Literature DB >> 21731732

Reduced bone mass and muscle strength in male 5α-reductase type 1 inactivated mice.

Sara H Windahl1, Niklas Andersson, Anna E Börjesson, Charlotte Swanson, Johan Svensson, Sofia Movérare-Skrtic, Klara Sjögren, Ruijin Shao, Marie K Lagerquist, Claes Ohlsson.   

Abstract

Androgens are important regulators of bone mass but the relative importance of testosterone (T) versus dihydrotestosterone (DHT) for the activation of the androgen receptor (AR) in bone is unknown. 5α-reductase is responsible for the irreversible conversion of T to the more potent AR activator DHT. There are two well established isoenzymes of 5α-reductase (type 1 and type 2), encoded by separate genes (Srd5a1 and Srd5a2). 5α-reductase type 2 is predominantly expressed in male reproductive tissues whereas 5α-reductase type 1 is highly expressed in liver and moderately expressed in several other tissues including bone. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of 5α-reductase type 1 for bone mass using Srd5a1⁻/⁻ mice. Four-month-old male Srd5a1⁻/⁻ mice had reduced trabecular bone mineral density (-36%, p<0.05) and cortical bone mineral content (-15%, p<0.05) but unchanged serum androgen levels compared with wild type (WT) mice. The cortical bone dimensions were reduced in the male Srd5a1⁻/⁻ mice as a result of a reduced cortical periosteal circumference compared with WT mice. T treatment increased the cortical periosteal circumference (p<0.05) in orchidectomized WT mice but not in orchidectomized Srd5a1⁻/⁻ mice. Male Srd5a1⁻/⁻ mice demonstrated a reduced forelimb muscle grip strength compared with WT mice (p<0.05). Female Srd5a1⁻/⁻ mice had slightly increased cortical bone mass associated with elevated circulating levels of androgens. In conclusion, 5α-reductase type 1 inactivated male mice have reduced bone mass and forelimb muscle grip strength and we propose that these effects are due to lack of 5α-reductase type 1 expression in bone and muscle. In contrast, the increased cortical bone mass in female Srd5a1⁻/⁻ mice, is an indirect effect mediated by elevated circulating androgen levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21731732      PMCID: PMC3120862          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Androgens are of major importance for bone growth and maintenance [1]–[3]. The effects of testosterone (T) can be exerted either directly through the androgen receptor (AR) or indirectly through aromatization to estrogens, exerting their effects through estrogen receptors (ERα and/or ERβ [1], [2]). All these receptors are expressed both in growth plate cartilage and in bone [4]–[8]. Both ERα-activation and AR-activation but not ERβ-activation are required for a normal bone mass and bone health in males [9]–[14]. 5α-reductase enzymes are responsible for the irreversible conversion of T to the more potent AR activator DHT. We have previously reported that DHT treatment increases bone mass in orchidectomized mice and that this effect is independent of estrogen receptors [11]. The relative importance of endogenous T versus DHT for the activation of the AR in bone is unknown. The DHT-AR complex has a longer half-life and a higher DNA binding affinity than the T-AR complex. Therefore, the effective dose of DHT, required to activate an androgen responsive marker gene by 50%, is about 10-fold lower than that required to achieve the same level of induction with T [15]–[19]. It is proposed that the conversion of T to DHT by tissue specific 5α-reductase activity results in a tissue specific signal amplification of the androgenic activity [20]. There are two well established isoenzymes of 5α-reductase (type 1 and type 2), encoded by separate genes (Srd5a1 and Srd5a2; [21]–[25]). In addition, it has recently been proposed by Uemeura et al that a third 5α-reductase enzyme, type 3 encoded by Srd5a3, has the capacity to produce DHT from T [25]. However, others claim that 5α-reductase type 3 has little or no functional ability to reduce steroid substrates but rather has a crucial role in N-linked protein glycosylation [21], [24]. Both 5α-reductase type 1 and type 2 clearly have the capacity to convert T to DHT but they have different tissue distribution and enzymatic activities. 5α-reductase enzymes have the capacity to catalyse not only anabolic but also catabolic reactions in the androgen metabolism [26]. Thus, conversion of T into DHT also marks the latter hormone for degradation to the inactive compound 3α-Adiol [27]. The biochemical properties and tissue distribution of the type 1 isoenzyme are those of a catabolic agent, with a low affinity for steroid substrates and a high expression in the liver. In contrast, a high substrate affinity and a predominant expression in male reproductive tissues indicate that the type 2 isoenzyme is an anabolic entity [26]. However, 5α-reductase type 1 is not only expressed in the liver but also in several peripheral tissues including bone and cartilage, suggesting that it might be involved in signal amplification of the androgenic activity in the skeleton [28]–[30]. There are no reported cases of 5α-reductase type 1 deficiency in humans. Female Srd5a1 −/− mice exhibit a parturition defect due to impaired cervical ripening caused by a defected local catabolism of progesterone [31], while male mice have an apparent normal reproductive phenotype [27]. Since 5α-reductase type 1 is expressed in bone and has the capacity to amplify the androgenic signal, we hypothesized that 5α-reductase type 1 mediated local conversion of T to the more potent androgen DHT might be of importance for bone metabolism. We, therefore, analyzed the skeletal phenotype of Srd5a1 −/− mice.

