXL1) gene polymorphisms with XFS in the Uygur population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21738402 PMCID: PMC3130722
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
Primer sequences for PCR for SNPs of LOXL1.
| F: 5′-ATTCGGCTTTGGCCAGGT-3′ | 178 | |
| | R: 5′-GAACTGCTGCGGGTAGGA-3′ | |
| F: 5′-CTCTAGGGCCCCTTGGAGAAT-3′ | 321 | |
| R: 5′-GGCCAGAGGTCTGCTAAGCAC-3′ |
Two sets of primers were used for PCR for the three SNPs. The asterisk indicates that the same set of primers was used for rs1048661 and rs3825942.
Figure 1Representative chromatograms displaying and the PCR electrophoresis image for the SNP rs1048661. A, B, C: The three different genotypes of the SNP rs1048661. D: The PCR electrophoresis image for the SNP rs1048661.
Figure 2Representative chromatograms displaying and the PCR electrophoresis image for the SNP rs2165241. A, B, C: The three different genotypes of the SNP rs2165241. D: The PCR electrophoresis image for the SNP rs2165241.
Figure 3Representative chromatograms displaying and the PCR electrophoresis image for the SNP rs3825942. A, B, C: The three different genotypes of the SNP rs3825942. D: The PCR electrophoresis image for the SNP rs3825942
Clinical features of the patients with XFS/XFG.
| Age at recruitment (mean±SD) | 67.00±7.16 | 67.75±10.01 | 71.15±9.53 |
| Range | 58–76 | 60–81 | 52–95 |
| Gender (male/female) | 5/2 | 3/1 | 33/20 |
| History of trabeculectomy | n=1 | n=0 | n=0 |
| History of laser trabeculoplasty | n=0 | n=0 | n=0 |
| History of laser iridotomy | n=1 | n=0 | n=0 |
| Treated with medicine | n=2 | n=0 | n=0 |
A total of 64 patients with exfoliation syndrome were recruited into this study, including 7 cases with XFG and 53 cases with XFS without glaucoma. Only one of the 7 XFG patients had trabeculectomy and laser iridotomy and 2 patients were treated with medicine.
Allele and genotype association analysis for the three SNPs of LOXL1.
| G | 104 (0.81) | 176 (0.69) | 6.22 | 0.013 | 1.92 (1.14–3.22) |
| T | 24 (0.19) | 78 (0.31) | |||
| GG | 42 (0.66) | 60 (0.47) | 5.78 | 0.016 | 2.13 (1.14–3.97) |
| GT | 20 (0.31) | 56 (0.44) | | | |
| TT | 2 (0.03) | 11 (0.09) | 2.06 | 0.152 | 0.34 (0.07–1.58) |
| Total | 64 | 127 | 6.37 | 0.041 | NA |
| T | 72 (0.56) | 62 (0.24) | 37.89 | 0.000 | 3.98 (2.54–6.25) |
| C | 56 (0.44) | 192 (0.76) | |||
| TT | 22 (0.34) | 10 (0.08) | 21.43 | 0.000 | 6.13 (2.68–14.01) |
| CT | 28 (0.44) | 42 (0.33) | | | |
| CC | 14 (0.22) | 75 (0.59) | 23.64 | 0.000 | 0.19 (0.10–0.39) |
| Total | 64 | 127 | 31.79 | 0.000 | NA |
| G | 122 (0.95) | 205 (0.81) | 14.73 | 0.000 | 4.86 (2.02–11.68) |
| A | 6 (0.05) | 49 (0.19) | |||
| GG | 58 (0.91) | 80 (0.63) | 16.21 | 0.000 | 5.68 (2.28–14.17) |
| GA | 6 (0.09) | 45 (0.35) | | | |
| AA | 0 (0.00) | 2 (0.02) | 1.02 | 0.313 | NA |
| Total | 64 | 127 | 16.33 | 0.000 | NA |
There were significant differences for the allelic proportion between the patient and control groups for all three SNPs. G allele of rs1048661, G of rs3825942, and T of rs2165241 were risk alleles for the disorder. The genotypes GG for rs1048661, GG for rs3825942, and TT for rs2165241 were risk genotypes for the disease. Total indicates the general test of association in the 2-by-3 table of disease-by-genotype. NA: not available. The asterisks indicates the OR values and p values derived from comparison of the specific genotype with all the others, i.e., GG versus GT+TT at rs1048661, TT versus CT+CT at rs2165241.
