Literature DB >> 21731511

Survivorship programs and care plans in practice: variations on a theme.

Erin E Hahn1, Patricia A Ganz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: THIS QUALITATIVE STUDY EXAMINED CANCER SURVIVORSHIP PROGRAMS AT FOUR HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA: an academic medical center, a community hospital, a primary-care medical group, and a county hospital. The purpose was to describe the successful implementation of four distinctly different models of care, focusing on the creative development and use of the Institute of Medicine-recommended survivorship care plan (SCP) document in each setting.
METHODS: In-depth semistructured interviews were done with survivorship teams to characterize each program and the development and use of the SCP at each institution.
RESULTS: Each survivorship program has developed and implemented unique types of SCP documents. Specifically, a comprehensive SCP at the academic center, completed by the clinical team, which covers many facets of cancer survivorship; a patient-directed SCP at the community hospital, completed by the survivor with assistance of an oncology nurse and focused on treatment history and appropriate surveillance; an adapted ASCO SCP template at the primary-care medical group, completed via a partnership with contracted oncologists and focused on the treatment history, surveillance, and shared care between oncology and primary care; an adapted ASCO SCP template at the county hospital, completed by the survivorship nurse practitioner and focused on patient education, post-treatment care, and institutional care coordination.
CONCLUSION: The SCP document is a flexible tool that can be successfully adapted for use in extremely varied settings, from primary care to hospitals, to inform and educate patients and providers alike.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21731511      PMCID: PMC3051864          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2010.000115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  24 in total

1.  Validity and utility of the PRIME-MD patient health questionnaire in assessment of 3000 obstetric-gynecologic patients: the PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire Obstetrics-Gynecology Study.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; J B Williams; K Kroenke; R Hornyak; J McMurray
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Cancer and cardiac mortality among 15-year survivors of cancer diagnosed during childhood or adolescence.

Authors:  D M Green; A Hyland; C S Chung; M A Zevon; B C Hall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Development and evaluation of the nutrition component of the Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Patients (REAP): a new tool for primary care providers.

Authors:  Kim M Gans; Patricia M Risica; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Elizabeth M Ross; Leslie O Strolla; Jerome McMurray; Charles B Eaton
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.045

4.  Validation and utility of the patient health questionnaire in diagnosing mental disorders in 1003 general hospital Spanish inpatients.

Authors:  C Diez-Quevedo; T Rangil; L Sanchez-Planell; K Kroenke; R L Spitzer
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Burden of illness in cancer survivors: findings from a population-based national sample.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; William F Lawrence; Steven Clauser; William W Davis; Martin L Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Survivorship care: essential components and models of delivery.

Authors:  Wendy Landier
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 7.  REAP and WAVE: new tools to rapidly assess/discuss nutrition with patients.

Authors:  Kim M Gans; Elizabeth Ross; Claudia W Barner; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Jerome McMurray; Charles Eaton
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Breast cancer in younger women: reproductive and late health effects of treatment.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz; Gail A Greendale; Laura Petersen; Barbara Kahn; Julienne E Bower
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Risk of selected subsequent carcinomas in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Mylène Bassal; Ann C Mertens; Leslie Taylor; Joseph P Neglia; Brian S Greffe; Sue Hammond; Cécile M Ronckers; Debra L Friedman; Marilyn Stovall; Yutaka Y Yasui; Leslie L Robison; Anna T Meadows; Nina S Kadan-Lottick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 50.717

10.  Acute ovarian failure in the childhood cancer survivor study.

Authors:  Wassim Chemaitilly; Ann C Mertens; Pauline Mitby; John Whitton; Marilyn Stovall; Yutaka Yasui; Leslie L Robison; Charles A Sklar
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 6.134

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of large-scale surveys of cancer survivors conducted in North America, 2000-2011.

Authors:  Catherine C Lerro; Kevin D Stein; Tenbroeck Smith; Katherine S Virgo
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Views of family physicians about survivorship care plans to provide breast cancer follow-up care: exploration of results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M A O'Brien; E Grunfeld; J Sussman; G Porter; M Hammond Mobilio
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Integrating primary care providers in the care of cancer survivors: gaps in evidence and future opportunities.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Denalee M O'malley; Shawna V Hudson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Promotion of self-management for post treatment cancer survivors: evaluation of a risk-adapted visit.

Authors:  Carol A Rosenberg; Carol Flanagan; Bruce Brockstein; Jennifer C Obel; Leon H Dragon; Douglas E Merkel; Elaine L Wade; Teresa M Law; Janardan D Khandekar; Thomas A Hensing
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 5.  Evidence-based recommendations for the organization of long-term follow-up care for childhood and adolescent cancer survivors: a report from the PanCareSurFup Guidelines Working Group.

Authors:  Gisela Michel; Renée L Mulder; Helena J H van der Pal; Roderick Skinner; Edit Bárdi; Morven C Brown; Janine Vetsch; Eva Frey; Rachael Windsor; Leontien C M Kremer; Gill Levitt
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Imaging Surveillance After Definitive Treatment for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Natalia S Partain; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  'They're survivors physically but we want them to survive mentally as well': health care professionals' views on providing potential late effect information.

Authors:  Anna Cox; Sara Faithfull
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Impact of survivorship-based research on defining clinical care guidelines.

Authors:  Melissa M Hudson; Wendy Landier; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Survivorship care plans: is there buy-in from community oncology providers?

Authors:  Talya Salz; Mary S McCabe; Erin E Onstad; Shrujal S Baxi; Richard L Deming; Regina A Franco; Lyn A Glenn; Gregory R Harper; Alcee J Jumonville; Roxanne M Payne; Elissa A Peters; Andrew L Salner; John M Schallenkamp; Sheron R Williams; Kevin Yiee; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Perspectives of a lifelong cancer survivor--improving survivorship care.

Authors:  Ruth Rechis; Sarah R Arvey; Ellen Burke Beckjord
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.