Results

Tissue distribution of 5α-reductase isoforms

The mRNA levels of the two well established 5α-reductase isoforms, type 1 and type 2, were analyzed in several tissues from adult wild type (WT) mice. The highest mRNA levels of 5α-reductase type 1 were found in liver, while the highest levels of 5α-reductase type 2 were found in male reproductive tissues (epididymis and prostate; Fig. 1). The type 1 mRNA levels were ≅100-fold while the type 2 mRNA levels were as much as ≅50.000-fold lower in bone compared with the tissue with the highest expression of the respective 5α-reductase isoform (Fig. 1). In addition, we analyzed the tissue distribution of the proposed, but less established, 5α-reductase type 3 enzyme, demonstrating the highest mRNA levels in male reproductive tissues and ≅10-fold lower mRNA levels in liver and bone (Fig. 1). The general tissue distribution of the three 5α-reductase isoforms in non-reproductive tissues did not differ between male and female mice.
Figure 1

Tissue distribution of 5α-reductase type 1–3.

Real-time PCR showing the relative mRNA levels of Srd5a1 (type 1), Srd5a2 (type 2), and Srd5a3 (type 3) in epididymis (Ep), prostate (Pr), liver (Li), bone (Bo) and heart (He). Values are given as % of levels in epididymis and are means ± SEM (males n = 5, females n = 5).

Tissue distribution of 5α-reductase type 1–3.

Real-time PCR showing the relative mRNA levels of Srd5a1 (type 1), Srd5a2 (type 2), and Srd5a3 (type 3) in epididymis (Ep), prostate (Pr), liver (Li), bone (Bo) and heart (He). Values are given as % of levels in epididymis and are means ± SEM (males n = 5, females n = 5).

Body weight and visceral organs in Srd5a1 mice

There was no significant difference in body weight, crown-rump length or tibia length between Srd5a1 −/− and WT mice (Table 1). Furthermore, Srd5a1 −/− mice displayed normal weights of seminal vesicles, uterus and gonadal fat. Female but not male Srd5a1 −/− mice had reduced thymus weight compared with WT mice (Table 1).
Table 1

Body and organ weights.

MaleFemale
WT (n = 7)KO (n = 8)WT (n = 13)KO (n = 8)
Body weight (g)34.2±0.831.6±1.425.6±0.626.9±1.9
Crown-rump length (mm)60.5±0.459.4±0.556.8±0.657.3±1.0
Tibia length (mm)19.0±0.218.8±0.218.4±0.218.5±0.2
Seminal vesicle weight/BW (mg/g)7.9±0.48.1±0.8NANA
Uterus weight/BW (mg/g)NANA5.6±0.54.2±0.4
Gonadal fat weight/BW (mg/g)33.6±2.832.5±3.351.9±3.145.5±5.1
Thymus weight/BW (mg/g)1.6±0.11.5±0.12.5±0.22.0±0.1*
Liver weight/BW (mg/g)35.2±1.736.2±1.335.8±1.537.1±1.5
M. tibialis weight/BW (mg/g)1.31±0.071.22±0.071.15±0.041.18±0.06
M. quadriceps weight/BW (mg/g)6.19±0.255.95±0.375.56±0.205.45±0.34

Four-month-old Srd5α1 −/− (KO) and wild type (WT) mice. Values are means ± SEM.

*p<0.05 Student's t-test versus WT, NA = not applicable, BW = body weight, M = Muscle.

Four-month-old Srd5α1 −/− (KO) and wild type (WT) mice. Values are means ± SEM. *p<0.05 Student's t-test versus WT, NA = not applicable, BW = body weight, M = Muscle.

Reduced areal BMD and BMC in Srd5a1 mice

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of tibia demonstrated that the areal BMD (−8.9%, p<0.05) and the BMC (−17.8%, p<0.01) were reduced in four-month-old male Srd5a1 −/− mice compared with male WT mice (Fig. 2). Neither areal BMD nor BMC was significantly affected in female Srd5a1 −/− mice compared to female WT mice.
Figure 2

Reduced areal BMD and BMC in male Srd5α1 mice.

Areal bone mineral density (BMD; A) and bone mineral content (BMC; B) of tibia as analyzed by DXA in four-month-old Srd5α1 (KO; males n = 8, females n = 8) and wild type (WT; males n = 7, females n = 13) mice. Values are given as means ± SEM. * p<0.05 Student's t-test versus WT.

Reduced areal BMD and BMC in male Srd5α1 mice.

Areal bone mineral density (BMD; A) and bone mineral content (BMC; B) of tibia as analyzed by DXA in four-month-old Srd5α1 (KO; males n = 8, females n = 8) and wild type (WT; males n = 7, females n = 13) mice. Values are given as means ± SEM. * p<0.05 Student's t-test versus WT.