Haplotype Association analysis between the LOXL1 SNPs and XFS/XFG.
| | | | | | | ||
| T | G | | 0.047 | 0.181 | 6.52 | 0.011 | 0.22 (0.06–0.77) |
| G | G | | 0.922 | 0.756 | 7.66 | 0.006 | 3.81(1.40–10.34) |
| G | A | | 0.031 | 0.063 | 0.86 | 0.353 | 0.48 (0.10–2.33) |
| Total | | | | | 7.90 | 0.019 | NA |
| | | | | | | ||
| T | C | | 0.031 | 0.157 | 6.65 | 0.010 | 0.17 (0.04–0.76) |
| G | T | | 0.563 | 0.260 | 16.89 | 0.000 | 3.66 (1.99–6.90) |
| T | T | | 0.016 | 0.024 | 0.13 | 0.716 | 0.66 (0.07–6.44) |
| G | C | | 0.391 | 0.559 | 4.83 | 0.028 | 0.51 (0.27–0.93) |
| Total | | | | | 19.21 | 0.000 | NA |
| | | | | | | ||
| G | C | | 0.406 | 0.660 | 11.35 | 0.001 | 0.35 (0.19–0.65) |
| A | T | | 0.016 | 0.008 | 0.25 | 0.619 | 2.00(0.12–32.51) |
| G | T | | 0.563 | 0.280 | 15.00 | 0.000 | 3.38 (1.80–6.34) |
| A | C | | 0.016 | 0.055 | 1.65 | 0.198 | 0.27 (0.03–2.26) |
| Total | | | | | 16.06 | 0.001 | NA |
| | | | | | |||
| T | G | C | 0.031 | 0.157 | 6.65 | 0.010 | 0.17 (0.04–0.76) |
| G | G | C | 0.375 | 0.504 | 2.85 | 0.092 | 0.59 (0.32–1.09) |
| G | G | T | 0.547 | 0.252 | 16.25 | 0.000 | 3.58 (1.90–6.76) |
| T | G | T | 0.016 | 0.024 | 0.13 | 0.716 | 0.66 (0.07–6.44) |
| G | A | C | 0.016 | 0.055 | 1.65 | 0.198 | 0.27 (0.03–2.26) |
| G | A | T | 0.016 | 0.008 | 0.25 | 0.619 | 2.00(0.12–32.51) |
| Total | 19.93 | 0.001 | NA | ||||
The haplotypes G-G for the SNPs rs1048661 and rs3825942, G-T for the SNPs rs1048661 and rs2165241, and G-T for the SNPs rs3825942 and rs2165241 were identified to be significantly associated with XFS/G. The haplotype G-G-T for the three SNPs was identified to be significantly associated with XFS/G. Total indicates omnibus tests, while the others indicate the haplotype-specific tests. The OR values were obtained from comparison of each individual haplotype with all the other haplotypes, i.e., T-G versus G-G + G-A for the SNPs rs1048661 and rs3825942, etc. NA: not available.
