Literature DB >> 21735297

Lower catheter-related bloodstream infection in arterial than in venous femoral catheter.

L Lorente1, A Jiménez, M M Martín, C Naranjo, I Roca, M L Mora.   

Abstract

In previous studies no differences were found in catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) between arterial and venous catheters. However, the distribution of each venous and arterial site could influence the results as in some studies a higher CRBSI incidence in venous and arterial femoral accesses has been found than in other venous and arterial accesses. Possibly, to eliminate this confounding, it might be more appropriate to compare the CRBSI incidence between arterial and venous catheters in the same site as the femoral access. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the incidence of CRBSI between 618 arterial and 288 venous femoral accesses. We found higher CRBSI incidence in venous than in arterial femoral catheters (8.34 vs 1.92 CRBSI episodes/1,000 catheter-days; P < 0.001). Exact logistic regression analysis showed that venous femoral catheters had a higher risk of CRBSI than arterial femoral catheters (OR = 1.02; 95%CI =1.01-infinite; P < 0.001) controlled by APACHE-II score and duration of the catheter. The novel finding of our study is that the risk of CRBSI was higher in venous than in arterial femoral catheters. Thus, special approaches to prevent CRBSI might play a more important role in venous than in arterial catheters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21735297     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-011-1335-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  10 in total

1.  Prospective study of arterial and central venous catheter colonization and of arterial- and central venous catheter-related bacteremia in intensive care units.

Authors:  Ousmane Traoré; Jérôme Liotier; Bertrand Souweine
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Infectious risk associated with arterial catheters compared with central venous catheters.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Lucet; Lila Bouadma; Jean-Ralph Zahar; Carole Schwebel; Arnaud Geffroy; Sebastian Pease; Marie-Christine Herault; Hakim Haouache; Christophe Adrie; Marie Thuong; Adrien Français; Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J Merrer; B De Jonghe; F Golliot; J Y Lefrant; B Raffy; E Barre; J P Rigaud; D Casciani; B Misset; C Bosquet; H Outin; C Brun-Buisson; G Nitenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-08-08       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection.

Authors:  D G Maki; C E Weise; H W Sarafin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Sepsis associated with central vein catheters in critically ill patients.

Authors:  P Collignon; N Soni; I Pearson; T Sorrell; P Woods
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Risk of infection due to central venous catheters: effect of site of placement and catheter type.

Authors:  A M Goetz; M M Wagener; J M Miller; R R Muder
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Prospective study of peripheral arterial catheter infection and comparison with concurrently sited central venous catheters.

Authors:  David Boon Chai Koh; John R Gowardman; Claire M Rickard; Iain K Robertson; Andrew Brown
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Influence of insertion site on central venous catheter colonization and bloodstream infection rates.

Authors:  John R Gowardman; Iain K Robertson; Scott Parkes; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters.

Authors:  Leonardo Lorente; Christophe Henry; María M Martín; Alejandro Jiménez; María L Mora
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Arterial catheter-related infection of 2,949 catheters.

Authors:  Leonardo Lorente; Ruth Santacreu; María M Martín; Alejandro Jiménez; María L Mora
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.