Reduced trabecular BMD and cortical BMC in male, but increased cortical BMC in female Srd5a1 −/− mice

As the DXA technique cannot distinguish between the cortical and trabecular bone compartments, detailed analyses using pQCT were performed to further characterize the bone phenotype in Srd5a1 −/− mice. The trabecular BMD was reduced (−36%, p<0.05) in male Srd5a1 −/− mice compared with WT mice while it was not significantly affected in female Srd5a1 −/− mice (Fig. 3). Cortical bone parameters were determined with mid-diaphyseal pQCT scans of the long bones. The cortical bone mineral content (BMC) was decreased in male (−14.6%, p<0.05) but slightly increased in female (+9.1%, p<0.05) Srd5a1 −/− mice compared with WT mice (Fig. 4A). The reduced cortical BMC in male Srd5a1 −/− mice was due to a reduced cortical bone area (−13.9%; p<0.05) while the cortical BMD was unaffected compared with WT mice (Fig. 4B and Table 2). The cortical bone area, in turn, was reduced as a result of reduced periosteal circumference (Fig. 4C; −9.8%, p<0.05). Consequently, male Srd5a1 −/− mice displayed a reduction of cortical bone parameters reflecting bone strength, including cortical cross-sectional moment of inertia and cortical moment of resistance (p<0.05; Table 2). The increased cortical BMC in female Srd5a1 −/− mice was due to an increased cortical bone area (+7.9%; p<0.05) associated with an increased cortical thickness (+9.6%; p<0.05; Fig. 4B, Table 2).
Figure 3

Reduced trabecular BMD in male Srd5α1 −/− mice.

Trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) as analyzed by pQCT in the distal metaphyseal region of femur in four-month-old Srd5α1 −/− (KO; males n = 8, females n = 8) and wild type (WT; males n = 7, females n = 12) mice. Values are given as means ± SEM. * p<0.05 Student's t-test versus WT.

Figure 4

Cortical bone parameters in Srd5α1 mice.

Cortical bone mineral content (BMC; A), area (B) and periosteal circumference (PC; C) as analyzed by pQCT in the mid diaphyseal region of femur in four-month-old Srd5α1 −/− (KO; males n = 8, females n = 8) and wild type (WT; males n = 7, females n = 12) mice. Values are given as means ± SEM. * p<0.05 Student's t-test versus WT.

Table 2

Cortical bone parameters.

MaleFemale
WT (n = 7)KO (n = 8)WT (n = 12)KO (n = 8)
Cortical vBMD (mg/cm3)1278±81266±91253±51268±8
Cortical thickness (µm)252±9243±6204±2224±3*
Endosteal circumference (mm)3.88±0.133.40±0.1* 3.36±0.053.22±0.05
MR (mm3)0.65±0.040.50±0.04* 0.39±0.010.42±0.02
MI (mm4)0.68±0.060.46±0.05* 0.32±0.010.33±0.02

Cortical bone parameter as analyzed by pQCT in the mid diaphyseal region of femur in four-month-old Srd5α1 −/− (KO) and wild type (WT) mice. vBMD = volumetric bone mineral density, MR = cortical cross sectional moment of resistance, MI = cortical cross sectional moment of inertia. Values are means ± SEM.

*p<0.05 Student's t-test versus WT.

Reduced trabecular BMD in male Srd5α1 −/− mice.

Trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) as analyzed by pQCT in the distal metaphyseal region of femur in four-month-old Srd5α1 −/− (KO; males n = 8, females n = 8) and wild type (WT; males n = 7, females n = 12) mice. Values are given as means ± SEM. * p<0.05 Student's t-test versus WT.

Cortical bone parameters in Srd5α1 mice.

Cortical bone mineral content (BMC; A), area (B) and periosteal circumference (PC; C) as analyzed by pQCT in the mid diaphyseal region of femur in four-month-old Srd5α1 −/− (KO; males n = 8, females n = 8) and wild type (WT; males n = 7, females n = 12) mice. Values are given as means ± SEM. * p<0.05 Student's t-test versus WT. Cortical bone parameter as analyzed by pQCT in the mid diaphyseal region of femur in four-month-old Srd5α1 −/− (KO) and wild type (WT) mice. vBMD = volumetric bone mineral density, MR = cortical cross sectional moment of resistance, MI = cortical cross sectional moment of inertia. Values are means ± SEM. *p<0.05 Student's t-test versus WT. As expected, male WT mice had higher trabecular BMD (+76.2%, p<0.05) and cortical periosteal circumference (+17.7%, p<0.05) than female WT mice. In contrast, no significant gender difference for these two parameters was seen in Srd5a1 −/− mice (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4). Thus, the normal gender differences on trabecular BMD and outer dimensions of the cortical bone were lost in Srd5a1 −/− mice. Neither the trabecular BMD nor the cortical BMC were affected in one-month-old pre-pubertal Srd5a1 −/− mice compared with WT mice (data not shown).

