Literature DB >> 12955247

[The need for 24-h double probe pH monitoring in the diagnosis of laryngo-pharyngeal reflux].

P Jecker1, R Schuon, W J Mann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) can have various causes. Because LPRD differs from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the pH monitoring has to be performed directly next to the entrance of the larynx. This is now possible using a new system called pH-RESPONSE.
METHODS: The ambulatory pH was monitored using the double probe pH-RESPONSE in 20 patients with suspected LPRD. The number of refluxes, the number of long refluxes and the period in which the pH was below 4 were compared at the level of the larynx with the data from the esophageal electrode. The DeMeester score was also determined.
RESULTS: The system was well tolerated by 19/20 patients. In 12 patients a GERD could be proved and ten also had LPRD. Surprisingly, these patients had no typical signs such as heart burn. The number of refluxes measured in the esophagus was a third that of the larynx. The average time of pH below 4 was 30 min.
CONCLUSION: The pH-RESPONSE easily allows ambulatory 24 -h double probe pH monitoring to diagnose LPRD. Because large differences were found between data form the esophagus from the level of the larynx, 24-h double probe pH monitoring should be a standard procedure before starting any therapy for LPRD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12955247     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-002-0801-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  20 in total

1.  24-H pharyngeal pH monitoring in healthy volunteers: a normative study.

Authors:  M Bove; M Ruth; L Cange; I Månsson
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  [Clinical management of reflux laryngitis].

Authors:  G Schade; M Hess
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Symptoms, laryngeal findings, and 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with suspected gastroesophago-pharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  R Ylitalo; P A Lindestad; S Ramel
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Laryngeal pseudosulcus as a predictor of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  C Hickson; C B Simpson; R Falcon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Possible relationship of gastroesophagopharyngeal acid reflux with pathogenesis of chronic sinusitis.

Authors:  S O Ulualp; R J Toohill; R Hoffmann; R Shaker
Journal:  Am J Rhinol       Date:  1999 May-Jun

6.  The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux: when is a pH study indicated?

Authors:  S Bouchard; M Lallier; S Yazbeck; A Bensoussan
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  [Diagnosis and therapy of laryngitis gastrica].

Authors:  J Pahn; A Schlottmann; G Witt; W Wilke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Autonomic dysfunction, vasomotor rhinitis, and extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Todd A Loehrl; Timothy L Smith; Ronald J Darling; Laura Torrico; Thomas E Prieto; Reza Shaker; Robert J Toohill; Safwan S Jaradeh
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS).

Authors:  P C Belafsky; G N Postma; J A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Paroxysmal laryngospasm secondary to gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  C J Loughlin; J A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  8 in total

1.  [Reflux and sinusitis].

Authors:  P Jecker
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Determination of normal values of extraesophageal reflux in 24-h two-channel pH testing].

Authors:  P Jecker; R Schuon; C Morales; M Wohlfeil; S Rassouli; W J Mann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  [Extraesophageal reflux. Overview and discussion of a new method for pH monitoring].

Authors:  M Jungheim; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Repeated dual-probe pH monitoring as a diagnostic tool to control therapy for laryngopharyngeal reflux].

Authors:  O Reichel; F Durst; G Rasp; A Berghaus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Prolonged healing process after endonasal nasal sinus surgery. Gastroesophageal reflux as a cause?].

Authors:  D Kleemann; S Nofz; I Plank; A Schlottmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  [No correlation between reflux of gastric contents and obstructive sleep apnea].

Authors:  P Jecker; S Rassouli; O Selivanova; W Lippold; W J Mann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), extraesophageal reflux (EER) and recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Peter Jecker; Lisa A Orloff; Miriam Wohlfeil; Wolf J Mann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  [Extraesophageal reflux in patients suffering from Zenker's diverticulum].

Authors:  C Morales-Divo; P Jecker; B Lippert; W J Mann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.330

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.