OBJECTIVES: 1. To describe the development of a dietary assessment tool (Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Patients [REAP]) that quickly assesses a patient's diet and physical activity and facilitates brief counselling by a primary care provider, and 2. To describe the evaluation of the REAP in terms of its reliability, validity, and ease of use by primary care providers. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The evaluation of REAP included: 1) an implementation feasibility study conducted with 61 medical students and practicing physicians in practice settings at various medical schools; 2) a calibration study with 44 Brown University Medical School students; 3) cognitive assessment testing with 31 consumers in Rhode Island; and 4) a reliability and calibration study of the revised tool with 94 consumers in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. RESULTS: The feasibility study revealed moderately high rankings on usefulness, ease, practicality, and helpfulness. The calibration studies demonstrated that REAP has excellent test-retest reliability (r = 0.86, P < .0001), is correlated with the Healthy Eating Index score (r = 0.49, P = .0007), and is significantly associated with intake of most nutrients studied. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: REAP has adequate reliability and validity to be used in primary care practices for nutrition assessment and counselling, and is also user-friendly for providers.
OBJECTIVES: 1. To describe the development of a dietary assessment tool (Rapid Eating and Activity Assessment for Patients [REAP]) that quickly assesses a patient's diet and physical activity and facilitates brief counselling by a primary care provider, and 2. To describe the evaluation of the REAP in terms of its reliability, validity, and ease of use by primary care providers. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The evaluation of REAP included: 1) an implementation feasibility study conducted with 61 medical students and practicing physicians in practice settings at various medical schools; 2) a calibration study with 44 Brown University Medical School students; 3) cognitive assessment testing with 31 consumers in Rhode Island; and 4) a reliability and calibration study of the revised tool with 94 consumers in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. RESULTS: The feasibility study revealed moderately high rankings on usefulness, ease, practicality, and helpfulness. The calibration studies demonstrated that REAP has excellent test-retest reliability (r = 0.86, P < .0001), is correlated with the Healthy Eating Index score (r = 0.49, P = .0007), and is significantly associated with intake of most nutrients studied. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: REAP has adequate reliability and validity to be used in primary care practices for nutrition assessment and counselling, and is also user-friendly for providers.
Authors: Eileen R Chasens; Charles W Atwood; Lora E Burke; Mary Korytkowski; Robert Stansbury; Patrick J Strollo; Susan M Sereika Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-12-02 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Sandra Wittleder; Adefunke Ajenikoko; Dylaney Bouwman; Yixin Fang; M Diane McKee; Paul Meissner; Stephanie L Orstad; Colin D Rehm; Scott E Sherman; Shea Smith; Victoria Sweat; Lorena Velastegui; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Melanie Jay Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Triin Umbleja; Todd T Brown; Edgar T Overton; Heather J Ribaudo; Jennifer A Schrack; Kathleen V Fitch; Pamela S Douglas; Steven K Grinspoon; Sarah Henn; Roberto C Arduino; Benigno Rodriguez; Constance A Benson; Kristine M Erlandson Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Brian K Lo; Meredith L Graham; Galen Eldridge; Maria R Donoso; Sara C Folta; David Strogatz; Miriam E Nelson; Lynn C Paul; Stephen A Parry; Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Rima Itani Al-Nimr; K C S Wright; Christina L Aquila; Curtis L Petersen; Tyler L Gooding; John A Batsis Journal: Clin Nutr ESPEN Date: 2020-09-19