Elevated androgen levels in female Srd5a1 −/− mice

Serum levels of androgens and estradiol were not affected in male Srd5a1 −/− mice while both serum levels of T and DHT were increased in adult female Srd5a1 −/− mice compared with WT mice (Table 3). To investigate if the increase in serum androgens in female Srd5a1 −/− was due to a disturbed central negative feed-back regulation, serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH) were analyzed. Serum LH levels were not increased but rather decreased in female Srd5a1 −/− compared with WT mice, suggesting a normal central negative feed-back regulation of serum sex steroids in female Srd5a1 −/− mice (Table 3). To address the possibility that the high serum androgens could be the result of a local disturbance in the ovaries associated with elevated androgen synthesis, the ovarian morphology and LH receptor (LHR) mRNA levels were analyzed. The ovaries in Srd5a1 −/− mice had a normal morphology (Fig. 5), and the LHR mRNA levels were unaffected (WT 1.0±0.3 and Srd5a1 −/− 1.1±0.2 LHR/GAPDH ratio; non-significant). Female Srd5a1 −/− mice had unchanged serum estradiol levels (Table 3) and displayed a normal estrus cycle, with unaffected cycle length (WT 4.2±0.2 days, Srd5a1 −/− 4.3±0.3 days; non-significant).
Table 3

Serum levels of hormones and mRNA levels of major urinary protein and prolactin receptor in liver.

MaleFemale
WT (n = 7)KO (n = 8)WT (n = 13)KO (n = 8)
Estradiol (pg/ml)8.5±1.09.6±1.214.5±1.113.8±1.2
Testosterone (ng/ml)6.7±1.26.5±1.1ND0.43±0.24*
DHT (ng/ml)1.59±0.331.48±0.280.14±0.020.41±0.10*
LH (ng/ml)NANA0.25±0.050.11±0.03*
IGF-1 (ng/ml)200±12220±14174±13188±19
Mup/GAPDH ratio2.30±0.482.21±0.490.12±0.020.16±0.06
Prlr/GAPDH ratio0.71±0.210.49±0.152.06±0.242.44±0.51

Serum hormone levels and relative amounts of liver major urinary protein (mup) and prolactin receptor (Prlr) mRNA were measured in four-month-old Srd5α1 −/− (KO) and wild type (WT) mice. Values are given as means ± SEM.

*p<0.05 vs. wild-type (WT), NA = not available, ND = not detectable, DHT = dihydrotestosterone, LH = luteinizing hormone, IGF-I = insulin like growth factor 1.

Figure 5

Ovarian morphology of WT and Srd5a1 −/− (KO) mice.

Hematoxylin and eosin stained ovarian sections from WT and KO mice. Bar scale: 500 µm.

Ovarian morphology of WT and Srd5a1 −/− (KO) mice.

Hematoxylin and eosin stained ovarian sections from WT and KO mice. Bar scale: 500 µm. Serum hormone levels and relative amounts of liver major urinary protein (mup) and prolactin receptor (Prlr) mRNA were measured in four-month-old Srd5α1 −/− (KO) and wild type (WT) mice. Values are given as means ± SEM. *p<0.05 vs. wild-type (WT), NA = not available, ND = not detectable, DHT = dihydrotestosterone, LH = luteinizing hormone, IGF-I = insulin like growth factor 1. To evaluate if the partial feminization of the male skeleton was due to alterations in serum insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) and/or the growth hormone (GH)-secretion pattern, serum levels of IGF-1 as well as major urinary protein (MUP; high levels reflecting a male GH-secretion pattern; [32]) and prolactin receptor (high levels reflecting a female GH-secretion pattern) mRNA levels in the liver were measured. As expected, WT males had higher MUP and lower prolactin receptor mRNA levels in the liver compared to female mice. However, serum IGF-I, MUP mRNA and prolactin receptor mRNA levels were not affected in Srd5a1 −/− mice compared with WT mice (Table 3).

Reduced effect of testosterone on cortical bone parameters in orchidectomized Srd5a1 −/− mice

To determine if the responses to T treatment were affected by 5α-reductase inactivation, orchidectomized (orx) Srd5a1 −/− mice and orx WT mice were treated with T or placebo for four weeks. As expected, weights of seminal vesicles and prostate, trabecular BMD, cortical BMC and cortical periosteal circumference were increased, while the weight of thymus was decreased by T treatment in orx WT mice (Table 4). The significant effects of T on prostate weight, trabecular BMD and thymus weight were similar in orx Srd5a1 −/− mice compared with orx WT. In contrast, no significant effect of T was seen on the cortical bone parameters in orx Srd5a1 −/− mice (Table 4, Fig. 6).
Table 4

Effect of T treatment in orchidectomized mice.

WT(% over orx placebo)KO(% over orx placebo)
Seminal vesicles weight/BW1028±58* 1413±111*
Prostate weight/BW390±29* 430±37*
Thymus weight/BW−62±4* −73±4*
Trabecular BMD110±16* 136±29*
Cortical BMC16±3* 12±4
Cortical area13±2* 10±4
Cortical PC4.9±1,4* 1.5±1,7
Cortical EC2.8±1,8−3.0±2,3
Cortical MR27±5* 12±6
Cortical MI29±7* 12±7

Four-month-old orchidectomized (orx) mice were either treated with placebo or testosterone (1.5 mg/60days) for four weeks. The effect of testosterone is given as the testosterone treated group expressed as percent over the placebo treated group in Srd5α1 −/− (KO) and wild type (WT) mice (WT orx n = 12, WT orx+T n = 10, KO orx n = 8, KO orx+T n = 8). Values are means ± SEM. BW = body weight, BMC = bone mineral content, BMD = bone mineral density, PC = periosteal circumference, EC = endosteal circumference, MR = cross sectional moment of resistance, MI = cross sectional moment of inertia.