Allele and genotype association analysis between the LOXL1 SNPs and different gender of XFS/XFG.
| Male | XFS/XFG | 41 | 1 (0.02) | 14 (0.34) | 26 (0.63) | 4.08 | 0.130 | 66 (0.80) | 16 (0.20) | 3.92 | 0.048 | 1.90 (1.00–3.59) |
| | Control | 81 | 10 (0.12) | 31 (0.38) | 40 (0.49) | | | 111 (0.69) | 51 (0.31) | | | |
| Female | XFS/XFG | 23 | 1 (0.04) | 6 (0.26) | 16 (0.70) | 4.98 | 0.083 | 38 (0.83) | 8 (0.17) | 2.32 | 0.128 | 1.97 (0.82–4.78) |
| | Control | 46 | 1 (0.02) | 25 (0.54) | 20 (0.43) | | | 65 (0.71) | 27 (0.29) | | | |
| Male | XFS/XFG | 41 | 12 (0.29) | 19 (0.46) | 10 (0.24) | 9.45 | 0.009 | 39 (0.48) | 43 (0.52) | 10.8 | 0.001 | 2.51 (1.44–4.39) |
| | Control | 81 | 46 (0.57) | 27 (0.33) | 8 (0.10) | | | 43 (0.27) | 119 (0.73) | | | |
| Female | XFS/XFG | 23 | 2 (0.09) | 9 (0.39) | 12 (0.52) | 27.6 | 0.000 | 33 (0.72) | 13 (0.28) | 34.1 | 0.000 | 9.75 (4.31–22.07) |
| | Control | 46 | 29 (0.63) | 15 (0.33) | 2 (0.04) | | | 19 (0.21) | 73 (0.79) | | | |
| Male | XFS/XFG | 41 | 36 (0.88) | 5 (0.12) | 0 (0.00) | 8.41 | 0.015 | 77 (0.94) | 5 (0.06) | 7.89 | 0.005 | 3.79 (1.42–10.14) |
| | Control | 81 | 51 (0.63) | 28 (0.35) | 2 (0.02) | | | 130 (0.80) | 32 (0.20) | | | |
| Female | XFS/XFG | 23 | 22 (0.96) | 1 (0.04) | 0 (0.00) | 8.46 | 0.004 | 45 (0.98) | 1 (0.02) | 7.19 | 0.007 | 10.2 (1.31–79.26) |
| Control | 46 | 29 (0.63) | 17 (0.37) | 0 (0.00) | 75 (0.82) | 17 (0.18) | ||||||
There were significant differences in allelic and genotypic proportion between the genders in the patient and control groups for the SNPs rs2165241 and rs3825942. T allele of rs2165241 and G of rs3825942 were risk alleles for the disorder for both the male and female groups. Total indicates the general test of association in the 2-by-3 table of disease-by-genotype.
Allele and genotype association analysis between the LOXL1 SNPs and different aged XFS/XFG.
| ≤65 | XFS/XFG | 20 | 0 (0.00) | 4 (0.20) | 16 (0.80) | 7.32 | 0.026 | 36 (0.90) | 4 (0.10) | 6.48 | 0.011 | 3.86 (1.29–11.58) |
| | Control | 65 | 4 (0.06) | 31(0.48) | 30 (0.46) | | | 91 (0.70) | 39 (0.30) | | | |
| >65 | XFS/XFG | 44 | 2 (0.05) | 16(0.36) | 26 (0.59) | 2.04 | 0.360 | 68 (0.77) | 20 (0.23) | 1.95 | 0.163 | 1.56 (0.83–2.92) |
| | Control | 62 | 7 (0.11) | 25 (0.40) | 30 (0.48) | | | 85 (0.69) | 39 (0.31) | | | |
| ≤65 | XFS/XFG | 20 | 2 (0.10) | 12 (0.60) | 6 (0.30) | 16.3 | 0.000 | 24 (0.60) | 16 (0.40) | 16.5 | 0.000 | 4.41 (2.09–9.30) |
| | Control | 65 | 40 (0.62) | 17 (0.26) | 8 (0.12) | | | 33 (0.25) | 97 (0.75) | | | |
| >65 | XFS/XFG | 44 | 12 (0.27) | 16 (0.36) | 16 (0.36) | 21.7 | 0.000 | 48 (0.55) | 40 (0.45) | 21.6 | 0.000 | 3.93 (2.18–7.10) |
| | Control | 62 | 35 (0.56) | 25 (0.40) | 2 (0.03) | | | 29 (0.23) | 95 (0.77) | | | |
