Literature DB >> 21734334

Analysis of the local worst-case SAR exposure caused by an MRI multi-transmit body coil in anatomical models of the human body.

Esra Neufeld1, Marie-Christine Gosselin, Manuel Murbach, Andreas Christ, Eugenia Cabot, Niels Kuster.   

Abstract

Multi-transmit coils are increasingly being employed in high-field magnetic resonance imaging, along with a growing interest in multi-transmit body coils. However, they can lead to an increase in whole-body and local specific absorption rate (SAR) compared to conventional body coils excited in circular polarization for the same total incident input power. In this study, the maximum increase of SAR for three significantly different human anatomies is investigated for a large 3 T (128 MHz) multi-transmit body coil using numerical simulations and a (generalized) eigenvalue-based approach. The results demonstrate that the increase of SAR strongly depends on the anatomy. For the three models and normalization to the sum of the rung currents squared, the whole-body averaged SAR increases by up to a factor of 1.6 compared to conventional excitation and the peak spatial SAR (averaged over any 10 cm(3) of tissue) by up to 13.4. For some locations the local averaged SAR goes up as much as 800 times (130 when looking only at regions where it is above 1% of the peak spatial SAR). The ratio of the peak spatial SAR to the whole-body SAR increases by a factor of up to 47 and can reach values above 800. Due to the potentially much larger power deposition, additional, preferably patient-specific, considerations are necessary to avoid injuries by such systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21734334     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/15/002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

1.  Parallel transmission pulse design with explicit control for the specific absorption rate in the presence of radiofrequency errors.

Authors:  Adrian Martin; Emanuele Schiavi; Yigitcan Eryaman; Joaquin L Herraiz; Borjan Gagoski; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Lawrence L Wald; Bastien Guerin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Advances in Computational Human Phantoms and Their Applications in Biomedical Engineering - A Topical Review.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Esra Neufeld; Wesley E Bolch; Christian G Graff; Chan Hyeong Kim; Niels Kuster; Bryn Lloyd; Tina Morrison; Paul Segars; Yeon Soo Yeom; Maria Zankl; X George Xu; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-01

3.  Parallel transmission RF pulse design with strict temperature constraints.

Authors:  Cem M Deniz; Giuseppe Carluccio; Christopher Collins
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Brain Tissue Conductivity Measurements with MR-Electrical Properties Tomography: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Stefano Mandija; Petar I Petrov; Jord J T Vink; Sebastian F W Neggers; Cornelis A T van den Berg
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Predicting long-term temperature increase for time-dependent SAR levels with a single short-term temperature response.

Authors:  Giuseppe Carluccio; Mary Bruno; Christopher M Collins
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Effects of Anatomical Differences on Electromagnetic Fields, SAR, and Temperature Change.

Authors:  Leeor Alon; Cem Murat Deniz; Giuseppe Carluccio; Ryan Brown; Daniel K Sodickson; Christopher M Collins
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.176

7.  Fetal MRI: A Technical Update with Educational Aspirations.

Authors:  Ali Gholipour; Judith A Estroff; Carol E Barnewolt; Richard L Robertson; P Ellen Grant; Borjan Gagoski; Simon K Warfield; Onur Afacan; Susan A Connolly; Jeffrey J Neil; Adam Wolfberg; Robert V Mulkern
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.481

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance safety.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-03

9.  CEM43°C thermal dose thresholds: a potential guide for magnetic resonance radiofrequency exposure levels?

Authors:  Gerard C van Rhoon; Theodoros Samaras; Pavel S Yarmolenko; Mark W Dewhirst; Esra Neufeld; Niels Kuster
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  RF Safety Evaluation of a Breast Tissue Expander Device for MRI: Numerical Simulation and Experiment.

Authors:  Bu S Park; Amir Razjouyan; Leonardo M Angelone; Brent McCright; Sunder S Rajan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.