Literature DB >> 21722980

Quality assurance for prospective EORTC radiation oncology trials: the challenges of advanced technology in a multicenter international setting.

Damien C Weber1, Philip M P Poortmans, Coen W Hurkmans, Edwin Aird, Akos Gulyban, Alysa Fairchild.   

Abstract

The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) is a pan-European structure charged with improving cancer treatment through the testing of new therapeutic strategies in phases I-III clinical studies. Properly conducted trials in radiation oncology are required to demonstrate superiority of a new treatment over the current standard. The Radiation Oncology Group (ROG) has initiated a complex quality assurance (QA) program to ensure safe and effective treatment delivery. Most modern trials are multicenter and multidisciplinary, further increasing the importance of early, strict and consistent QA in radiotherapy (RT). QART measures confirm whether a site possesses minimum staff and equipment for participation. Dummy runs, reviews of patient treatment plans and complex dosimetry checks verify the ability of an institution to comply with the protocol. Data required for evaluation are increasingly exchanged digitally, allowing detailed plan reconstruction, evaluation of target volume delineation and recalculation of dose-volume parameters for comparison against predefined standards. The five tiers of QA implemented in EORTC trials are reviewed, along with past, current and future QART initiatives. As substantial human and financial resources are increasingly invested in QART, the importance of cost-benefit analysis of QA and its impact on clinical outcome cannot be overstated.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21722980     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  24 in total

1.  Development of a software for quantitative evaluation radiotherapy target and organ-at-risk segmentation comparison.

Authors:  Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Musaddiq Awan; Steven Bedrick; Coen R N Rasch; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Quality assurance in head and neck surgery: special considerations to catch up.

Authors:  Guy Andry; Marc Hamoir; C René Leemans
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Radiotherapy protocol deviations and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis of cooperative group clinical trials.

Authors:  Nitin Ohri; Xinglei Shen; Adam P Dicker; Laura A Doyle; Amy S Harrison; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Prospective review of radiotherapy trials through implementation of standardized multicentre workflow and IT infrastructure.

Authors:  Sarah Gwynne; Gareth Jones; Rhydian Maggs; David Eaton; Elizabeth Miles; John Staffurth; Lisette Nixon; Ruby Ray; Geraint Lewis; Tom Crosby; Emiliano Spezi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Radiation therapy quality assurance in clinical trials--Global Harmonisation Group.

Authors:  Christos Melidis; Walter R Bosch; Joanna Izewska; Elena Fidarova; Eduardo Zubizarreta; Satoshi Ishikura; David Followill; James Galvin; Ying Xiao; Martin A Ebert; Tomas Kron; Catharine H Clark; Elizabeth A Miles; Edwin G A Aird; Damien C Weber; Kenneth Ulin; Dirk Verellen; Coen W Hurkmans
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Radiotherapy dosimetry audit: three decades of improving standards and accuracy in UK clinical practice and trials.

Authors:  Catharine H Clark; Edwin G A Aird; Steve Bolton; Elizabeth A Miles; Andrew Nisbet; Julia A D Snaith; Russell A S Thomas; Karen Venables; David I Thwaites
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  An overview of the medical-physics-related verification system for radiotherapy multicenter clinical trials by the Medical Physics Working Group in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group-Radiation Therapy Study Group.

Authors:  Teiji Nishio; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Satoshi Kito; Toshiyuki Minemura; Shuichi Ozawa; Yu Kumazaki; Masayori Ishikawa; Naoki Tohyama; Masahiko Kurooka; Takeo Nakashima; Hidetoshi Shimizu; Ryusuke Suzuki; Satoshi Ishikura; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Benefits of a clinical data warehouse with data mining tools to collect data for a radiotherapy trial.

Authors:  Erik Roelofs; Lucas Persoon; Sebastiaan Nijsten; Wolfgang Wiessler; André Dekker; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Radiotherapy quality assurance for the RTOG 0834/EORTC 26053-22054/NCIC CTG CEC.1/CATNON intergroup trial "concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy in newly diagnosed non-1p/19q deleted anaplastic glioma": Individual case review analysis.

Authors:  André N Abrunhosa-Branquinho; Raquel Bar-Deroma; Sandra Collette; Enrico Clementel; Yan Liu; Coen W Hurkmans; Loïc Feuvret; Karen Van Beek; Martin van den Bent; Brigitta G Baumert; Damien C Weber
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  International data-sharing for radiotherapy research: an open-source based infrastructure for multicentric clinical data mining.

Authors:  Erik Roelofs; André Dekker; Vincenzo Valentini; Philippe Lambin; Elisa Meldolesi; Ruud G P M van Stiphout
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 6.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.