Literature DB >> 21736814

Digestive physiological outcomes related to polydextrose and soluble maize fibre consumption by healthy adult men.

Brittany M Vester Boler1, Mariana C Rossoni Serao, Laura L Bauer, Michael A Staeger, Thomas W Boileau, Kelly S Swanson, George C Fahey.   

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate digestive physiological outcomes elicited by functional fibres fed to healthy adult men. A total of twenty-one healthy adult men were utilised in a cross-over design. Each subject received polydextrose (PDX) or soluble maize fibre (SCF) (21 g/d) or no supplemental fibre (no fibre control; NFC) in a snack bar. Periods were 21 d and faeces were collected during the last 5 d of each period. Food intake, including fibre intake, did not differ among treatments. Flatulence (P = 0·001) and distention (P = 0·07) were greatest when subjects consumed PDX or SCF. Reflux was greater (P = 0·04) when subjects consumed SCF compared with NFC. All tolerance scores were low ( < 2·5), indicating only slight discomfort. Faecal ammonia, 4-methylphenol, indole and branched-chain fatty acid concentrations were decreased (P < 0·01) when subjects consumed the functional fibre sources compared with NFC. Faecal acetate, propionate and butyrate concentrations were lower (P < 0·05) when subjects consumed PDX compared with SCF and NFC. Faecal pH was lower (P = 0·01) when subjects consumed SCF compared with NFC, while PDX was intermediate. Faecal wet weight was greatest (P = 0·03) when subjects consumed SCF compared with NFC. Faecal dry weight tended to be greater (P = 0·07) when subjects consumed PDX compared with NFC. The functional fibres led to 1·4 and 0·9 g (PDX and SCF, respectively) increases in faecal dry mass per g supplemental fibre intake. Bifidobacterium spp. concentrations were greater (P < 0·05) when subjects consumed SCF compared with NFC. These functional fibres appear to be beneficial to gut health while leading to minimal gastrointestinal upset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21736814     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114511002388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  21 in total

1.  Re-evaluation of polydextrose (E 1200) as a food additive.

Authors:  Maged Younes; Gabriele Aquilina; Laurence Castle; Karl-Heinz Engel; Paul Fowler; Peter Fürst; Rainer Gürtler; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Trine Husøy; Melania Manco; Wim Mennes; Peter Moldeus; Sabina Passamonti; Romina Shah; Dina Hendrika Waalkens-Berendsen; Detlef Wölfle; Matthew Wright; Polly Boon; Riccardo Crebelli; Alessandro Di Domenico; Metka Filipič; Alicja Mortensen; Ruud Woutersen; Henk Van Loveren; Alessandra Giarola; Federica Lodi; Ana Maria Rincon; Alexandra Tard; Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-01-08

Review 2.  Fermented Fiber Supplements Are No Better Than Placebo for a Laxative Effect.

Authors:  Johnson W McRorie; William D Chey
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet Supplemented with Resistant Starch Display Marked Shifts in the Liver Metabolome Concurrent with Altered Gut Bacteria.

Authors:  Dorothy A Kieffer; Brian D Piccolo; Maria L Marco; Eun Bae Kim; Michael L Goodson; Michael J Keenan; Tamara N Dunn; Knud Erik Bach Knudsen; Roy J Martin; Sean H Adams
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 4.  Effects of Dietary Fibers on Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Gut Microbiota Composition in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valentina Vinelli; Paola Biscotti; Daniela Martini; Cristian Del Bo'; Mirko Marino; Tomás Meroño; Olga Nikoloudaki; Francesco Maria Calabrese; Silvia Turroni; Valentina Taverniti; Andrea Unión Caballero; Cristina Andrés-Lacueva; Marisa Porrini; Marco Gobbetti; Maria De Angelis; Patrizia Brigidi; Mariona Pinart; Katharina Nimptsch; Simone Guglielmetti; Patrizia Riso
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 5.  The interplay between fiber and the intestinal microbiome in the inflammatory response.

Authors:  Shiu-Ming Kuo
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 6.  Towards microbial fermentation metabolites as markers for health benefits of prebiotics.

Authors:  Kristin A Verbeke; Alan R Boobis; Alessandro Chiodini; Christine A Edwards; Anne Franck; Michiel Kleerebezem; Arjen Nauta; Jeroen Raes; Eric A F van Tol; Kieran M Tuohy
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.800

7.  Effect of the novel polysaccharide PolyGlycopleX® on short-chain fatty acid production in a computer-controlled in vitro model of the human large intestine.

Authors:  Raylene A Reimer; Annet J H Maathuis; Koen Venema; Michael R Lyon; Roland J Gahler; Simon Wood
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Tolerability and Safety of a Novel Ketogenic Ester, Bis-Hexanoyl (R)-1,3-Butanediol: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Oliver Chen; Traci M Blonquist; Eunice Mah; Kristen Sanoshy; Dawn Beckman; Kristin M Nieman; Barbara L Winters; Joshua C Anthony; Eric Verdin; John C Newman; Brianna J Stubbs
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Soluble fiber dextrin and soluble corn fiber supplementation modify indices of health in cecum and colon of Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Brenda K Knapp; Laura L Bauer; Kelly S Swanson; Kelly A Tappenden; George C Fahey; Maria R C de Godoy
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Alternative dietary fiber sources in companion animal nutrition.

Authors:  Maria R C de Godoy; Katherine R Kerr; George C Fahey
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.