| ≤65 | XFS/XFG | 20 | 17 (0.85) | 3 (0.15) | 0 (0.00) | 1.61 | 0.204 | 37 (0.93) | 3 (0.07) | 1.38 | 0.241 | 2.11 (0.59–7.54) |
| | Control | 65 | 46 (0.71) | 19 (0.29) | 0 (0.00) | | | 111 (0.85) | 19 (0.15) | | | |
| >65 | XFS/XFG | 44 | 41 (0.93) | 3 (0.07) | 0 (0.00) | 18.4 | 0.000 | 85 (0.97) | 3 (0.03) | 16.9 | 0.000 | 9.04 (2.66–30.71) |
| Control | 62 | 34 (0.55) | 26 (0.42) | 2 (0.03) | 94 (0.76) | 30 (0.24) | ||||||
There were significant differences of the allelic and genotypic proportion in different aged patient and control groups for all three SNPs. G allele of rs1048661 was a risk allele for the disorder in the below 65-year-old group. T of rs2165241 was a risk allele for the disorder in both aged groups. G of rs3825942 was a risk allele for the disorder in the over 65-year-old group. The genotypes also showed significant differences in the below 65-year-old group of rs1048661, both aged groups of rs2165241, and over 65-year-old group of rs3825942. Total indicates the general test of association in the 2-by-3 table of disease-by-genotype.
Risk alleles and MAF for the three SNPs of LOXL1 in different populations.
| Iceland | G | 0.349(T) | G | 0.153 (A) | T | 0.473 (T) | [ |
| Sweden | G | 0.318 (T) | G | 0.121 (A) | T | 0.465 (C) | |
| Austria | G | 0.329 (T) | G | 0.183 (A) | NA | NA | [ |
| United States | G | 0.335 (T) | G | 0.156 (A) | T | 0.487 (T) | [ |
| United States | G | 0.297 (T) | G | 0.202 (A) | T | 0.448 (T) | [ |
| United States | G | 0.400 (T) | G | 0.120 (A) | NA | NA | [ |
| United States | G | 0.281 (T) | G | 0.205 (A) | T | 0.456 (T) | [ |
| Germany and Italy | G | 0.348 (T) | G | 0.149 (A) | T | 0.488 (T) | [ |
| Australia | G | NA | G | NA | NA | NA | [ |
| refSNP (European) | NA | 0.040 (T) | NA | 0.172 (T) | NA | 0.392 (T) | NCBI Database |
| India | * | 0.270 (T) | G | 0.070 (A) | NA | NA | [ |
| Japan | T | 0.450 (G) | G | 0.147 (A) | NA | NA | [ |
| Japan | T | 0.497 (G) | G | 0.137 (A) | C | 0.102 (T) | [ |
| Japan | T | 0.460 (G) | G | 0.143 (A) | NA | NA | [ |
| Japan | T | NA | G | NA | NA | NA | [ |
| Japan | T | 0.493 (T) | G | 0.123 (A) | NA | NA | [ |
| Japan | T | 0.450 (T) | G | 0.194 (A) | C | 0.124 (T) | [ |
| Singapore (Chinese) | * | 0.444 (G) | G | 0.082 (A) | NA | NA | [ |
| China (Beijing) | T | 0.484 (G) | G | 0.104 (A) | C | 0.100 (T) | [ |
| China (Xinjang Uygur) | G | 0.188 (T) | G | 0.047 (A) | T | 0.244 (T) | present study |
| China | | | | | | | [ |
| (Hong Kong) | NA | 0.470 (G) | NA | 0.124 (A) | NA | 0.102 (T) | |
| (Beijing) | NA | 0.497 (G) | NA | 0.135 (A) | NA | 0.084 (T) | |
| Asian (China) | NA | NA | NA | 0.111 (T) | NA | 0.067 (T) | |
| Asian (Japan) | NA | 0.438 (G) | NA | 0.125 (T) | NA | 0.167 (T) | |
NA indicates not available. The asterisk indicates that no association was found. MAF indicates minor allele frequency.