PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of combined electromagnetic device tracking and computed tomography (CT)/ultrasonography (US)/fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) fusion for real-time feedback during percutaneous and intraoperative biopsies and hepatic radiofrequency (RF) ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved prospective study with written informed consent, 25 patients (17 men, eight women) underwent 33 percutaneous and three intraoperative biopsies of 36 FDG-avid targets between November 2007 and August 2010. One patient underwent biopsy and RF ablation of an FDG-avid hepatic focus. Targets demonstrated heterogeneous FDG uptake or were not well seen or were totally inapparent at conventional imaging. Preprocedural FDG PET scans were rigidly registered through a semiautomatic method to intraprocedural CT scans. Coaxial biopsy needle introducer tips and RF ablation electrode guider needle tips containing electromagnetic sensor coils were spatially tracked through an electromagnetic field generator. Real-time US scans were registered through a fiducial-based method, allowing US scans to be fused with intraprocedural CT and preacquired FDG PET scans. A visual display of US/CT image fusion with overlaid coregistered FDG PET targets was used for guidance; navigation software enabled real-time biopsy needle and needle electrode navigation and feedback. RESULTS: Successful fusion of real-time US to coregistered CT and FDG PET scans was achieved in all patients. Thirty-one of 36 biopsies were diagnostic (malignancy in 18 cases, benign processes in 13 cases). RF ablation resulted in resolution of targeted FDG avidity, with no local treatment failure during short follow-up (56 days). CONCLUSION: Combined electromagnetic device tracking and image fusion with real-time feedback may facilitate biopsies and ablations of focal FDG PET abnormalities that would be challenging with conventional image guidance.
PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of combined electromagnetic device tracking and computed tomography (CT)/ultrasonography (US)/fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) fusion for real-time feedback during percutaneous and intraoperative biopsies and hepatic radiofrequency (RF) ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved prospective study with written informed consent, 25 patients (17 men, eight women) underwent 33 percutaneous and three intraoperative biopsies of 36 FDG-avid targets between November 2007 and August 2010. One patient underwent biopsy and RF ablation of an FDG-avid hepatic focus. Targets demonstrated heterogeneous FDG uptake or were not well seen or were totally inapparent at conventional imaging. Preprocedural FDG PET scans were rigidly registered through a semiautomatic method to intraprocedural CT scans. Coaxial biopsy needle introducer tips and RF ablation electrode guider needle tips containing electromagnetic sensor coils were spatially tracked through an electromagnetic field generator. Real-time US scans were registered through a fiducial-based method, allowing US scans to be fused with intraprocedural CT and preacquired FDG PET scans. A visual display of US/CT image fusion with overlaid coregistered FDG PET targets was used for guidance; navigation software enabled real-time biopsy needle and needle electrode navigation and feedback. RESULTS: Successful fusion of real-time US to coregistered CT and FDG PET scans was achieved in all patients. Thirty-one of 36 biopsies were diagnostic (malignancy in 18 cases, benign processes in 13 cases). RF ablation resulted in resolution of targeted FDG avidity, with no local treatment failure during short follow-up (56 days). CONCLUSION: Combined electromagnetic device tracking and image fusion with real-time feedback may facilitate biopsies and ablations of focal FDG PET abnormalities that would be challenging with conventional image guidance.
Authors: Servet Tatli; Victor H Gerbaudo; Marcelo Mamede; Kemal Tuncali; Paul B Shyn; Stuart G Silverman Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Andrea Lupi; Marta Zaroccolo; Matteo Salgarello; Veronica Malfatti; Pierluigi Zanco Journal: Ann Nucl Med Date: 2009-02-19 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Alda L Tam; Howard J Lim; Ignacio I Wistuba; Anobel Tamrazi; Michael D Kuo; Etay Ziv; Stephen Wong; Albert J Shih; Robert J Webster; Gregory S Fischer; Sunitha Nagrath; Suzanne E Davis; Sarah B White; Kamran Ahrar Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Elliot B Levy; Maria I Fiel; Stanley R Hamilton; David E Kleiner; Shannon J McCall; Peter Schirmacher; William Travis; Michael D Kuo; Robert D Suh; Alda L Tam; Shaheen U Islam; Katherine Ferry-Galow; Rebecca A Enos; James H Doroshow; Hala R Makhlouf Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 44.544