Literature DB >> 21735380

Exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Tracey E Howe1, Beverley Shea, Lesley J Dawson, Fiona Downie, Ann Murray, Craig Ross, Robin T Harbour, Lynn M Caldwell, Gisela Creed.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a condition resulting in an increased risk of skeletal fractures due to a reduction in the density of bone tissue. Treatment of osteoporosis typically involves the use of pharmacological agents. In general it is thought that disuse (prolonged periods of inactivity) and unloading of the skeleton promotes reduced bone mass, whereas mechanical loading through exercise increases bone mass.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of exercise interventions in preventing bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women. SEARCH STRATEGY: During the update of this review we updated the original search strategy by searching up to December 2010 the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group's Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2010 Issue 12); MEDLINE; EMBASE; HealthSTAR; Sports Discus; CINAHL; PEDro; Web of Science; Controlled Clinical Trials; and AMED. We attempted to identify other studies by contacting experts, searching reference lists and searching trial registers. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that met our predetermined inclusion criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Pairs of members of the review team extracted the data and assessed trial quality using predetermined forms. For dichotomous outcomes (fractures), we calculated risk ratios (RRs) using a fixed-effect model. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MDs) of the percentage change from baseline. Where heterogeneity existed (determined by the I(2) statistic), we used a random-effects model. MAIN
RESULTS: Forty-three RCTs (27 new in this update) with 4320 participants met the inclusion criteria. The most effective type of exercise intervention on bone mineral density (BMD) for the neck of femur appears to be non-weight bearing high force exercise such as progressive resistance strength training for the lower limbs (MD 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24 to 1.82). The most effective intervention for BMD at the spine was combination exercise programmes (MD 3.22; 95% CI 1.80 to 4.64) compared with control groups. Fractures and falls were reported as adverse events in some studies. There was no effect on numbers of fractures (odds ratio (OR) 0.61; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.64). Overall, the quality of the reporting of studies in the meta-analyses was low, in particular in the areas of sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding and loss to follow-up. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a relatively small statistically significant, but possibly important, effect of exercise on bone density compared with control groups. Exercise has the potential to be a safe and effective way to avert bone loss in postmenopausal women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21735380     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000333.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  178 in total

Review 1.  Inflammatory bone loss: pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Kurt Redlich; Josef S Smolen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Sarcopenia and its relationship with bone mineral density in middle-aged and elderly European men.

Authors:  S Verschueren; E Gielen; T W O'Neill; S R Pye; J E Adams; K A Ward; F C Wu; P Szulc; M Laurent; F Claessens; D Vanderschueren; S Boonen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Effects of Lemon Beverage Containing Citric Acid with Calcium Supplementation on Bone Metabolism and Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women: Double-Blind 11-Month Intervention Study.

Authors:  Hiromi Ikeda; Tadayuki Iida; Masanori Hiramitsu; Takashi Inoue; Satomi Aoi; Miho Kanazashi; Fumiko Ishizaki; Toshihide Harada
Journal:  J Nutr Metab       Date:  2021-02-24

Review 4.  Exercise for improving bone health in women treated for stages I-III breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Canan P Fornusek; Sharon L Kilbreath
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Exercise to improve functional outcomes in persons with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Varahra; I B Rodrigues; J C MacDermid; D Bryant; T Birmingham
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Too Fit To Fracture: exercise recommendations for individuals with osteoporosis or osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  L M Giangregorio; A Papaioannou; N J Macintyre; M C Ashe; A Heinonen; K Shipp; J Wark; S McGill; H Keller; R Jain; J Laprade; A M Cheung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Serum urate levels and the risk of hip fractures: data from the Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  Tapan Mehta; Petra Bůžková; Mark J Sarnak; Michel Chonchol; Jane A Cauley; Erin Wallace; Howard A Fink; John Robbins; Diana Jalal
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 8.694

8.  Exercise effects on hip bone mineral density in older, post-menopausal breast cancer survivors are age dependent.

Authors:  Kerri M Winters-Stone; Michael C Leo; Anna Schwartz
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 9.  Optimising the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ziad Farrah; Ali Sm Jawad
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.659

10.  Association between energy availability and physical activity in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew A Schrager; Jennifer A Schrack; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.