Literature DB >> 21731536

Generic Hockey-Stick Model for Estimating Benchmark Dose and Potency: Performance Relative to BMDS and Application to Anthraquinone.

Kenneth T Bogen1.   

Abstract

Benchmark Dose Model software (BMDS), developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, involves a growing suite of models and decision rules now widely applied to assess noncancer and cancer risk, yet its statistical performance has never been examined systematically. As typically applied, BMDS also ignores the possibility of reduced risk at low doses ("hormesis"). A simpler, proposed Generic Hockey-Stick (GHS) model also estimates benchmark dose and potency, and additionally characterizes and tests objectively for hormetic trend. Using 100 simulated dichotomous-data sets (5 dose groups, 50 animals/group), sampled from each of seven risk functions, GHS estimators performed about as well or better than BMDS estimators, and a surprising observation was that BMDS mis-specified all of six non-hormetic sampled risk functions most or all of the time. When applied to data on rodent tumors induced by the genotoxic chemical carcinogen anthraquinone (AQ), the GHS model yielded significantly negative estimates of net potency exhibited by the combined rodent data, suggesting that-consistent with the anti-leukemogenic properties of AQ and structurally similar quinones-environmental AQ exposures do not likely increase net cancer risk. In addition to its simplicity and flexibility, the GHS approach offers a unified, consistent approach to quantifying environmental chemical risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bootstrap; Monte Carlo; modeling; toxicity risk characterization

Year:  2010        PMID: 21731536      PMCID: PMC3118767          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.10-018.Bogen

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  27 in total

1.  Inhibition of protein kinase CK2 by anthraquinone-related compounds. A structural insight.

Authors:  Erika De Moliner; Stefano Moro; Stefania Sarno; Giuseppe Zagotto; Giuseppe Zanotti; Lorenzo A Pinna; Roberto Battistutta
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-11-04       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Risk analysis for environmental health triage.

Authors:  Kenneth T Bogen
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 3.  New issues in cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  D W Gaylor
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.518

4.  Lung tumors in A/J mice exposed to environmental tobacco smoke: estimated potency and implied human risk.

Authors:  Kenneth T Bogen; Hanspeter Witschi
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  NTP workshop: animal models for the NTP rodent cancer bioassay: stocks and strains--should we switch?

Authors:  Angela King-Herbert; Kristina Thayer
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.902

6.  Commentary: update on animal models for NTP studies.

Authors:  Angela P King-Herbert; Robert C Sills; John R Bucher
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 1.902

7.  Cancer potencies of heterocyclic amines found in cooked foods.

Authors:  K T Bogen
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.023

8.  Photosensitization of human leukemic cells by anthracenedione antitumor agents.

Authors:  J A Hartley; S M Forrow; R L Souhami; K Reszka; J W Lown
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Estimates of cancer potency of 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran using both nonlinear and linear approaches.

Authors:  Ted Simon; Christopher R Kirman; Lesa L Aylward; Robert A Budinsky; J Craig Rowlands; Tom F Long
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Quantification of hormesis in anticancer-agent dose-responses.

Authors:  Marc A Nascarella; Edward J Stanek; George R Hoffmann; Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.658

View more
  2 in total

1.  Family Socioeconomic Position and Lung Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis and a Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Xusen Zou; Runchen Wang; Zhao Yang; Qixia Wang; Wenhai Fu; Zhenyu Huo; Fan Ge; Ran Zhong; Yu Jiang; Jiangfu Li; Shan Xiong; Wen Hong; Wenhua Liang
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-06

2.  Model Averaging with AIC Weights for Hypothesis Testing of Hormesis at Low Doses.

Authors:  Steven B Kim; Nathan Sanders
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.658

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.