BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Few equations for calculating body-fat percentage (BF%) from field methods have been developed in South-Asian children. The objective of this study was to assess agreement between BF% derived from primary reference methods and that from skinfold equations and bio-impedance analysis (BIA) in Indian children. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: We measured BF% in two groups of Indian children. In Pune, 570 rural children aged 6-8 years underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. In Mysore (18)O in doubly labeled water was administered to 59 urban children aged 7-9 years. We conducted BIA at 50 kHz and anthropometry, including sub-scapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses. We used the published equations of Wickramasinghe, Shaikh, Slaughter and Dezenburg to calculate BF% from anthropometric data and the manufacturer's equation for BIA measurements. We assessed agreement with values derived from DXA and doubly labeled water using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Children were light and thin on average compared with international standards. There was poor agreement between the reference BF% values and those from all equations. Assumptions for Bland-Altman analysis were not met for Wickramasinghe, Shaikh and Slaughter equations. The Dezenberg equations under-predicted BF% for most children (mean difference in Pune -13.4, LOA -22.7, -4.0 and in Mysore -7.9, LOA (-13.7 and -2.2). The mean bias for the BIA equation in Pune was +5.0% and in Mysore +1.95%, and the limits of agreement were wide; -5.0, 15.0 and -7.8, 11.7 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available skinfold equations do not accurately predict BF% in Indian children. We recommend development of BIA equations in this population using a four-compartment model.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Few equations for calculating body-fat percentage (BF%) from field methods have been developed in South-Asian children. The objective of this study was to assess agreement between BF% derived from primary reference methods and that from skinfold equations and bio-impedance analysis (BIA) in Indian children. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: We measured BF% in two groups of Indian children. In Pune, 570 rural children aged 6-8 years underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. In Mysore (18)O in doubly labeled water was administered to 59 urban children aged 7-9 years. We conducted BIA at 50 kHz and anthropometry, including sub-scapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses. We used the published equations of Wickramasinghe, Shaikh, Slaughter and Dezenburg to calculate BF% from anthropometric data and the manufacturer's equation for BIA measurements. We assessed agreement with values derived from DXA and doubly labeled water using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Children were light and thin on average compared with international standards. There was poor agreement between the reference BF% values and those from all equations. Assumptions for Bland-Altman analysis were not met for Wickramasinghe, Shaikh and Slaughter equations. The Dezenberg equations under-predicted BF% for most children (mean difference in Pune -13.4, LOA -22.7, -4.0 and in Mysore -7.9, LOA (-13.7 and -2.2). The mean bias for the BIA equation in Pune was +5.0% and in Mysore +1.95%, and the limits of agreement were wide; -5.0, 15.0 and -7.8, 11.7 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available skinfold equations do not accurately predict BF% in Indian children. We recommend development of BIA equations in this population using a four-compartment model.
Authors: M H Slaughter; T G Lohman; R A Boileau; C A Horswill; R J Stillman; M D Van Loan; D A Bemben Journal: Hum Biol Date: 1988-10 Impact factor: 0.553
Authors: Claire M Nightingale; Ghattu V Krishnaveni; Alicja R Rudnicka; Christopher G Owen; Sargoor R Veena; Jacqueline C Hill; Derek G Cook; Caroline H D Fall; Peter H Whincup Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Delan Devakumar; Carlos S Grijalva-Eternod; Sebastian Roberts; Shiva Shankar Chaube; Naomi M Saville; Dharma S Manandhar; Anthony Costello; David Osrin; Jonathan C K Wells Journal: PeerJ Date: 2015-03-03 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Sarah H Kehoe; Ghattu V Krishnaveni; Sargoor Veena; Krishnarajasagara N Kiran; Samuel C Karat; Asha Dhubey; Patsy Coakley; Caroline H D Fall Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Ghattu V Krishnaveni; Sargoor R Veena; Krishnamachari Srinivasan; Clive Osmond; Caroline H D Fall Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Chiara Di Gravio; G V Krishnaveni; R Somashekara; S R Veena; K Kumaran; Murali Krishna; S C Karat; Caroline H D Fall Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 5.095