*p<0.05 testosterone treated versus orx placebo.

Figure 6

Tissue dependent testosterone response in orchidectomized Srd5α1 mice.

Four-month-old orchidectomized mice were either treated with placebo or testosterone (1.5 mg/60days) for four weeks. The bars represent the testosterone response in percent for the Srd5α1 −/− mice compared to the testosterone response in WT mice. Thus, 0% means no testosterone response while 100% is a normal WT testosterone response (WT orx n = 12, WT orx+T n = 10, KO orx n = 8, KO orx+T n = 8). Values are given as means ± SEM. Weights of seminal vesicle (SV), prostate and thymus were adjusted for body weight. BMC = bone mineral content, BMD = bone mineral density, PC = periosteal circumference, MR = cortical cross sectional moment of resistance, MI = cortical cross sectional moment of inertia. Values are given as means ± SEM.

Tissue dependent testosterone response in orchidectomized Srd5α1 mice.

Four-month-old orchidectomized mice were either treated with placebo or testosterone (1.5 mg/60days) for four weeks. The bars represent the testosterone response in percent for the Srd5α1 −/− mice compared to the testosterone response in WT mice. Thus, 0% means no testosterone response while 100% is a normal WT testosterone response (WT orx n = 12, WT orx+T n = 10, KO orx n = 8, KO orx+T n = 8). Values are given as means ± SEM. Weights of seminal vesicle (SV), prostate and thymus were adjusted for body weight. BMC = bone mineral content, BMD = bone mineral density, PC = periosteal circumference, MR = cortical cross sectional moment of resistance, MI = cortical cross sectional moment of inertia. Values are given as means ± SEM. Four-month-old orchidectomized (orx) mice were either treated with placebo or testosterone (1.5 mg/60days) for four weeks. The effect of testosterone is given as the testosterone treated group expressed as percent over the placebo treated group in Srd5α1 −/− (KO) and wild type (WT) mice (WT orx n = 12, WT orx+T n = 10, KO orx n = 8, KO orx+T n = 8). Values are means ± SEM. BW = body weight, BMC = bone mineral content, BMD = bone mineral density, PC = periosteal circumference, EC = endosteal circumference, MR = cross sectional moment of resistance, MI = cross sectional moment of inertia. *p<0.05 testosterone treated versus orx placebo.

Reduced forelimb muscle grip strength in Srd5a1 −/− mice

The weights of the tibialis and quadriceps muscles were not significantly affected in Srd5a1 −/− mice compared with WT mice (Table 1). Interestingly, male Srd5a1 −/− mice had reduced forelimb muscle strength compared with WT mice (Fig. 7). In addition, T treated but not placebo treated orx Srd5a1 −/− mice had reduced forelimb muscle grip strength compared with corresponding WT mice (Fig. 7). Thus, in the presence of either endogenous or exogenous T, but not in the T deficient state, male Srd5a1 −/− mice demonstrated a reduced grip strength.
Figure 7

Reduced forelimb grip strength in male Srd5α1 −/− mice.

Grip strength in four-month-old gonadal intact (sham-operated) Srd5α1 −/− (KO; n = 18) and wild type (WT; n = 27) mice. In addition, four-month-old orchidectomized (orx) KO and WT mice were either treated with placebo (Orx) or testosterone (Orx+T) for four weeks (WT orx n = 13, WT orx+T n = 13, KO orx n = 8, KO orx+T n = 8). Values are means ± SEM. * p<0.05 Student's t-test versus WT.

Reduced forelimb grip strength in male Srd5α1 −/− mice.

Grip strength in four-month-old gonadal intact (sham-operated) Srd5α1 −/− (KO; n = 18) and wild type (WT; n = 27) mice. In addition, four-month-old orchidectomized (orx) KO and WT mice were either treated with placebo (Orx) or testosterone (Orx+T) for four weeks (WT orx n = 13, WT orx+T n = 13, KO orx n = 8, KO orx+T n = 8). Values are means ± SEM. * p<0.05 Student's t-test versus WT.

