Kerri M Winters-Stone1, Michael C Leo, Anna Schwartz. 1. School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, 3455 SW US Veteran's Hospital Rd, Mailcode: SN-ORD, Portland, OR 97239, USA. wintersk@ohsu.edu
Abstract
UNLABELLED: We evaluated whether age moderated the effect of impact + resistance exercise on hip BMD in older post-menopausal breast cancer survivors (BCS). Exercise was more beneficial among younger than older women within our sample, suggesting that much older BCS may require different training programs to improve hip health. PURPOSE: Previously, we reported that a program of resistance + impact training stopped bone loss at the spine in older, post-menopausal BCS but had no effect on bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip. Aging may blunt the responsiveness of the hip to mechanical loading, so we conducted a secondary data analysis to evaluate whether age moderated the effect of exercise on hip BMD. METHODS: We analyzed data from our randomized, controlled trial in older (≥ 50 years of age at diagnosis), post-menopausal, post-adjuvant treatment BCS (n = 106) comparing women assigned toimpact + resistance exercise (POWIR) or to a control program of low-intensity stretching (FLEX). We examined effect modification by age on BMD at three hip sites (greater trochanter, femoral neck, and total hip) using hierarchical linear modeling adjusting for time since diagnosis and use of adjuvant hormone therapy. RESULTS: Age moderated the effect of exercise on total hip BMD such that younger women in POWIR were more likely to see a positive net benefit than FLEX compared to older women where there was little difference between groups (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The skeletal response to loading at the hip within post-menopausal BCS diminishes with age. Whether more vigorous exercise programs and/or longer training periods are required to favorably change hip health in older BCS will require future study and careful thought about the risks and benefits of tougher training programs.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: We evaluated whether age moderated the effect of impact + resistance exercise on hip BMD in older post-menopausal breast cancer survivors (BCS). Exercise was more beneficial among younger than older women within our sample, suggesting that much older BCS may require different training programs to improve hip health. PURPOSE: Previously, we reported that a program of resistance + impact training stopped bone loss at the spine in older, post-menopausal BCS but had no effect on bone mineral density (BMD) at the hip. Aging may blunt the responsiveness of the hip to mechanical loading, so we conducted a secondary data analysis to evaluate whether age moderated the effect of exercise on hip BMD. METHODS: We analyzed data from our randomized, controlled trial in older (≥ 50 years of age at diagnosis), post-menopausal, post-adjuvant treatment BCS (n = 106) comparing women assigned to impact + resistance exercise (POWIR) or to a control program of low-intensity stretching (FLEX). We examined effect modification by age on BMD at three hip sites (greater trochanter, femoral neck, and total hip) using hierarchical linear modeling adjusting for time since diagnosis and use of adjuvant hormone therapy. RESULTS: Age moderated the effect of exercise on total hip BMD such that younger women in POWIR were more likely to see a positive net benefit than FLEX compared to older women where there was little difference between groups (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The skeletal response to loading at the hip within post-menopausal BCS diminishes with age. Whether more vigorous exercise programs and/or longer training periods are required to favorably change hip health in older BCS will require future study and careful thought about the risks and benefits of tougher training programs.
Authors: T Saarto; H Sievänen; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; R Nikander; L Vehmanen; R Huovinen; H Kautiainen; S Järvenpää; H M Penttinen; M Utriainen; A S Jääskeläinen; A Elme; J Ruohola; T Palva; H Vertio; M Rautalahti; M Fogelholm; R Luoto; C Blomqvist Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2011-09-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Fred Saad; Jonathan D Adachi; Jacques P Brown; Leah A Canning; Karen A Gelmon; Robert G Josse; Kathleen I Pritchard Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Z Chen; M Maricic; A K Aragaki; C Mouton; L Arendell; A M Lopez; T Bassford; R T Chlebowski Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2008-09-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Karen M Mustian; Calvin L Cole; Po Ju Lin; Matt Asare; Chunkit Fung; Michelle C Janelsins; Charles S Kamen; Luke J Peppone; Allison Magnuson Journal: Semin Oncol Nurs Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 2.315
Authors: Kerri M Winters-Stone; Jessica C Dobek; Jill A Bennett; Gianni F Maddalozzo; Christopher W Ryan; Tomasz M Beer Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Cheryl L Rock; Shirley W Flatt; Tim E Byers; Graham A Colditz; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Patricia A Ganz; Kathleen Y Wolin; Anthony Elias; Helen Krontiras; Jingxia Liu; Michael Naughton; Bilgé Pakiz; Barbara A Parker; Rebecca L Sedjo; Holly Wyatt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Danúbia da Cunha Sá-Caputo; Pedro Ronikeili-Costa; Rafaelle Pacheco Carvalho-Lima; Luciana Camargo Bernardo; Milena Oliveira Bravo-Monteiro; Rebeca Costa; Janaina de Moraes-Silva; Dulciane Nunes Paiva; Christiano Bittencourt Machado; Paula Mantilla-Giehl; Adriano Arnobio; Pedro Jesus Marin; Mario Bernardo-Filho Journal: Rehabil Res Pract Date: 2014-09-03
Authors: Martina Ferioli; Giorgio Zauli; Alberto M Martelli; Marco Vitale; James A McCubrey; Simona Ultimo; Silvano Capitani; Luca M Neri Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-02-08
Authors: Michael K Baker; Carolyn J Peddle-McIntyre; Daniel A Galvão; Catherine Hunt; Nigel Spry; Robert U Newton Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 3.279