Literature DB >> 21726233

Environment-dependent intralocus sexual conflict in a dioecious plant.

Lynda F Delph1, Jonathan Andicoechea, Janet C Steven, Christopher R Herlihy, Samuel V Scarpino, Daniela L Bell.   

Abstract

Intralocus sexual conflict is a form of conflict that does not involve direct interactions between males and females. It arises when selection on a shared trait with a common genetic basis differs between the sexes. Environmental factors, such as resource availability, may influence the expression and evolutionary outcome of such conflict. We quantified the genetic variance-covariance matrix, G, for both sexes of Silene latifolia for floral and leaf traits, as well as the between-sex matrix, B. We also quantified selection on the sexes via survival for 2 yr in four natural populations that varied in water availability. Environment-dependent intralocus sexual conflict exists for specific leaf area, a trait that is genetically correlated between the sexes. Males experienced significant negative selection, but only in populations with relatively limited water availability. Females experienced weakly positive or significant stabilizing selection on the same trait. Specific leaf area is genetically correlated with flower size and number, which are sexually dimorphic in this species. The extent of intralocus sexual conflict varied with the environment. Resolution of such conflict is likely to be confounded, given that specific leaf area is highly genetically integrated with other traits that are also divergent between the sexes.
© 2011 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2011 New Phytologist Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21726233     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03811.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  18 in total

1.  Sexual antagonism drives the displacement of polymorphism across gene regulatory cascades.

Authors:  Mark S Hill; Max Reuter; Alexander J Stewart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Climatic factors and species range position predict sexually antagonistic selection across taxa.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Debora Goedert; Aaron M Reedy; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Sexually antagonistic selection promotes genetic divergence between males and females in an ant.

Authors:  Pierre-André Eyer; Alexander J Blumenfeld; Edward L Vargo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Are plant and animal sex chromosomes really all that different?

Authors:  Judith E Mank
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Antagonistic versus nonantagonistic models of balancing selection: characterizing the relative timescales and hitchhiking effects of partial selective sweeps.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Field estimates of parentage reveal sexually antagonistic selection on body size in a population of Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Mary C Duryea; Patrick Bergeron; Zachary Clare-Salzler; Ryan Calsbeek
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Do metrics of sexual selection conform to Bateman's principles in a wind-pollinated plant?

Authors:  Jeanne Tonnabel; Patrice David; John R Pannell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Rapid evolution of the intersexual genetic correlation for fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julie M Collet; Sara Fuentes; Jack Hesketh; Mark S Hill; Paolo Innocenti; Edward H Morrow; Kevin Fowler; Max Reuter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.