Discussion

Androgens are important regulators of bone mass, but the relative importance of T versus DHT for the activation of the AR in bone is unknown. Using Srd5a1 mice, we herein provide evidence that 5α-reductase type 1 mediated conversion of T to DHT in the target tissue results in a signal amplification of the androgenic activity on bone mass and muscle strength without affecting circulating androgen levels in male mice. In contrast, in female mice 5α-reductase type 1 is mainly involved in the degradation of androgens, supported by elevated circulating androgen levels in female Srd5a1 mice. The main finding of the present study was that male Srd5a1 −/− mice had reduced bone mass although their circulating androgen levels were unaffected. DXA analysis demonstrated that male Srd5a1 −/− mice had reduced areal BMD and further pQCT analysis revealed that it was caused by a combination of reduced trabecular BMD and cortical bone size compared with WT mice. This bone phenotype resembles the phenotype seen in partial T deficient male mice [2] suggesting that it was caused by a lack of a local 5α-reductase type 1 dependent amplification of the androgenic signaling by conversion of T to the more potent androgen DHT locally in bone. It is a limitation with the present study that we did not treat the Srd5a1 −/− mice with DHT as it would have been a definitive proof that these KO mice can respond to DHT and it might have provided some insight on the relative importance of circulating vs. locally produced DHT. A specific role of 5α-reductase type 1 in bone is supported by our finding that the response to T treatment in orx Srd5a1 −/− mice was reduced in cortical bone but not in some other T responsive tissues. The normal gender difference with larger outer dimensions of the cortical bone in males versus females was lost in the Srd5a1 −/− mice. The sexual dimorphism of the skeleton has been linked to gender differences in the GH-secretion pattern [32] but parameters reflecting gender specific GH-secretion were not affected in the Srd5a1 −/− mice compared with WT mice, supporting the notion that the skeletal phenotype in male Srd5a1 −/− mice was due to lack of 5α-reductase type 1 expression in bone. A role of 5α-reductase type 1 in bone is supported by previous studies showing that 5α-reductase activity is present in human bone [29] and 5α-reductase type 1 is expressed in cultured osteoblasts [28]. In addition, in the present study we demonstrated that 5α-reductase type 1 is clearly expressed while 5α-reductase type 2 is barely expressed in mouse bone. Our findings suggest that for optimal bone health it is beneficial to use 5α-reductase type 2 specific inhibitors (such as finasteride) and not combined type 2 and type 1 inhibitors in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and/or androgenetic alopecia. Both muscle mass and strength have been associated with bone mass and androgens are important regulators of both muscle mass and strength [13], [33]. Muscle mass was not significantly affected in Srd5a1 −/− mice, but interestingly, male Srd5a1 −/− mice had reduced forelimb muscle strength, suggesting that local 5α-reductase type 1 expression is of importance for the signal amplification of the androgenic activity not only in bone but also in muscle. As exogenous testosterone treatment has been shown to increase both muscle mass and muscle strength it is somewhat unexpected that grip strength but not muscle mass was significantly reduced in the male Srd5a1 −/− mice [34]. However, one cannot exclude that the lack of significant effect on muscle mass was due to the relatively small number of mice evaluated. Our findings may suggest that 5α-reductase type 1 specific enhancers could be useful for the treatment of men with osteoporosis and/or sarcopenia. The total body weight and the weights of several visceral organs, including androgen sensitive organs such as seminal vesicles and thymus were normal in male Srd5a1 −/− mice, indicating that the effects seen on bone mass and muscle strength are tissue-specific in males. The phenotype of the female Srd5a1 −/− mice is clearly confounded by the elevated circulating levels of androgens, which most probably caused the increased cortical bone mass and reduced thymus weight. These two effects are well-established to be caused by supra-physiological androgen treatment [11], [12], [35], [36]. Not only serum T but also serum DHT levels were elevated in the female Srd5a1 −/− mice, demonstrating that 5α-reductase type 1 is not crucial for the conversion of T to DHT in female mice. The elevated serum androgen levels were not the result of a disturbed negative feed-back regulation, supported by the finding that serum LH was not elevated in female Srd5a1 −/− mice. Female Srd5a1 −/− mice displayed a normal ovarian morphology and LH receptor mRNA levels and a normal estrus cycle, with unaffected cycle length, indicating that there was no major ovarian dysfunction leading to increased ovarian T production. The high expression of 5α-reductase type 1 in liver in WT mice together with the elevation of circulating androgen levels in female Srd5a1 −/− mice suggest that the elevated serum androgen levels were a result of the lack of 5α-reductase type 1 dependent inactivation/degradation of androgens in the liver of female Srd5a1 −/− mice. An important role of 5α-reductase type 1 for androgen degradation in females is supported by several previous studies [27], [31], [37], [38]. No elevation of serum androgen levels was seen in male Srd5a1 −/− mice which could be explained by the high expression of 5α-reductase type 2, normally seen in male reproductive tissues, having the capacity to replace the 5α-reductase type 1 enzyme in androgen degradation in male Srd5a1 −/− mice. Since the female Srd5a1 −/− mice had both increased circulating levels of androgens and a deletion of Srd5a1 −/−, the physiological role of Srd5a1 −/− expression in bone cannot be evaluated by using the female Srd5a1 −/− mouse model. However, the female Srd5a1 −/− mouse model could be useful for studies evaluating the role of chronic elevation of circulating androgen levels on for instance metabolism and cardiovascular health. Interestingly, genetic variants in the Srd5a1 gene have been associated with two androgen linked conditions, polycystic ovary syndrome and hirsutism, in females [38]. In conclusion, 5α-reductase type 1 inactivated male mice have reduced bone mass and forelimb muscle grip strength and we propose that these effects might be direct due to lack of 5α-reductase type 1 expression in bone and muscle. In contrast, the increased cortical bone mass in female Srd5a1 −/− mice is an indirect effect caused by elevated circulating androgen levels, which in turn probably is a consequence of 5α-reductase type 1 expression being rate-limiting for androgen degradation in female mice.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Animal care was in accordance with institutional guidelines and the study protocol was approved by the local ethical committee (permit number 362-2005 and 182-2006). All efforts were made to minimize suffering. The mice were housed in a standard animal facility under controlled temperature (22°C) and photoperiod (12 h of light, 12 h of dark) with free access to water and standard food. Srd5a1 /− mice were developed as previously described [27]. Srd5a1 −/− and littermate WT mice were analyzed at 1 (pre-pubertal) and 4 (adult) months of age. In addition, four-month-old orchidectomized (orx) Srd5a1 −/− and WT mice were either treated with placebo or T (1.5 mg/60days) for four weeks using slow release pellets (Innovative Research of America, Sarasota, FL, USA), delivering a physiological dose of T or placebo. Initial detailed dose-response studies of the effect of T established a dose of 1.5 mg/60 days to normalize the weight of the seminal vesicles in orx WT mice.

