Literature DB >> 21721969

Psychometric characteristics of process evaluation measures for a rural school-based childhood obesity prevention study: Louisiana Health.

Robert L Newton1, Jessica L Thomson, Kristi K Rau, Shelly A Ragusa, Alicia D Sample, Nakisha N Singleton, Stephen D Anton, Larry S Webber, Donald A Williamson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the implementation of intervention components of the Louisiana Health study, which was a multicomponent childhood obesity prevention program conducted in rural schools.
DESIGN: Content analysis.
SETTING: Process evaluation assessed implementation in classrooms, gym classes, and cafeterias.
SUBJECTS: Classroom teachers (n  =  232), physical education teachers (n  =  53), food service managers (n  =  33), and trained observers (n  =  9). MEASURES: Five process evaluation measures were created: Physical Education Questionnaire (PEQ), Intervention Questionnaire (IQ), Food Service Manager Questionnaire (FSMQ), Classroom Observation (CO), and School Nutrition Environment Observation (SNEO). ANALYSIS: Interrater reliability and internal consistency were assessed on all measures. Analysis of variance and χ(2) were used to compare differences across study groups on questionnaires and observations.
RESULTS: The PEQ and one subscale from the FSMQ were eliminated because their reliability coefficients fell below acceptable standards. The subscale internal consistencies for the IQ, FSMQ, CO, and SNEO (all Cronbach α > .60) were acceptable.
CONCLUSIONS: After the initial 4 months of intervention, there was evidence that the Louisiana Health intervention was being implemented as it was designed. In summary, four process evaluation measures were found to be sufficiently reliable and valid for assessing the delivery of various aspects of a school-based obesity prevention program. These process measures could be modified to evaluate the delivery of other similar school-based interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21721969      PMCID: PMC3132146          DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.090914-ARB-297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  8 in total

Review 1.  Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide.

Authors:  Ruth P Saunders; Martin H Evans; Praphul Joshi
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2005-04

Review 2.  School-based interventions for childhood and adolescent obesity.

Authors:  M Sharma
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.213

3.  Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.

Authors:  Kilem Li Gwet
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Design of process evaluation within the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH).

Authors:  S A McGraw; E J Stone; S K Osganian; J P Elder; C L Perry; C C Johnson; G S Parcel; L S Webber; R V Luepker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1994

Review 5.  Obesity prevention programs for children and youth: why are their results so modest?

Authors:  Helen Thomas
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2006-11-10

Review 6.  School-based obesity prevention programs: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kropski; Paul H Keckley; Gordon L Jensen
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Louisiana (LA) Health: design and methods for a childhood obesity prevention program in rural schools.

Authors:  Donald A Williamson; Catherine M Champagne; David Harsha; Hongmei Han; Corby K Martin; Robert Newton; Tiffany M Stewart; Donna H Ryan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Internal consistency reliability is a poor predictor of responsiveness.

Authors:  Milo A Puhan; Dianne Bryant; Gordon H Guyatt; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 3.186

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Interventions for preventing obesity in children.

Authors:  Tamara Brown; Theresa Hm Moore; Lee Hooper; Yang Gao; Amir Zayegh; Sharea Ijaz; Martha Elwenspoek; Sophie C Foxen; Lucia Magee; Claire O'Malley; Elizabeth Waters; Carolyn D Summerbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-23

Review 2.  A systematic review of existing observational tools to measure the food and physical activity environment in schools.

Authors:  Hannah G Lane; Hannah G Calvert; Rachel Deitch; Ryan Harris; Oyinlola T Babatunde; Lindsey Turner; Erin R Hager; Stephanie Jilcott Pitts
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 4.931

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.