Literature DB >> 21725408

"It's a small price to pay for life": faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening for colorectal cancer, perceived barriers and facilitators.

Anthony I Reeder1.   

Abstract

AIM: To clarify perceptions influencing FOBT screening participation among the NZ European target population.
METHOD: Participants (30 female, 20 male; 50-71 years) recruited through urban (Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch) GP surgeries for in-depth, face-to-face interviews (digitally recorded and professionally transcribed verbatim). A pragmatic approach focused on aggregating transcript content.
RESULTS: Participants believed early CRC lacked distinguishing signs and symptoms, but was treatable and suitable for screening, although slow development may undermine any sense of urgency. FOBT inaccuracies caused concern, particularly false negatives, but ongoing testing could reduce anxiety. Specimen collection was awkward, challenged social norms and individual squeamishness, but provided peace of mind, was painless, simple and private without high cost technological or professional involvement. Lacking preventive attitudes and experience of health responsibilities and screening, men were less likely to participate than women. CRC lacked public profile, highlighting government responsibility, before programme implementation, to resource high-profile education, largely through TV. General practitioner support and promotion was seen as critical. Inadequate health system capacity and resourcing was problematic.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite challenging barriers, participants identified opportunities to increase FOBT screening participation, especially promotion to raise CRC profile, overcome perceived normative barriers and build self-efficacy. Adequate resourcing is essential to support appropriate promotion and timely programme delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21725408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  5 in total

1.  The impact of supplementary narrative-based information on colorectal cancer screening beliefs and intention.

Authors:  Lesley M McGregor; Christian von Wagner; Gemma Vart; Wing Chee Yuen; Rosalind Raine; Jane Wardle; Kathryn A Robb
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Reasons for non-participation in the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Declan T Bradley; Charlene Treanor; Colin McMullan; Tracy Owen; Adele Graham; Diane Anderson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  What Do Men Want from a Health Screening Mobile App? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Chin Hai Teo; Chirk Jenn Ng; Alan White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Persuasion, Adaptation, and Double Identity: Qualitative Study on the Psychological Impact of a Screen-Detected Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Lesley M McGregor; Sara Tookey; Rosalind Raine; Christian von Wagner; Georgia Black
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Factors influencing young men's decision to undergo health screening in Malaysia: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Chin Hai Teo; Chirk Jenn Ng; Alan White
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.