Dual X-ray absorption analysis

Areal bone mineral density and bone mineral content of excised tibia were measured by DXA using the Lunar PIXImus Mouse Densitometer (Wipro GE Healthcare, Madison, WI).

Peripheral Quantitative Computerized Tomography analyses

Computerized tomography was performed with the STRATEC pQCT XCT, operating at a resolution of 70 µm as previously described [14]. Trabecular BMD was determined ex vivo, with a metaphyseal pQCT scan of the distal femur. The scan was positioned in the metaphysis at a distance from the distal growth plate corresponding to 4% of the total length of the femur, and the trabecular bone region was defined as the inner 45% of the total cross-sectional area. Cortical bone parameters were determined ex vivo with a mid-diaphyseal pQCT scan of the long bones [39].

Serum analyses

Serum analyses were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions for estradiol (Estradiol ELISA, Bioquant, San Diego, CA, sensitivity 5 pg/ml, intra-assay variation 10.3%), T (RIA, MP Biomedicals /ICN Biomedicals, Costa Mesa, CA, sensitivity 0.1 ng/ml, intra-assay variation 9.1%), DHT (ELISA kit from Alpha diagnostic International, San Antonio, TX, sensitivity 25 pg/ml, intra-assay variation 10.5%), luteinizing hormone (RIA AHR002, IDS Biocode-Hycel, Liege, Belgium, sensitivity 0.14 ng/ml, intra-assay variation 10.5%) and insulin like growth factor-1 (RIA, Mediagnost, Reutingen, Germany, sensitivity 0,020 ng/ml, intra-assay variation <3%).

Ovarian analyses and vaginal smears

Ovaries were fixed in a 4% formaldehyde neutral-buffered solution for 24 h at 4°C and embedded in paraffin and sectioned in 5 µm sections for histological analyses. Ovarian sections were deparaffinised, rehydrated and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The stage of cyclicity was determined by microscopic analysis of the predominant cell type in vaginal smears obtained daily during two cycles [40]. The vaginal smears were stained with hematoxylin and eosin using standard protocols and staged by light microscopy. Care was taken to avoid mechanical stimulation of the cervix during this procedure to prevent pseudopregnancy.

Real-time PCR

RNA was prepared from liver, heart, prostate and epididymis using RNeasy kit (#74106, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA from humerus was prepared using TriZol Reagent (Invitrogen, Lidingö, Sweden). The RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using High-capacity cDNA Reverse transcription kit (#4368814, Applied Biosystems, Stockholm, Sweden). Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analyses were performed using the ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System (PE Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). We used pre-designed RT-PCR assays from Applied Biosystems for the analysis of Srd5a1 (Mm00614213_ml), Srd5a2 (Mm01237407_ml), Srd5a3 (Mm00491099_m1), prolactin receptor (Mm00599957_m1), LH receptor (Mm00442931_m1) and GAPDH (internal control, 4352339E) mRNA levels (Applied Biosystems). For analysis of major urinary protein (MUP), the following forward primer MUP-1FP 5′GCT GCT GTG TTT GGG ACT GA, reverse primer MUP-1RP 5′AAG TTC CTT CCC GTA GAA CTA GCTT and probe MUP-1 MGB-Probe 5′CCT AGT CTG TGT CCA TGCA were used.

Forelimb muscle grip strength

The forelimb muscle grip strength was determined using an automated grip strength meter (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). Mice were lifted by their tail and were made to hold a horizontal bar with their forelimbs. Then, the mice were pulled backwards until they could no longer hold the grip. Maximal force was registered during consecutive attempts (four attempts/mouse for sham mice and eight attempts/mouse for orx mice) and the result was set as the average of the four best attempts. The analysis was performed in a blinded fashion.
  40 in total

1.  Human osteoblast-like cells express predominantly steroid 5alpha-reductase type 1.

Authors:  Sedika Issa; Doris Schnabel; Maritta Feix; Lutz Wolf; Hans-Eckart Schaefer; David W Russell; Hans-Udo Schweikert
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Expression of estrogen receptor beta in rat bone.

