Literature DB >> 21735277

Breast and colorectal cancer survivors' knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment.

Mary Jo Nissen1, Michaela L Tsai, Anne H Blaes, Karen K Swenson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Aspects of a personal cancer history can have implications for future decisions regarding screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Clinicians must sometimes rely on patients' self-report of their medical history. This study assessed knowledge of details of cancer diagnosis and treatment among breast and colorectal cancer survivors.
METHODS: Written surveys were completed by 480 breast cancer survivors and 366 colorectal cancer survivors diagnosed between 1999 and 2008 at a large cancer center in the Minneapolis, MN, area (81% response rate). Responses were compared with cancer registry and medical records.
RESULTS: Forty percent of breast cancer survivors and 65% of colorectal cancer survivors were unable to identify their stage of disease. Seven percent of breast cancer survivors and 21% of colorectal cancer survivors in whom regional nodes were examined did not know whether they had positive nodes. Accuracy of knowledge of estrogen and progesterone status among breast cancer survivors was 58% and 39%, respectively. Of breast cancer survivors treated with doxorubicin, 43% correctly identified it as a drug they had received. Their accuracy of identification of receipt of tamoxifen or specific aromatase inhibitors was >90%. Of colorectal cancer survivors treated with oxaliplatin, 52% correctly identified it as a drug they had received. Accuracy on many items decreased with patient age.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies several gaps in adult cancer survivors' knowledge of details of their diagnosis and treatment that have implications for follow-up care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Provision of written treatment summaries to cancer survivors could help them obtain appropriate patient-centered long-term follow-up care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21735277     DOI: 10.1007/s11764-011-0189-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Surviv        ISSN: 1932-2259            Impact factor:   4.442


  21 in total

1.  Validity of self-reported cancer history: a comparison of health interview data and cancer registry records.

Authors:  M M Desai; M L Bruce; R A Desai; B G Druss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Childhood cancer survivors' knowledge of their diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  J Byrne; S Lewis; L Halamek; R R Connelly; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care.

Authors:  Jennifer L Malin; Katherine L Kahn; John Adams; Lorna Kwan; Marianne Laouri; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Validity of self-reported cancers in a prospective cohort study in comparison with data from state cancer registries.

Authors:  M M Bergmann; E E Calle; C A Mervis; H L Miracle-McMahill; M J Thun; C W Heath
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Completeness of information on adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer in population-based cancer registries.

Authors:  Rosemary D Cress; Alan M Zaslavsky; Dee W West; Robert E Wolf; Martha C Felter; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Validity of self-reported information on cancer: determinants of under- and over-reporting.

Authors:  Jonas Manjer; Juan Merlo; Göran Berglund
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 7.  Can we reduce the incidence of second primary malignancies occurring after radiotherapy? A critical review.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Effect of anastrozole on bone mineral density: 5-year results from the anastrozole, tamoxifen, alone or in combination trial 18233230.

Authors:  Richard Eastell; Judith E Adams; Robert E Coleman; Anthony Howell; Rosemary A Hannon; Jack Cuzick; John R Mackey; Matthias W Beckmann; Glen Clack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Validation of self-reported cancers in the California Teachers Study.

Authors:  Arti Parikh-Patel; Mark Allen; William E Wright
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Childhood cancer survivors' knowledge about their past diagnosis and treatment: Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Leslie L Robison; James G Gurney; Joseph P Neglia; Yutaka Yasui; Robert Hayashi; Melissa Hudson; Mark Greenberg; Ann C Mertens
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-10       Impact factor: 157.335

View more
  20 in total

1.  Working after a metastatic cancer diagnosis: Factors affecting employment in the metastatic setting from ECOG-ACRIN's Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns study.

Authors:  Amye J Tevaarwerk; Ju-Whei Lee; Abigail Terhaar; Mary E Sesto; Mary Lou Smith; Charles S Cleeland; Michael J Fisch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Knowledge and prevention practices before breast cancer diagnosis in a cross-sectional study among survivors: impact on patients' involvement in the decision making process.

Authors:  Emanuela Taioli; Gail R Joseph; Linda Robertson; Stacy Eckstein; Camille Ragin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Validity of self-reported fertility-threatening cancer treatments in female young adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  Samantha C Roberts; Amber Knight; Brian W Whitcomb; Jessica R Gorman; Andrew C Dietz; H Irene Su
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Strategies for Successful Survivorship Care Plan Implementation: Results From a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sarah A Birken; Alecia S Clary; Shampa Bernstein; Jamiyla Bolton; Miriam Tardif-Douglin; Deborah K Mayer; Allison M Deal; Sara R Jacobs
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 5.  Summing it up: an integrative review of studies of cancer survivorship care plans (2006-2013).

Authors:  Deborah K Mayer; Sarah A Birken; Devon K Check; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Psychological distress among adult cancer survivors: importance of survivorship care plan.

Authors:  S Cristina Oancea; Vinay K Cheruvu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Cancer survivors' receipt of treatment summaries and implications for patient-centered communication and quality of care.

Authors:  Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; Neetu Chawla; Ellen I Beckjord; Laura P Forsythe; Janet S de Moor; Bradford W Hesse; Neeraj K Arora
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-06-17

8.  Effectiveness of treatment summaries in increasing breast and colorectal cancer survivors' knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Mary Jo Nissen; Michaela L Tsai; Anne H Blaes; Karen K Swenson; Susan Koering
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 4.442

9.  A feasibility study to evaluate breast cancer patients' knowledge of their diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Stephanie M Smith; Raymond R Balise; Catherine Norton; Mary M Chen; Alissa N Flesher; Alice E Guardino
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-09-30

10.  Leveraging electronic health record systems to create and provide electronic cancer survivorship care plans: a pilot study.

Authors:  Amye J Tevaarwerk; Kari B Wisinski; Kevin A Buhr; Ucheanna O Njiaju; May Tun; Sarah Donohue; Navnit Sekhon; Thomas Yen; Douglas A Wiegmann; Mary E Sesto
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.