Literature DB >> 21728816

The efficiency of cell fusion-based reprogramming is affected by the somatic cell type and the in vitro age of somatic cells.

Pollyanna Agnes Tat1, Huseyin Sumer, Daniele Pralong, Paul John Verma.   

Abstract

Cell fusion is one approach that has been used to demonstrate nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells to a pluripotent-like state and is a useful tool for screening factors involved in reprogramming. Recent cell fusion studies reported that the overexpression of Nanog and SalI could improve the efficiency of reprogramming, whereas AID was shown to be essential for DNA demethylation and initiation of reprogramming. The aim of this study was to investigate factors affecting the reprogramming efficiency following cell fusion. We conducted fusions of mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) with somatic cells carrying a GFP transgene under control of the Oct4 promoter (Oct4-GFP), which is normally repressed in nonpluripotent cells. The effect of somatic cell type on the reprogramming efficiency was investigated using Oct4-GFP expression as an indicator. Different somatic cell types were tested including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), adipose tissue-derived cells (ADCs), neural stem cells (NSCs), and these were compared with the mouse embryonic fibroblast (mEF) standard. The reprogramming efficiencies differed greatly, with mEFs (0.477 ± 0.003%) and MSCs (0.313 ± 0.003%) showing highest efficiencies while NSCs (0.023 ± 0.014%), and ADCs (0.006 ± 0.006%) had significantly lower reprogramming efficiencies (p < 0.05). The differences in the reprogramming efficiencies observed could be in part explained by the in vitro age of the somatic cells used. We demonstrated that the reprogramming efficiency of early passage mEFs was significantly higher compared with late passage mEFs (0.330 ± 0.166% vs. 0.021 ± 0.011%, p < 0.05), suggesting that senescence can affect reprogramming potential. In summary, this study shows that different somatic cell types do not have equivalent potential to be reprogrammed following fusion with ESCs. Furthermore, the in vitro age of somatic cells can also affect the reprogrammability of somatic cells. These findings constitute an important consideration for reprogramming studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21728816     DOI: 10.1089/cell.2011.0002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Reprogram        ISSN: 2152-4971            Impact factor:   1.987


  9 in total

1.  The role of SIRT6 protein in aging and reprogramming of human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Amit Sharma; Sebastian Diecke; Wendy Y Zhang; Feng Lan; Chunjiang He; Nicholas M Mordwinkin; Katrin F Chua; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Stem cell therapy: an exercise in patience and prudence.

Authors:  Huan-Ting Lin; Makoto Otsu; Hiromitsu Nakauchi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Aging and reprogramming: a two-way street.

Authors:  Salah Mahmoudi; Anne Brunet
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 8.382

4.  Cardiac Stem Cell Hybrids Enhance Myocardial Repair.

Authors:  Pearl Quijada; Hazel T Salunga; Nirmala Hariharan; Jonathan D Cubillo; Farid G El-Sayed; Maryam Moshref; Kristin M Bala; Jacqueline M Emathinger; Andrea De La Torre; Lucia Ormachea; Roberto Alvarez; Natalie A Gude; Mark A Sussman
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Cell fusion enhances mesendodermal differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Jie Qin; Stephanie Sontag; Qiong Lin; Saskia Mitzka; Isabelle Leisten; Rebekka K Schneider; Xiaoying Wang; Anna Jauch; Michael Peitz; Oliver Brüstle; Wolfgang Wagner; Robert Chunhua Zhao; Martin Zenke
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.272

6.  DNA synthesis is required for reprogramming mediated by stem cell fusion.

Authors:  Tomomi Tsubouchi; Jorge Soza-Ried; Karen Brown; Francesco M Piccolo; Irene Cantone; David Landeira; Hakan Bagci; Helfrid Hochegger; Matthias Merkenschlager; Amanda G Fisher
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Epigenetic factors influencing resistance to nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Vincent Pasque; Jerome Jullien; Kei Miyamoto; Richard P Halley-Stott; J B Gurdon
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Implications of Cellular Aging in Cardiac Reprogramming.

Authors:  Fabiana Passaro; Gianluca Testa
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-04-27

Review 9.  LncRNAs regulating stemness in aging.

Authors:  António Sousa-Franco; Kenny Rebelo; Simão Teixeira da Rocha; Bruno Bernardes de Jesus
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 9.304

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.