Authors:  Y Onoe; C Miyaura; H Ohta; S Nozawa; T Suda
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Differential expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta mRNA during differentiation of human osteoblast SV-HFO cells.

Authors:  J Arts; G G Kuiper; J M Janssen; J A Gustafsson; C W Löwik; H A Pols; J P van Leeuwen
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 4.  The role of liver-derived insulin-like growth factor-I.

Authors:  Claes Ohlsson; Subburaman Mohan; Klara Sjögren; Asa Tivesten; Jörgen Isgaard; Olle Isaksson; John-Olov Jansson; Johan Svensson
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 19.871

5.  Estrogen receptor specificity in the regulation of skeletal growth and maturation in male mice.

Authors:  O Vidal; M K Lindberg; K Hollberg; D J Baylink; G Andersson; D B Lubahn; S Mohan; J A Gustafsson; C Ohlsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Expression and localization of estrogen receptor-beta in murine and human bone.

Authors:  O Vidal; L G Kindblom; C Ohlsson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  The dissociation of testosterone- and 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone-receptor complexes formed within cultured human genital skin fibroblasts.

Authors:  M Kaufman; L Pinsky
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 4.292

8.  Variants in the 5alpha-reductase type 1 and type 2 genes are associated with polycystic ovary syndrome and the severity of hirsutism in affected women.

Authors:  Mark O Goodarzi; Nissar A Shah; Heath J Antoine; Marita Pall; Xiuqing Guo; Ricardo Azziz
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Unexpected virilization in male mice lacking steroid 5 alpha-reductase enzymes.

Authors:  M S Mahendroo; K M Cala; D L Hess; D W Russell
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.736

10.  Additive protective effects of estrogen and androgen treatment on trabecular bone in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Asa Tivesten; Sofia Movérare-Skrtic; Andrei Chagin; Katrien Venken; Phil Salmon; Dirk Vanderschueren; Lars Sävendahl; Agneta Holmäng; Claes Ohlsson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-08-23       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Adverse effects of 5α-reductase inhibitors: What do we know, don't know, and need to know?

Authors:  Abdulmaged M Traish; Roberto Cosimo Melcangi; Marco Bortolato; Luis M Garcia-Segura; Michael Zitzmann
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Systems genetics of metabolism: the use of the BXD murine reference panel for multiscalar integration of traits.

Authors:  Pénélope A Andreux; Evan G Williams; Hana Koutnikova; Riekelt H Houtkooper; Marie-France Champy; Hugues Henry; Kristina Schoonjans; Robert W Williams; Johan Auwerx
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Musculoskeletal and prostate effects of combined testosterone and finasteride administration in older hypogonadal men: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen E Borst; Joshua F Yarrow; Christine F Conover; Unyime Nseyo; John R Meuleman; Judyta A Lipinska; Randy W Braith; Darren T Beck; Jeffrey S Martin; Matthew Morrow; Shirley Roessner; Luke A Beggs; Sean C McCoy; Darryl F Cannady; Jonathan J Shuster
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 4.  The role of estrogen and androgen receptors in bone health and disease.

Authors:  Stavros C Manolagas; Charles A O'Brien; Maria Almeida
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  Estrogen receptor-α signaling in osteoblast progenitors stimulates cortical bone accrual.

Authors:  Maria Almeida; Srividhya Iyer; Marta Martin-Millan; Shoshana M Bartell; Li Han; Elena Ambrogini; Melda Onal; Jinhu Xiong; Robert S Weinstein; Robert L Jilka; Charles A O'Brien; Stavros C Manolagas
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 6.  Sex steroid actions in male bone.

Authors:  Dirk Vanderschueren; Michaël R Laurent; Frank Claessens; Evelien Gielen; Marie K Lagerquist; Liesbeth Vandenput; Anna E Börjesson; Claes Ohlsson
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 7.  The role of the androgen receptor in the pathogenesis of obesity and its utility as a target for obesity treatments.

Authors:  Varun S Venkatesh; Mathis Grossmann; Jeffrey D Zajac; Rachel A Davey
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 10.867

Review 8.  Androgens and estrogens in skeletal sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Michaël Laurent; Leen Antonio; Mieke Sinnesael; Vanessa Dubois; Evelien Gielen; Frank Classens; Dirk Vanderschueren
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Eurycoma longifolia: Medicinal Plant in the Prevention and Treatment of Male Osteoporosis due to Androgen Deficiency.

Authors:  Nadia Mohd Effendy; Norazlina Mohamed; Norliza Muhammad; Isa Naina Mohamad; Ahmad Nazrun Shuid
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Loss of 5α-reductase type 1 accelerates the development of hepatic steatosis but protects against hepatocellular carcinoma in male mice.

Authors:  Joanna K Dowman; Laurence J Hopkins; Gary M Reynolds; Matthew J Armstrong; Maryam Nasiri; Nikolaos Nikolaou; E Leonie A F van Houten; Jenny A Visser; Stuart A Morgan; Gareth G Lavery; Andrei Oprescu; Stefan G Hübscher; Philip N Newsome; Jeremy W Tomlinson
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.736

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.